[OpenStack Foundation] OpenStack Mission & Goals

michael hempel otaku at gface.com
Thu Jan 5 00:29:42 UTC 2012


 From the last mail-cycle my impression was that it wasn't even clear as 
who could join and on what premises.
Didn't monitor the webpages though...

On 01/05/2012 01:25 AM, Rick Clark wrote:
> I think some community pressure is in order.  After the initial PR bump
> of the announcement, perhaps the pressure is a bit low.  I really hope
> that this is more than a PR.
>
> I have been surprised how many people think a foundation already exists.
>
> Perhaps we can make some suggestions.
>
> I suggest that as of the next election cycle, all of the PPB is elected,
> including the Chair.
>
>
>
> On 01/04/2012 06:19 PM, Cole Crawford wrote:
>    
>> Hey Jan!
>>
>> Hope that's not the case.  That would be a sad day for Openstack!!
>>
>> From: Jan Drake<jan_drake at hotmail.com<mailto:jan_drake at hotmail.com>>
>> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:18:04 -0800
>> To:<sandy.walsh at rackspace.com<mailto:sandy.walsh at rackspace.com>>
>> Cc:<foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>>,<openstack at lists.launchpad.net<mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net>>
>> Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] OpenStack Mission&  Goals
>>
>>
>>
>> So, no messages since October.  Rumor has it the effort is dead or indefinitely delayed... what's the deal?
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>      
>>> From: jan_drake at hotmail.com<mailto:jan_drake at hotmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:18:46 -0700
>>> To: sandy.walsh at RACKSPACE.COM<mailto:sandy.walsh at RACKSPACE.COM>
>>> CC: foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] OpenStack Mission&  Goals
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Sandy Walsh<sandy.walsh at RACKSPACE.COM<mailto:sandy.walsh at RACKSPACE.COM>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> How can you decide if you want to join a foundation if you don't know what it stands for?
>>>>
>>>> -S
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----
>>>> I think a discussion about what OpenStack is and isn't should
>>>> definitely be had before the Foundation is set up. Otherwise, I
>>>> imagine people will view the Foundation as being some sort of Wild
>>>> West land grab, where companies are trying to shape what OpenStack is
>>>> by fiat or by trying to buy control.
>>>>
>>>> Just a thought,
>>>> -jay
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Foundation mailing list
>>>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org>
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>>>> This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Foundation mailing list
>>>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org>
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Foundation mailing list
>>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org>  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foundation mailing list
>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>>      
>
>    
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>    




More information about the Foundation mailing list