Open Stack

On 10/31/2012 03:36 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 06:21 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>> Having 600+ alligned votes from a single company entirely violates
>> the 'Do what is best for the project',
>
> Why do you say that? Are the people elected not the best possible
> people? Have they failed (or why do you think they will fail)
> representing the interests of Individual Members? Do you believe that
> some of them will vote for the company before they vote for the project
> and not do what's best for OpenStack? 


yes, I've seen it too many times before.

In my view, contribution is your ticket to be able to vote &
contribution is your ticket to be able to nominate someone.

Carl.