Ohh what about opninfra?:) On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:46 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2020-12-15 11:21:55 -0800 (-0800), Wes Wilson wrote: > > One logistical item to point out. We have been advised to minimize > > our use of “OIF” to reduce confusion with another organization > > that has a trademark on “OIF”. > > Presumably that's this organization: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_Internetworking_Forum > > > While we won’t be able to prevent everyone from using the acronym > > to reference the foundation, much like OSF was used, we have been > > advised to not use it in “attention getting” places. > [...] > > Right, so #oif and #oif-* channels seem to be out of the question. > I'm temporarily squatting #infra if folks think that could make a > good (short, not trademarkable) namespace for the foundation > channels. > -- > Jeremy Stanley > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20201215/b025b3f0/attachment.html>