Open Stack

Oops, my bad :-/

I went to some of those talks but didn't fully realize that they were part
of a unified track.

Anyway, I think maybe Tristan's point is to have a similar format to the
developer sessions but instead with a focus on operations/deployment.

This is going to be tough though.  Vendors are naturally much more
interested in the operations/deployment side for obvious reasons and that
sets up more challenges for managing the meetings effectively and openly.

Anyway, I think it's a good idea (if I understood Tristan correctly).

-Adam

--
Kili.io - OpenStack for Africa: kili.io
Musings: twitter.com/varud <https://twitter.com/varud>
About Adam: www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:

> On 2013-12-15 08:09:57 -0800 (-0800), John Dickinson wrote:
> [...]
> > It's got to be balanced so it doesn't turn into a vendor honeypot
> [...]
>
> FWIW, over the past couple summits I've been most scrutinizing of
> any talks which look like they have some chance of being warped into
> a vendor-specific sales pitch, and choose open forum/panel formats
> and presentations from deployers before all else. Put in abstracts
> for these sorts of sessions and I can pretty well guarantee, at
> least for any track I chair, that they'll be selected.
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20131215/691e8006/attachment.html>