[OpenStack Foundation] [all] IRC Channel Renames

Kendall Nelson kennelson11 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 27 23:33:19 UTC 2021


That's the plan :)

-Kendall (diablo_rojo)

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:39 PM Kanevsky, Arkady <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
wrote:

> Dell Customer Communication - Confidential
>
> Kendall,
>
> As I suggested, lets redirect old openstack channels to corresponding
> openinfra ones.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Arkady
>
>
>
> *From:* Kendall Nelson <kennelson11 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2021 2:45 PM
> *To:* Wes Wilson
> *Cc:* Amy Marrich; Jeremy Stanley; foundation at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [all] IRC Channel Renames
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Hello Everyone!
>
>
>
> Quick update: It sounds like we have managed to negotiate control of the
> #openinfra group on freenode and can begin the migration! (Correct me
> if I'm wrong, fungi :) ).
>
>
>
> So! This is the plan:
>
>
> - #openstack-ptg  -> #openinfra-ptg
>
> - #openstack-forum -> #openinfra-forum
>
> - #openstack-diversity -> #openinfra-diversity
>
> - #openstack-board -> #openinfra-board (this one has already begun)
>
> - #openstack-foundation -> #openinfra
>
> - #openinfra-summit -> #openinfra-summit
>
>
>
> If there are any others you have seen that could also require updating,
> please let us know! I will be coordinating with fungi to do the migrations
> this week and will work on updating any documentation after the migrations
> take place.
>
>
>
> -Kendall (diablo_rojo)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:21 AM Wes Wilson <wes at openstack.org> wrote:
>
> One logistical item to point out. We have been advised to minimize our use
> of “OIF” to reduce confusion with another organization that has a trademark
> on “OIF”. While we won’t be able to prevent everyone from using the acronym
> to reference the foundation, much like OSF was used, we have been advised
> to not use it in “attention getting” places.
>
>
>
> We have started to replace the acronym with “OpenInfra Foundation” and
> “OpenInfra” depending on the use case. Another option to consider that
> we’re using for twitter handle, url, and similar spots is “OpenInfraDev”.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wes
>
>
>
> On Dec 15, 2020, at 10:50 AM, Amy Marrich <amy at demarco.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Kendall and Jeremy,
>
>
>
> I'm good with the suggested name changes especially with that added
> information the openinfra isn't available. We should definitely keep it
> short so don't feel going to openinfratructure is a good alternative even
> if it is more obvious. I do think the more we use OIF vs OSF it'll be more
> natural for people to look for it.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Amy (spotz)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:34 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-15 12:20:58 -0600 (-0600), Ryan Beisner wrote:
> > My $0.02 over lunch:  I think #openinfra-* would be a fitting move
> > with the same number of digits and a recognizable moniker.
> [...]
>
> The blocker there is that we can't control the #openinfra-*
> namespace on Freenode because the #openinfra channel is already
> taken by the separate https://opensourceinfra.org/ community.
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20210127/530b2bc4/attachment.html>


More information about the Foundation mailing list