From amy at demarco.com Wed May 1 23:18:40 2019 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 17:18:40 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] Cancelled - Next Diversity and Inclusion WG meeting Message-ID: Due to Summit and PTG we will be cancelling the next D&I WG meeting which would have been next week. I do want to thank everyone who attended Speed Mentoring, the Diversity Networking Lunch and all the Wednesday sessions. Thanks, Amy (spotz) From ashlee at openstack.org Mon May 6 18:20:00 2019 From: ashlee at openstack.org (Ashlee Ferguson) Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 13:20:00 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Shanghai Summit Programming Committee Nominations Open Message-ID: <2631F356-5352-41BF-AD86-DF2AB17F349C@openstack.org> Thank you to everyone who attended the Open Infrastructure Summit in Denver. The event was a huge success! If you weren’t able to make it, check out the videos page [1]. Keynotes are up now, and the rest of the sessions will be uploaded in the next week. We’ll also be sharing a Summit recap in the Open Infrastructure Community Newsletter, which you can subscribe to here [2]. The next Summit + PTG will be in Shanghai, November 4 - 6, and the PTG will be November 6 - 8, 2019. Registration and Programming Committee nominations for the Shanghai Open Infrastructure Summit + PTG [3] are open! The Programming Committee helps select the content from the Call for Presentations (CFP) for the Summit schedule. Sessions will be presented in both English and Mandarin, so we will be accepting CFP submissions in both languages. The CFP will open early next week. • Nominate yourself or someone else for the Programming Committee [4] before May 20, 2019 • Shanghai Summit + PTG registration is available in the following currencies: • Register in USD [5] • Register in RMB (includes fapiao) [6] Thanks, Ashlee [1] https://www.openstack.org/videos [2] https://www.openstack.org/community/email-signup [3] https://www.openstack.org/summit/shanghai-2019 [4] http://bit.ly/ShanghaiProgrammingCommittee [5] https://app.eventxtra.link/registrations/6640a923-98d7-44c7-a623-1e2c9132b402?locale=en [6] https://app.eventxtra.link/registrations/f564960c-74f6-452d-b0b2-484386d33eb6?locale=en From ashlee at openstack.org Wed May 15 01:03:17 2019 From: ashlee at openstack.org (Ashlee Ferguson) Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 20:03:17 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Open Infrastructure Summit CFP Open - Deadline: July 2 Message-ID: <1ED31B50-AE18-40D3-BB17-3D3E9FC5BD93@openstack.org> Hi everyone, The Call for Presentations (CFP) [1] for the Open Infrastructure Summit in Shanghai (November 4 - 6, 2019) [2] is open! Review the list of Tracks [3], and submit your presentations, panels, and workshops before July 2, 2019. Sessions will be presented in both Mandarin and English, so you may submit your presentation in either language. The content submission process for the Forum and Project Teams Gathering will be managed separately in the upcoming months. SUBMIT YOUR PRESENTATION [1] - Deadline July 2, 2019 at 11:59pm PT (July 3 at 6:59 UTC) Want to help shape the content for the Summit? The Programming Committee helps select sessions from the CFP for the Summit schedule. Nominate yourself or someone else for the Programming Committee [4] before May 20, 2019. Registration and Sponsorship • Shanghai Summit + PTG registration is available in the following currencies: • Register in USD [5] • Register in RMB (includes fapiao) [6] • Sponsorship opportunities [7] Please email speakersupport at openstack.org with any questions or feedback. Thanks, Ashlee [1] https://cfp.openstack.org/ [2] https://www.openstack.org/summit/shanghai-2019 [3] https://www.openstack.org/summit/shanghai-2019/summit-categories [4] http://bit.ly/ShanghaiProgrammingCommittee [5] https://app.eventxtra.link/registrations/6640a923-98d7-44c7-a623-1e2c9132b402?locale=en [6] https://app.eventxtra.link/registrations/f564960c-74f6-452d-b0b2-484386d33eb6?locale=en [7] https://www.openstack.org/summit/shanghai-2019/sponsors/ Ashlee Ferguson OpenStack Foundation ashlee at openstack.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amy at demarco.com Fri May 17 15:55:57 2019 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 10:55:57 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] Diversity and Inclusion meeting cancelled Message-ID: We will be cancelling Mondays meeting and will resume meeting on Monday, June 3rd. Upcoming topics of discussion will be Summit, CoC review, and the future of the Women of OpenStack mailing list and linked in group. Thanks, Amy (spotz) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alanclark at openstack.org Mon May 20 17:39:39 2019 From: alanclark at openstack.org (Alan Clark) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 11:39:39 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019 Message-ID: <005701d50f33$02661190$073234b0$@openstack.org> Directors, On the calendar we have a board meeting listed for 4 June 2019. I would like to propose that we cancel this meeting. With the Face to Face board meeting in Denver and the added board meeting we added just prior to Denver I feel you've probably had your fill of board meetings for the moment plus I believe that we've covered the needed topics at this point in time. At least those that can't be handled via email. So unless anyone objects I will pull the meeting from the calendar. Thanks, AlanClark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sean.mcginnis at gmail.com Mon May 20 17:58:40 2019 From: sean.mcginnis at gmail.com (Sean McGinnis) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 12:58:40 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019 In-Reply-To: <005701d50f33$02661190$073234b0$@openstack.org> References: <005701d50f33$02661190$073234b0$@openstack.org> Message-ID: This seems reasonable to me Alan. The only outstanding bit of business left over from Denver that I remember is the vote on whether to add the language for allowing closed meetings to discuss new pilot projects. I don't believe that is anything time critical at this point, so I think we can let folks stew on that a little longer until the next meeting. Sean On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:47 PM Alan Clark wrote: > Directors, > > On the calendar we have a board meeting listed for 4 June 2019. I would > like to propose that we cancel this meeting. > > > > With the Face to Face board meeting in Denver and the added board meeting > we added just prior to Denver I feel you’ve probably had your fill of board > meetings for the moment plus I believe that we’ve covered the needed topics > at this point in time. At least those that can’t be handled via email. > > > > So unless anyone objects I will pull the meeting from the calendar. > > > > Thanks, > > AlanClark > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Mon May 20 18:13:30 2019 From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 18:13:30 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019 In-Reply-To: References: <005701d50f33$02661190$073234b0$@openstack.org> Message-ID: Sounds good to me. From: Sean McGinnis Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 12:59 PM To: AlanClark at openstack.org Cc: foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019 [EXTERNAL EMAIL] This seems reasonable to me Alan. The only outstanding bit of business left over from Denver that I remember is the vote on whether to add the language for allowing closed meetings to discuss new pilot projects. I don't believe that is anything time critical at this point, so I think we can let folks stew on that a little longer until the next meeting. Sean On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:47 PM Alan Clark > wrote: Directors, On the calendar we have a board meeting listed for 4 June 2019. I would like to propose that we cancel this meeting. With the Face to Face board meeting in Denver and the added board meeting we added just prior to Denver I feel you’ve probably had your fill of board meetings for the moment plus I believe that we’ve covered the needed topics at this point in time. At least those that can’t be handled via email. So unless anyone objects I will pull the meeting from the calendar. Thanks, AlanClark _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rv6848 at att.com Mon May 20 18:15:48 2019 From: rv6848 at att.com (VAN WYK, RYAN L) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 18:15:48 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019 In-Reply-To: References: <005701d50f33$02661190$073234b0$@openstack.org> Message-ID: <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA556F98ED@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com> Agree. Ryan van Wyk Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Member of Technical Staff Network Cloud & Infrastructure, Network Cloud Software Engineering From: Sean McGinnis Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 12:59 PM To: AlanClark at openstack.org Cc: foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019 This seems reasonable to me Alan. The only outstanding bit of business left over from Denver that I remember is the vote on whether to add the language for allowing closed meetings to discuss new pilot projects. I don't believe that is anything time critical at this point, so I think we can let folks stew on that a little longer until the next meeting. Sean On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:47 PM Alan Clark > wrote: Directors, On the calendar we have a board meeting listed for 4 June 2019. I would like to propose that we cancel this meeting. With the Face to Face board meeting in Denver and the added board meeting we added just prior to Denver I feel you’ve probably had your fill of board meetings for the moment plus I believe that we’ve covered the needed topics at this point in time. At least those that can’t be handled via email. So unless anyone objects I will pull the meeting from the calendar. Thanks, AlanClark _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From clemens.hardewig at crandale.de Mon May 20 20:26:39 2019 From: clemens.hardewig at crandale.de (=?utf-8?Q?Clemens_Hardewig?=) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 20:26:39 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019 In-Reply-To: References: <005701d50f33$02661190$073234b0$@openstack.org> Message-ID: Fine for me too Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 20.05.2019 um 20:15 schrieb "Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com " >: Sounds good to me.   From: Sean McGinnis > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 12:59 PM To: AlanClark at openstack.org Cc: foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019   [EXTERNAL EMAIL] This seems reasonable to me Alan. The only outstanding bit of business left over from Denver that I remember is the vote on whether to add the language for allowing closed meetings to discuss new pilot projects. I don't believe that is anything time critical at this point, so I think we can let folks stew on that a little longer until the next meeting.   Sean   On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:47 PM Alan Clark > wrote: Directors, On the calendar we have a board meeting listed for 4 June 2019.  I would like to propose that we cancel this meeting.   With the Face to Face board meeting in Denver and the added board meeting we added just prior to Denver I feel you’ve probably had your fill of board meetings for the moment plus I believe that we’ve covered the needed topics at this point in time. At least those that can’t be handled via email.   So unless anyone objects I will pull the meeting from the calendar.   Thanks, AlanClark   _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From allison at lohutok.net Mon May 20 20:57:59 2019 From: allison at lohutok.net (Allison Randal) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 13:57:59 -0700 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack board meeting on June 4, 2019 In-Reply-To: <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA556F98ED@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com> References: <005701d50f33$02661190$073234b0$@openstack.org> <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA556F98ED@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com> Message-ID: <8ea782a4-2428-1488-6ee9-5dea2cf2c470@lohutok.net> Nod, makes sense. On 5/20/19 7:15 PM, VAN WYK, RYAN L wrote: > Agree. > >   > > *Ryan van Wyk* > > Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Member of Technical Staff > > Network Cloud & Infrastructure, Network Cloud Software Engineering > >   > >   > > *From:* Sean McGinnis > *Sent:* Monday, May 20, 2019 12:59 PM > *To:* AlanClark at openstack.org > *Cc:* foundation at lists.openstack.org > *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Propose to not hold an OpenStack > board meeting on June 4, 2019 > >   > > This seems reasonable to me Alan. The only outstanding bit of business > left over from Denver that I remember is the vote on whether to add the > language for allowing closed meetings to discuss new pilot projects. I > don't believe that is anything time critical at this point, so I think > we can let folks stew on that a little longer until the next meeting. > >   > > Sean > >   > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:47 PM Alan Clark > wrote: > > Directors, > > On the calendar we have a board meeting listed for 4 June 2019.  I > would like to propose that we cancel this meeting. > >   > > With the Face to Face board meeting in Denver and the added board > meeting we added just prior to Denver I feel you’ve probably had > your fill of board meetings for the moment plus I believe that we’ve > covered the needed topics at this point in time. At least those that > can’t be handled via email. > >   > > So unless anyone objects I will pull the meeting from the calendar. > >   > > Thanks, > > AlanClark > >   > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > From yongle.li at gmail.com Tue May 21 11:15:38 2019 From: yongle.li at gmail.com (Fred Li) Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 19:15:38 +0800 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] OSF Product Classification Matrix Message-ID: I am wondering whether projects under OpenStack Foundation follows US Export Regulations[1] or not. I tried check OpenStack legal documents[2], but didn't find anything about this topic. As an example, ASF listed the ECCN (Export Control Classification Number) for its software [3]. I don't know where I can find OpenStack projects' ECCN. Hope you can help to point the information. [1] http://www.bis.doc.gov/ [2] https://www.openstack.org/legal/ [3] https://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ -- Regards Fred Li (李永乐) From mnaser at vexxhost.com Tue May 21 11:30:02 2019 From: mnaser at vexxhost.com (Mohammed Naser) Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 19:30:02 +0800 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] OSF Product Classification Matrix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, May 21, 2019, 7:20 PM Fred Li wrote: > I am wondering whether projects under OpenStack Foundation follows US > Export Regulations[1] or not. I tried check OpenStack legal > documents[2], but didn't find anything about this topic. > As an example, ASF listed the ECCN (Export Control Classification > Number) for its software [3]. I don't know where I can find OpenStack > projects' ECCN. > First off -- I'm sorry that this is even something you have to deal with right now. We should focus on ensuring that we maintain our four opens. http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss I suggest perhaps forwarding your email to the mailing list above. Hope you can help to point the information. > > [1] http://www.bis.doc.gov/ > [2] https://www.openstack.org/legal/ > [3] https://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ > > -- > Regards > Fred Li (李永乐) > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From yongle.li at gmail.com Tue May 21 12:43:09 2019 From: yongle.li at gmail.com (Fred Li) Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 20:43:09 +0800 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] OSF Product Classification Matrix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I added another example from Linux Foundation [4]. Hope such examples can help explaining my question better. [4] https://www.linuxfoundation.org/export/ On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 7:33 PM Fred Li wrote: > > Hope legal discussion team can help on this topic. Thanks > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Mohammed Naser > Date: Tue, May 21, 2019 at 7:30 PM > Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] OSF Product Classification Matrix > To: Fred Li > Cc: , > > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2019, 7:20 PM Fred Li wrote: > > > > I am wondering whether projects under OpenStack Foundation follows US > > Export Regulations[1] or not. I tried check OpenStack legal > > documents[2], but didn't find anything about this topic. > > As an example, ASF listed the ECCN (Export Control Classification > > Number) for its software [3]. I don't know where I can find OpenStack > > projects' ECCN. > > > First off -- I'm sorry that this is even something you have to deal > with right now. We should focus on ensuring that we maintain our four > opens. > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss > > I suggest perhaps forwarding your email to the mailing list above. > > > Hope you can help to point the information. > > > > [1] http://www.bis.doc.gov/ > > [2] https://www.openstack.org/legal/ > > [3] https://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ > > > > -- > > Regards > > Fred Li (李永乐) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Foundation mailing list > > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > > > > -- > Regards > Fred Li (李永乐) -- Regards Fred Li (李永乐) From mark at openstack.org Tue May 21 18:38:39 2019 From: mark at openstack.org (Mark Collier) Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 13:38:39 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] OSF Product Classification Matrix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1558463919.05521695@emailsrvr.com> Thanks for raising this issue. We have previously registered OpenStack software as publicly available software in this manner, and we will publish a similar webpage on the OSF website for reference in the next few days so that the information is readily accessible. Feel free to direct any questions to myself (mark at openstack.org) or Jonathan Bryce (jonathan at openstack.org) Thanks, Mark On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 7:43am, "Fred Li" said: > I added another example from Linux Foundation [4]. Hope such examples > can help explaining my question better. > > [4] https://www.linuxfoundation.org/export/ > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 7:33 PM Fred Li wrote: >> >> Hope legal discussion team can help on this topic. Thanks >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Mohammed Naser >> Date: Tue, May 21, 2019 at 7:30 PM >> Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] OSF Product Classification Matrix >> To: Fred Li >> Cc: , >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2019, 7:20 PM Fred Li wrote: >> > >> > I am wondering whether projects under OpenStack Foundation follows US >> > Export Regulations[1] or not. I tried check OpenStack legal >> > documents[2], but didn't find anything about this topic. >> > As an example, ASF listed the ECCN (Export Control Classification >> > Number) for its software [3]. I don't know where I can find OpenStack >> > projects' ECCN. >> >> >> First off -- I'm sorry that this is even something you have to deal >> with right now. We should focus on ensuring that we maintain our four >> opens. >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss >> >> I suggest perhaps forwarding your email to the mailing list above. >> >> > Hope you can help to point the information. >> > >> > [1] http://www.bis.doc.gov/ >> > [2] https://www.openstack.org/legal/ >> > [3] https://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ >> > >> > -- >> > Regards >> > Fred Li (李永乐) >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Foundation mailing list >> > Foundation at lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> Fred Li (李永乐) > > > > -- > Regards > Fred Li (李永乐) > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > From mark at openstack.org Wed May 22 17:58:36 2019 From: mark at openstack.org (Mark Collier) Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 12:58:36 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] OpenStack Foundation & Export / EAR Message-ID: <1558547916.628727212@emailsrvr.com> The OpenStack Foundation has received inquiries regarding concerns with a member subject to an Entity List Ruling.[1] While statements in the Executive Order prompting the listing used language granting a broader scope of authority, the Huawei Entity List ruling was specifically scoped to activities and transactions subject to the Export Administration Regulation (EAR). Open source encryption software source code was reclassified by the US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) effective September 20, 2016 as "publicly available" and no longer “subject to the EAR.”[2] Each open source project is still required to send a notice of the URL to BIS and NSA to satisfy the "publicly available" notice requirement in the EAR at 15 CFR § 742.15(b). The OpenStack Foundation (OSF) continues to work with our projects to ensure their notices are up to date and are maintained in the future.[3] Open source software, collaboration on open source code, attending telephonic or in person meetings, participating in training and providing membership or sponsorship funds are all activities which are not subject to the EAR and therefore should have no impact on our communities. If there is a unique situation of concern, we encourage you to reach out directly to mark at openstack.org or jonathan at openstack.org. [1] https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/regulations-docs/2394-huawei-and-affiliates-entity-list-rule/file [2] 81 Fed. Reg. 64656, 64668 (September 20, 2016). See also, https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/policy-guidance/encryption/223-new-encryption [3] https://osf.dev/export P.S. Special thanks to Mark Radcliffe and Thomas deButts from DLA Piper, who've been working with OSF, LF and others to pull the necessary information together for benefit of many open source communities. From amy at demarco.com Thu May 30 19:05:13 2019 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 14:05:13 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] D&I WG Meeting reminder for 6/3 Message-ID: After a bit of a break, the Diversity & Inclusion WG will hold it's next meeting this Monday(6/3) at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-diversity channel. The agenda can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity -wg-agenda. Please feel free to add any other topics you wish to discuss at the meeting. Including the discuss list to invite potential new members! Thanks, Amy (spotz) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: