From amy at demarco.com Tue Mar 5 01:55:51 2019 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:55:51 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] Open Communities Call on Allies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Forwarding for anyone who might be interested. Thanks, Amy (spotz) ---------- Forwarded message --------- Hi Amy I wonder if you would share the link to our D&I in Open Communities Call (this Thur), the topic is 'Every day actions to be a better ally' , and I have heard from a lot of people that a topic on allies is critical, but not 100% how to reach potential allies. Here is the RSVP link . Also FYI I mentioned OpenStack in this article I wrote to accompany the IRL podcast (What if women built the internet ), I hope it represents your work accurately. Thank you! -- Emma Irwin (she/her) Community Development Open Innovation Team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jonathan at openstack.org Tue Mar 5 22:56:47 2019 From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:56:47 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] March 5, 2019 Board Meeting Message-ID: <49AFB0C0-1C5A-4D44-A3B1-4FA993F8C472@openstack.org> Today the OpenStack Foundation Board of Directors held a teleconference meeting. The agenda was posted on the wiki beforehand[1]. The bulk of the meeting was spent discussing the confirmation guidelines[2] for new Open Infrastructure Projects under the Foundation. Allison Randal led the Board through a review of the process by which the guidelines were drafted and their current state. The Board unanimously approved the guidelines. In addition to the guidelines themselves, the Board also discussed some procedural items around meeting and reviewing projects for confirmation. The Board agreed to add an additional meeting prior to the Denver Summit to do an initial review of any projects that may be seeking confirmation. The Board also discussed whether there was a need to include an executive session discussion as part of each project review. There was not a formal vote on the executive session issue, but a straw vote seemed to indicate that most Board members felt that they would not want to schedule an executive session for every project review, but did want to retain the ability for a Board member to request one if needed. The Bylaws of the Foundation[3] do not currently allow for that as a valid reason to have an executive session (section 4.16), so that will require an additional step to update to allow that as an option. Big thanks to Allison Randal for managing the process of creating the guidelines and helping us to pass another milestone as we seek to support more open infrastructure collaboration! Next, Alan presented a report from the Compensation Committee for review and feedback from the full Board. Finally Prakash discussed community building efforts in India and proposed a meeting around the topic during the upcoming Summit in Denver. Thanks, Jonathan 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/5March2019BoardMeeting 2. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/OSFProjectConfirmationGuidelines 3. https://www.openstack.org/legal/bylaws-of-the-openstack-foundation/ From amy at demarco.com Sat Mar 9 00:57:35 2019 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 18:57:35 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] Meeting Reminder for this Monday 3/11 Message-ID: The Diversity & Inclusion WG will hold it's next meeting Monday(3/11) at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-diversity channel. The agenda can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda. Please feel free to add any other topics you wish to discuss at the meeting. Also remember if you changed your clocks for the time change the meeting will be 1 hour later. Thanks, Amy (spotz) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mnaser at vexxhost.com Mon Mar 11 17:08:41 2019 From: mnaser at vexxhost.com (Mohammed Naser) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:08:41 -0400 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects Message-ID: Hi everyone, Jonathan reached out on IRC a few days ago regarding the idea of soliciting optional feedback regarding pilot projects that are up for confirmation. I'd like us to establish some sort of framework around doing this. http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2019-03-05.log.html#t2019-03-05T22:31:17 How can we proceed in the next steps in making this happen? Thanks, Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost ----------------------------------------------------- D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E. mnaser at vexxhost.com W. http://vexxhost.com From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Mon Mar 11 20:17:14 2019 From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:17:14 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Mohammed, Is the goal to have a doc where we collect feedback per pilot project from Board? TC? Community? Should we have a board member as a curator per pilot to help them collect feedback and advice pilot project to prepare for board meeting? Thanks, Arkady -----Original Message----- From: Mohammed Naser Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 12:09 PM To: foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Hi everyone, Jonathan reached out on IRC a few days ago regarding the idea of soliciting optional feedback regarding pilot projects that are up for confirmation. I'd like us to establish some sort of framework around doing this. http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2019-03-05.log.html#t2019-03-05T22:31:17 How can we proceed in the next steps in making this happen? Thanks, Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost ----------------------------------------------------- D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E. mnaser at vexxhost.com W. http://vexxhost.com _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From doug at doughellmann.com Tue Mar 12 12:39:12 2019 From: doug at doughellmann.com (Doug Hellmann) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:39:12 -0400 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: writes: > Mohammed, > Is the goal to have a doc where we collect feedback per pilot project from Board? TC? Community? We were asked specifically about the process the TC preferred for being involved in the evaluation of new OIP applications, in order to handle the step where the leadership groups of other confirmed projects have a chance to provide their input. > Should we have a board member as a curator per pilot to help them > collect feedback and advice pilot project to prepare for board > meeting? That sounds like a good idea, but I think it's a separate question from what Jonathan was looking for input on. Doug > Thanks, > Arkady > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mohammed Naser > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 12:09 PM > To: foundation at lists.openstack.org > Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > Hi everyone, > > Jonathan reached out on IRC a few days ago regarding the idea of soliciting optional feedback regarding pilot projects that are up for confirmation. I'd like us to establish some sort of framework around doing this. > > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2019-03-05.log.html#t2019-03-05T22:31:17 > > How can we proceed in the next steps in making this happen? > > Thanks, > Mohammed > > -- > Mohammed Naser — vexxhost > ----------------------------------------------------- > D. 514-316-8872 > D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 > E. mnaser at vexxhost.com > W. http://vexxhost.com > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -- Doug From doug at doughellmann.com Tue Mar 12 12:40:28 2019 From: doug at doughellmann.com (Doug Hellmann) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:40:28 -0400 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: writes: > Mohammed, > Is the goal to have a doc where we collect feedback per pilot project from Board? TC? Community? We were asked specifically about the process the TC preferred for being involved in the evaluation of new OIP applications, in order to handle the step where the leadership groups of other confirmed projects have a chance to provide their input. > Should we have a board member as a curator per pilot to help them > collect feedback and advice pilot project to prepare for board > meeting? That sounds like a good idea, but I think it's a separate question from what Jonathan was looking for input on. Doug > Thanks, > Arkady > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mohammed Naser > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 12:09 PM > To: foundation at lists.openstack.org > Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > Hi everyone, > > Jonathan reached out on IRC a few days ago regarding the idea of soliciting optional feedback regarding pilot projects that are up for confirmation. I'd like us to establish some sort of framework around doing this. > > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2019-03-05.log.html#t2019-03-05T22:31:17 > > How can we proceed in the next steps in making this happen? > > Thanks, > Mohammed > > -- > Mohammed Naser — vexxhost > ----------------------------------------------------- > D. 514-316-8872 > D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 > E. mnaser at vexxhost.com > W. http://vexxhost.com > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -- Doug From jonathan at openstack.org Tue Mar 12 15:30:39 2019 From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:30:39 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> > On Mar 12, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > writes: > >> Mohammed, >> Is the goal to have a doc where we collect feedback per pilot project from Board? TC? Community? > > We were asked specifically about the process the TC preferred for being > involved in the evaluation of new OIP applications, in order to handle > the step where the leadership groups of other confirmed projects have a > chance to provide their input. Thanks for chiming in here Doug. This specific request is to the TC as the process allows for official input from other confirmed projects’ governance bodies when a new project is being considered for confirmation. This could be anything from a simple email to me and Alan, a formal resolution from the TC, or even a decision to not have an opinion. Since we’re just setting up this process, I was hoping to hear how the TC would like to be involved so we can make that part of the workflow for each of the projects that come up. We will be having the next Board meeting on April 8 (4 weeks from yesterday), where we will do an initial review of pilot projects that wish to apply. At this point, that could include Kata Containers and Zuul, although we are just starting to work with the projects on their portion of the confirmation process. I think if the TC wishes to provide feedback on either of those projects, it would be ideal to have it ahead of the April 8th meeting. Jonathan > Should we have a board member as a curator per pilot to help them >> collect feedback and advice pilot project to prepare for board >> meeting? > > That sounds like a good idea, but I think it's a separate question from > what Jonathan was looking for input on. > > Doug > >> Thanks, >> Arkady >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mohammed Naser >> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 12:09 PM >> To: foundation at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects >> >> >> [EXTERNAL EMAIL] >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Jonathan reached out on IRC a few days ago regarding the idea of soliciting optional feedback regarding pilot projects that are up for confirmation. I'd like us to establish some sort of framework around doing this. >> >> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2019-03-05.log.html#t2019-03-05T22:31:17 >> >> How can we proceed in the next steps in making this happen? >> >> Thanks, >> Mohammed >> >> -- >> Mohammed Naser — vexxhost >> ----------------------------------------------------- >> D. 514-316-8872 >> D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 >> E. mnaser at vexxhost.com >> W. http://vexxhost.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Foundation mailing list >> Foundation at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation >> _______________________________________________ >> Foundation mailing list >> Foundation at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > > -- > Doug > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From doug at doughellmann.com Tue Mar 12 22:39:20 2019 From: doug at doughellmann.com (Doug Hellmann) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:39:20 -0400 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> References: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> Message-ID: Jonathan Bryce writes: >> On Mar 12, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> writes: >> >>> Mohammed, >>> Is the goal to have a doc where we collect feedback per pilot project from Board? TC? Community? >> >> We were asked specifically about the process the TC preferred for being >> involved in the evaluation of new OIP applications, in order to handle >> the step where the leadership groups of other confirmed projects have a >> chance to provide their input. > > Thanks for chiming in here Doug. This specific request is to the TC as the process allows for official input from other confirmed projects’ governance bodies when a new project is being considered for confirmation. This could be anything from a simple email to me and Alan, a formal resolution from the TC, or even a decision to not have an opinion. Since we’re just setting up this process, I was hoping to hear how the TC would like to be involved so we can make that part of the workflow for each of the projects that come up. > > We will be having the next Board meeting on April 8 (4 weeks from yesterday), where we will do an initial review of pilot projects that wish to apply. At this point, that could include Kata Containers and Zuul, although we are just starting to work with the projects on their portion of the confirmation process. I think if the TC wishes to provide feedback on either of those projects, it would be ideal to have it ahead of the April 8th meeting. > > Jonathan Can you give us an idea of what format that review meeting will take? Is the team going to put together a slide deck, for example? Having whatever materials they will be presenting available for the TC to review seems like a good start, although I don't know whether that's possible given the current schedule. What sorts of input would the board be interested in hearing? Are there specific questions, or is it more a matter of looking for general comments? -- Doug From rv6848 at att.com Wed Mar 13 14:13:47 2019 From: rv6848 at att.com (VAN WYK, RYAN L) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:13:47 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> Message-ID: <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50A56509@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com> Jonathan, is the intention to have the TSC weigh in on every Pilot project as a point of process, or rather to have a mechanism for them to provide the OSF staff supporting the project direct feedback where the TSC has observed the work product of the project itself (code, wiki, website, summit presentations etc.)? Given the TSC does not govern these projects, the former might not make sense. Thanks, Ryan van Wyk -----Original Message----- From: Doug Hellmann Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 5:39 PM To: Jonathan Bryce ; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects Jonathan Bryce writes: >> On Mar 12, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> writes: >> >>> Mohammed, >>> Is the goal to have a doc where we collect feedback per pilot project from Board? TC? Community? >> >> We were asked specifically about the process the TC preferred for >> being involved in the evaluation of new OIP applications, in order to >> handle the step where the leadership groups of other confirmed >> projects have a chance to provide their input. > > Thanks for chiming in here Doug. This specific request is to the TC as the process allows for official input from other confirmed projects’ governance bodies when a new project is being considered for confirmation. This could be anything from a simple email to me and Alan, a formal resolution from the TC, or even a decision to not have an opinion. Since we’re just setting up this process, I was hoping to hear how the TC would like to be involved so we can make that part of the workflow for each of the projects that come up. > > We will be having the next Board meeting on April 8 (4 weeks from yesterday), where we will do an initial review of pilot projects that wish to apply. At this point, that could include Kata Containers and Zuul, although we are just starting to work with the projects on their portion of the confirmation process. I think if the TC wishes to provide feedback on either of those projects, it would be ideal to have it ahead of the April 8th meeting. > > Jonathan Can you give us an idea of what format that review meeting will take? Is the team going to put together a slide deck, for example? Having whatever materials they will be presenting available for the TC to review seems like a good start, although I don't know whether that's possible given the current schedule. What sorts of input would the board be interested in hearing? Are there specific questions, or is it more a matter of looking for general comments? -- Doug _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=zTWTiC7wOaN7yysfRF_30GJuae7Hwfl1v4rkhzv_NVQ&s=I1vHED6_djGdBf7BfiWr3imetDaZh8-Nb_vHXBLZ-EA&e= From jonathan at openstack.org Fri Mar 15 18:44:24 2019 From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:44:24 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> Message-ID: > On Mar 12, 2019, at 5:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Jonathan Bryce writes: > >>> On Mar 12, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> >>> writes: >>> >>>> Mohammed, >>>> Is the goal to have a doc where we collect feedback per pilot project from Board? TC? Community? >>> >>> We were asked specifically about the process the TC preferred for being >>> involved in the evaluation of new OIP applications, in order to handle >>> the step where the leadership groups of other confirmed projects have a >>> chance to provide their input. >> >> Thanks for chiming in here Doug. This specific request is to the TC as the process allows for official input from other confirmed projects’ governance bodies when a new project is being considered for confirmation. This could be anything from a simple email to me and Alan, a formal resolution from the TC, or even a decision to not have an opinion. Since we’re just setting up this process, I was hoping to hear how the TC would like to be involved so we can make that part of the workflow for each of the projects that come up. >> >> We will be having the next Board meeting on April 8 (4 weeks from yesterday), where we will do an initial review of pilot projects that wish to apply. At this point, that could include Kata Containers and Zuul, although we are just starting to work with the projects on their portion of the confirmation process. I think if the TC wishes to provide feedback on either of those projects, it would be ideal to have it ahead of the April 8th meeting. >> >> Jonathan > > Can you give us an idea of what format that review meeting will take? Is > the team going to put together a slide deck, for example? Having > whatever materials they will be presenting available for the TC to > review seems like a good start, although I don't know whether that's > possible given the current schedule. The projects are currently preparing slide decks to present during the review meeting. I think it’s unlikely that they will be ready very far in advance of the meeting, but I can check on the progress and timeline. > What sorts of input would the board be interested in hearing? Are there > specific questions, or is it more a matter of looking for general > comments? I’d love to have any of the board members chime in on this one, but I’ll also share my perspective. This request is admittedly open-ended since it’s intended to allow for a wide variety of projects to come through the process. If we look at the cases of Kata Containers and Zuul specifically, I could see the TC having some general thoughts (or not) about Kata Containers and potential integration with OpenStack projects or how it fits technically into an open source cloud landscape. For Zuul, I would imagine there might be a more detailed level of opinion or comment that the TC might have given the origin of Zuul and the continued extensive use as part of the OpenStack project development process. Perhaps things like support for the utility of Zuul as a major user, comments on the developer experience of the project. The model for this in my mind is the amicus curiae brief that is submitted to a court when a third party feels like they may have helpful additional information or perspective to guide a decision. Jonathan From jonathan at openstack.org Fri Mar 15 18:52:18 2019 From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:52:18 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50A56509@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com> References: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50A56509@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com> Message-ID: <0B03427A-98C0-4631-AD5E-4381C694A49B@openstack.org> > On Mar 13, 2019, at 9:13 AM, VAN WYK, RYAN L wrote: > > Jonathan, is the intention to have the TSC weigh in on every Pilot project as a point of process, or rather to have a mechanism for them to provide the OSF staff supporting the project direct feedback where the TSC has observed the work product of the project itself (code, wiki, website, summit presentations etc.)? > > Given the TSC does not govern these projects, the former might not make sense. It’s an optional opportunity for the governance bodies of confirmed projects to share information with the Board when new projects come up for confirmation. The Board definitely holds the final decision, but I think that the TC or (other groups) can provide useful input and perspective, especially in cases where there is a tighter connection between new projects and existing projects. In my earlier email, I mentioned the example of Zuul, which for most of its life lived under TC governance and still today is a critical component of the development process for the projects the TC governs. While the TC will not have the final decision on Zuul’s confirmation, it could provide a valuable perspective on the importance of Zuul as a project and any thoughts on the Zuul’s confirmation as a standalone top level project. To your other point, we on staff currently do get quite a bit of feedback on the pilot projects. It’s been very helpful and useful and we in turn pass it along and try to work with the projects directly. As we make some updates to our online information around the OSF and pilot projects, I like your idea of making an explicit request/mechanism for that kind of feedback to happen on an ongoing basis. I always prefer to get feedback sooner in the process while there’s more time to act on it. Jonathan > Thanks, > > Ryan van Wyk > > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Hellmann > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 5:39 PM > To: Jonathan Bryce ; foundation at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects > > Jonathan Bryce writes: > >>> On Mar 12, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> >>> writes: >>> >>>> Mohammed, >>>> Is the goal to have a doc where we collect feedback per pilot project from Board? TC? Community? >>> >>> We were asked specifically about the process the TC preferred for >>> being involved in the evaluation of new OIP applications, in order to >>> handle the step where the leadership groups of other confirmed >>> projects have a chance to provide their input. >> >> Thanks for chiming in here Doug. This specific request is to the TC as the process allows for official input from other confirmed projects’ governance bodies when a new project is being considered for confirmation. This could be anything from a simple email to me and Alan, a formal resolution from the TC, or even a decision to not have an opinion. Since we’re just setting up this process, I was hoping to hear how the TC would like to be involved so we can make that part of the workflow for each of the projects that come up. >> >> We will be having the next Board meeting on April 8 (4 weeks from yesterday), where we will do an initial review of pilot projects that wish to apply. At this point, that could include Kata Containers and Zuul, although we are just starting to work with the projects on their portion of the confirmation process. I think if the TC wishes to provide feedback on either of those projects, it would be ideal to have it ahead of the April 8th meeting. >> >> Jonathan > > Can you give us an idea of what format that review meeting will take? Is the team going to put together a slide deck, for example? Having whatever materials they will be presenting available for the TC to review seems like a good start, although I don't know whether that's possible given the current schedule. > > What sorts of input would the board be interested in hearing? Are there specific questions, or is it more a matter of looking for general comments? > > -- > Doug > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=zTWTiC7wOaN7yysfRF_30GJuae7Hwfl1v4rkhzv_NVQ&s=I1vHED6_djGdBf7BfiWr3imetDaZh8-Nb_vHXBLZ-EA&e= > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From thierry at openstack.org Mon Mar 18 09:55:22 2019 From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:55:22 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> Message-ID: Jonathan Bryce wrote: >> On Mar 12, 2019, at 5:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> What sorts of input would the board be interested in hearing? Are there >> specific questions, or is it more a matter of looking for general >> comments? > > I’d love to have any of the board members chime in on this one, but I’ll also share my perspective. This request is admittedly open-ended since it’s intended to allow for a wide variety of projects to come through the process. If we look at the cases of Kata Containers and Zuul specifically, I could see the TC having some general thoughts (or not) about Kata Containers and potential integration with OpenStack projects or how it fits technically into an open source cloud landscape. For Zuul, I would imagine there might be a more detailed level of opinion or comment that the TC might have given the origin of Zuul and the continued extensive use as part of the OpenStack project development process. Perhaps things like support for the utility of Zuul as a major user, comments on the developer experience of the project. Beyond providing technical input to help the Board assess integration and complementarity between technologies, I think that a body like the OpenStack Technical Committee can provide advice in two other areas: 1- The TC has practical experience of open collaboration under the "Four opens", and has derived a number of principles from them. It could therefore provide input to help the Board assess how well a pilot project fits the Open collaboration model, or how it seems to diverge from the OpenStack's implementation of the Four Opens. 2- OpenStack stands on strong technical best practices (like gating), that helped facilitate open collaboration and high QA levels. The TC could also help assess best practices in areas like documentation, internationalization, code review, testing, CI/CD, bug handling, or vulnerability management. While members of the Board are without doubt very technical, the Board of Directors as a body is better equipped to evaluate strategic focus or active engagement. It will IMHO benefit from input from others to evaluate open collaboration or technical best practices -- this is where other technical bodies from already-confirmed projects can help. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Mon Mar 18 14:12:06 2019 From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:12:06 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> Message-ID: <5a1c1cc8ea214b6baef5693d4725881e@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> Agree with your two points. I suggest we also add a third one that maybe applicable to only a subset of pilot projects. That is overlap and differences between existing projects in OpenStack and Pilot projects. Thanks, Arkady -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Carrez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 4:55 AM To: foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Jonathan Bryce wrote: >> On Mar 12, 2019, at 5:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> What sorts of input would the board be interested in hearing? Are >> there specific questions, or is it more a matter of looking for >> general comments? > > I’d love to have any of the board members chime in on this one, but I’ll also share my perspective. This request is admittedly open-ended since it’s intended to allow for a wide variety of projects to come through the process. If we look at the cases of Kata Containers and Zuul specifically, I could see the TC having some general thoughts (or not) about Kata Containers and potential integration with OpenStack projects or how it fits technically into an open source cloud landscape. For Zuul, I would imagine there might be a more detailed level of opinion or comment that the TC might have given the origin of Zuul and the continued extensive use as part of the OpenStack project development process. Perhaps things like support for the utility of Zuul as a major user, comments on the developer experience of the project. Beyond providing technical input to help the Board assess integration and complementarity between technologies, I think that a body like the OpenStack Technical Committee can provide advice in two other areas: 1- The TC has practical experience of open collaboration under the "Four opens", and has derived a number of principles from them. It could therefore provide input to help the Board assess how well a pilot project fits the Open collaboration model, or how it seems to diverge from the OpenStack's implementation of the Four Opens. 2- OpenStack stands on strong technical best practices (like gating), that helped facilitate open collaboration and high QA levels. The TC could also help assess best practices in areas like documentation, internationalization, code review, testing, CI/CD, bug handling, or vulnerability management. While members of the Board are without doubt very technical, the Board of Directors as a body is better equipped to evaluate strategic focus or active engagement. It will IMHO benefit from input from others to evaluate open collaboration or technical best practices -- this is where other technical bodies from already-confirmed projects can help. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From doug at doughellmann.com Mon Mar 18 14:45:55 2019 From: doug at doughellmann.com (Doug Hellmann) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:45:55 -0400 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] establishing channel for optional feedback re: pilot projects In-Reply-To: References: <4C78972D-AD4B-4643-BE2C-687CCC01CFC0@openstack.org> Message-ID: Thierry Carrez writes: > Jonathan Bryce wrote: >>> On Mar 12, 2019, at 5:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> What sorts of input would the board be interested in hearing? Are there >>> specific questions, or is it more a matter of looking for general >>> comments? >> >> I’d love to have any of the board members chime in on this one, but I’ll also share my perspective. This request is admittedly open-ended since it’s intended to allow for a wide variety of projects to come through the process. If we look at the cases of Kata Containers and Zuul specifically, I could see the TC having some general thoughts (or not) about Kata Containers and potential integration with OpenStack projects or how it fits technically into an open source cloud landscape. For Zuul, I would imagine there might be a more detailed level of opinion or comment that the TC might have given the origin of Zuul and the continued extensive use as part of the OpenStack project development process. Perhaps things like support for the utility of Zuul as a major user, comments on the developer experience of the project. > > Beyond providing technical input to help the Board assess integration > and complementarity between technologies, I think that a body like the > OpenStack Technical Committee can provide advice in two other areas: > > 1- The TC has practical experience of open collaboration under the "Four > opens", and has derived a number of principles from them. It could > therefore provide input to help the Board assess how well a pilot > project fits the Open collaboration model, or how it seems to diverge > from the OpenStack's implementation of the Four Opens. > > 2- OpenStack stands on strong technical best practices (like gating), > that helped facilitate open collaboration and high QA levels. > The TC could also help assess best practices in areas like > documentation, internationalization, code review, testing, CI/CD, bug > handling, or vulnerability management. > > While members of the Board are without doubt very technical, the Board > of Directors as a body is better equipped to evaluate strategic focus or > active engagement. It will IMHO benefit from input from others to > evaluate open collaboration or technical best practices -- this is where > other technical bodies from already-confirmed projects can help. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation That all makes sense. As far as the process, I think because of the asynchronous nature of a lot of what the TC does, it's going to work best to have *something* in writing to be evaluated. That doesn't necessarily need to be the slide deck that would be presented to the board, but it could be. And then I assume the Board and Foundation staff would prefer to have the results from the TC in some written form as well. So, maybe if whoever is shepherding the new project coordinates with the TC chair (or, more likely, someone the chair appoints), we can ensure that an evaluation happens in a timely manner and doesn't hold up the process. -- Doug From claire at openstack.org Mon Mar 18 15:14:52 2019 From: claire at openstack.org (claire at openstack.org) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:14:52 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Invitation: OpenStack Foundation Board Meeting @ Mon Apr 8, 2019 9am - 11am (CDT) (foundation@lists.openstack.org) Message-ID: <000000000000a99d1705845fd972@google.com> You have been invited to the following event. Title: OpenStack Foundation Board Meeting https://zoom.us/j/9574980705 Topics for this meeting: 1) Project confirmation previews This is the principle topic and focus for this meeting. 2) Bylaws update proposal Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/8April2019BoardMeeting When: Mon Apr 8, 2019 9am – 11am Central Time - Chicago Where: https://zoom.us/j/9574980705 Calendar: foundation at lists.openstack.org Who: * claire at openstack.org - organizer * foundation at lists.openstack.org Event details: https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=Xzc0cGs4ZGk1NjhvajhiOW02NHFqMGI5azhjb2syYjlvNm9xM2diOW42aDFrMmQ5aThwMGs0aGhpNzQgZm91bmRhdGlvbkBsaXN0cy5vcGVuc3RhY2sub3Jn&tok=MjAjY2xhaXJlQG9wZW5zdGFjay5vcmczNGQwZDY2MGE5OTU3MzE2MWJjYTZiNmMxNjQwZTUxOWQzOWViOTIz&ctz=America%2FChicago&hl=en&es=0 Invitation from Google Calendar: https://www.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this courtesy email at the account foundation at lists.openstack.org because you are an attendee of this event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at https://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification settings for your entire calendar. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to modify your RSVP response. Learn more at https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 1880 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: invite.ics Type: application/ics Size: 1925 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lauren at openstack.org Fri Mar 22 20:20:00 2019 From: lauren at openstack.org (Lauren Sell) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:20:00 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Personal news & see you in Denver Message-ID: Hi everyone, I have bittersweet news. After 9 years working with the OpenStack community, it’s time for the next chapter in my career. I’ll be wrapping up my work at the Foundation over the coming weeks, but the good news is that we’ve built a strong bench at the Foundation to continue executing on our mission! This community means so much to me, and I’ve enjoyed this job and working with all of you more than I can express. We spend a significant amount of our lives working, which is why I feel so fortunate to love my work and the people I work with. And from Snowden to Snowpenstack, it definitely hasn’t been boring! I can’t emphasize enough how this is a true community. It’s not just open source code. It’s not just a bunch of logos on a slide. It’s a group of people who have built an incredible platform and culture of collaboration. We’ve had some really amazing wins and some tough days, but we’ve been in it together and have made such a huge impact on the industry. Most of all, I’m proud that we’ve always gone high and stuck to our values, even when others try to tear us down. I’m FULLY invested in and passionate about this community and will do everything in my power to continue contributing and supporting everyone. In fact, I will be at the Denver Summit to cheer everyone on and help where I can, so please say hi and selfishly come celebrate my birthday with me on Tuesday the 30th :) Going forward, if you need anything from the Foundation marketing team, please reach out to marketing at openstack.org to reach Wes Wilson, Allison Price and others. And of course Jonathan and Mark are always available to help with anything. Thank you again for all of your work, your support, your friendship. If we don’t catch up in Denver, I’m always a phone call or DM or email away. Please don’t hesitate to reach out! All the best, Lauren Personal contact info: email: laurenenis at gmail.com cell: 713-398-8700 Twitter: @laurensell Wechat: laurenlynsell From jonathan at openstack.org Fri Mar 22 20:44:48 2019 From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:44:48 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Personal news & see you in Denver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Lauren has been involved in OpenStack since before we had a name for it and had such a huge impact over the last 9 years, including helping us define our open infrastructure strategy over the last couple of years. She’s also built out a great team, and we're very excited to continue working on the awesome new opportunities ahead. We’ll definitely miss her contributions and her (often unintentional) hilarity, but I know she’ll always be a Stacker no matter where she goes. Thanks for everything you’ve done in the community, Lauren! Jonathan P.S. If you’re on WeChat, Lauren loves stickers, so send her new ones. = ) > On Mar 22, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Lauren Sell wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I have bittersweet news. After 9 years working with the OpenStack community, it’s time for the next chapter in my career. I’ll be wrapping up my work at the Foundation over the coming weeks, but the good news is that we’ve built a strong bench at the Foundation to continue executing on our mission! > > This community means so much to me, and I’ve enjoyed this job and working with all of you more than I can express. We spend a significant amount of our lives working, which is why I feel so fortunate to love my work and the people I work with. And from Snowden to Snowpenstack, it definitely hasn’t been boring! > > I can’t emphasize enough how this is a true community. It’s not just open source code. It’s not just a bunch of logos on a slide. It’s a group of people who have built an incredible platform and culture of collaboration. We’ve had some really amazing wins and some tough days, but we’ve been in it together and have made such a huge impact on the industry. Most of all, I’m proud that we’ve always gone high and stuck to our values, even when others try to tear us down. > > I’m FULLY invested in and passionate about this community and will do everything in my power to continue contributing and supporting everyone. In fact, I will be at the Denver Summit to cheer everyone on and help where I can, so please say hi and selfishly come celebrate my birthday with me on Tuesday the 30th :) > > Going forward, if you need anything from the Foundation marketing team, please reach out to marketing at openstack.org to reach Wes Wilson, Allison Price and others. And of course Jonathan and Mark are always available to help with anything. > > Thank you again for all of your work, your support, your friendship. If we don’t catch up in Denver, I’m always a phone call or DM or email away. Please don’t hesitate to reach out! > > All the best, > Lauren > > Personal contact info: > email: laurenenis at gmail.com > cell: 713-398-8700 > Twitter: @laurensell > Wechat: laurenlynsell > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From mark at openstack.org Fri Mar 22 23:17:31 2019 From: mark at openstack.org (Mark Collier) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:17:31 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Personal news & see you in Denver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <169a7b1f2f8.27be.6c47a7e13dc6dbbaf5b2f145b8976162@openstack.org> Lauren, I've witnesses first hand how your contributions to openstack have meant so much to so many people in this community, all over the world. Early on we laid out what seemed (to me) like ambitious goals, like building a community of dozens of people from 5 or 6 companies, to build some open source software components in hopes of ensuring that open source was a credible force in the future of automated cloud infrastructure. I quickly realized that with your insatiable ambition and belief in our mission, unparalleled creative thinking, and compassion for the people we serve, our initial goals were actually conservative! Take it from me: no one sets the bar higher than Lauren Sell! I've never seen anything like it in my [checks calendar] pretty darn long career. Here we are 9 years later, with 100,000 members in 187 countries, with an open source developer community that in 2018 alone was one of the 3 most active on the planet! Right up their with the Linux kernel and Chromium. Wow! Had I known the force of nature we had on our side with Lauren, we'd never have aimed so low :) I know, I know... No one person made this happen. That's the whole point of the power of our community, right? But I'm not going to pass up the opportunity to recognize Lauren for being, in my humble (yet fixed) opinion a unique and singular force, without which I firmly believe we'd never be where we are today. A world where open source is more ubiqiutous than ever, with greater participation across users, developers, and massive multi billion dollar ecosystems. In summary: no one raises the bar like Lauren Sell. She a leader in open source, a leader in tech, and a leader in whatever she puts her mind to. She also happens to be a friend, and an all around bad ass, who I know I can always rely on. I know many of you know exactly what I'm talking about. We fully expect to see you in Denver, and to cheer you on in your next journey, wherever that takes you! Mark On March 22, 2019 3:20:36 PM Lauren Sell wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have bittersweet news. After 9 years working with the OpenStack > community, it’s time for the next chapter in my career. I’ll be wrapping up > my work at the Foundation over the coming weeks, but the good news is that > we’ve built a strong bench at the Foundation to continue executing on our > mission! > > This community means so much to me, and I’ve enjoyed this job and working > with all of you more than I can express. We spend a significant amount of > our lives working, which is why I feel so fortunate to love my work and the > people I work with. And from Snowden to Snowpenstack, it definitely hasn’t > been boring! > > I can’t emphasize enough how this is a true community. It’s not just open > source code. It’s not just a bunch of logos on a slide. It’s a group of > people who have built an incredible platform and culture of collaboration. > We’ve had some really amazing wins and some tough days, but we’ve been in > it together and have made such a huge impact on the industry. Most of all, > I’m proud that we’ve always gone high and stuck to our values, even when > others try to tear us down. > > I’m FULLY invested in and passionate about this community and will do > everything in my power to continue contributing and supporting everyone. In > fact, I will be at the Denver Summit to cheer everyone on and help where I > can, so please say hi and selfishly come celebrate my birthday with me on > Tuesday the 30th :) > > Going forward, if you need anything from the Foundation marketing team, > please reach out to marketing at openstack.org to reach Wes Wilson, Allison > Price and others. And of course Jonathan and Mark are always available to > help with anything. > > Thank you again for all of your work, your support, your friendship. If we > don’t catch up in Denver, I’m always a phone call or DM or email away. > Please don’t hesitate to reach out! > > All the best, > Lauren > > Personal contact info: > email: laurenenis at gmail.com > cell: 713-398-8700 > Twitter: @laurensell > Wechat: laurenlynsell > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From bluejay.ahn at gmail.com Sat Mar 23 00:23:46 2019 From: bluejay.ahn at gmail.com (Jaesuk Ahn) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:23:46 +0900 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Personal news & see you in Denver In-Reply-To: <169a7b1f2f8.27be.6c47a7e13dc6dbbaf5b2f145b8976162@openstack.org> References: <169a7b1f2f8.27be.6c47a7e13dc6dbbaf5b2f145b8976162@openstack.org> Message-ID: Lauren, You have been the best of best for this community. I sincerely appreciate everything you have done for us, especially for the community here in Korea. You have been a strong supporter and friend to grow this community. Personally, it has been great joy to work with you. :) I will be in Denver, celebrating your birthday and beginning of new chapter in your life. P.S. Lauren, unfortunately, I am not on WeChat. But, if you’re on kakao chat, I can send you a great stickers. = ) On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:21 AM Mark Collier wrote: > Lauren, > > I've witnesses first hand how your contributions to openstack have meant > so > much to so many people in this community, all over the world. > > Early on we laid out what seemed (to me) like ambitious goals, like > building a community of dozens of people from 5 or 6 companies, to build > some open source software components in hopes of ensuring that open source > was a credible force in the future of automated cloud infrastructure. > > I quickly realized that with your insatiable ambition and belief in our > mission, unparalleled creative thinking, and compassion for the people we > serve, our initial goals were actually conservative! Take it from me: no > one sets the bar higher than Lauren Sell! I've never seen anything like it > in my [checks calendar] pretty darn long career. > > Here we are 9 years later, with 100,000 members in 187 countries, with an > open source developer community that in 2018 alone was one of the 3 most > active on the planet! Right up their with the Linux kernel and Chromium. > Wow! > > Had I known the force of nature we had on our side with Lauren, we'd never > have aimed so low :) > > I know, I know... No one person made this happen. That's the whole point > of > the power of our community, right? But I'm not going to pass up the > opportunity to recognize Lauren for being, in my humble (yet fixed) > opinion > a unique and singular force, without which I firmly believe we'd never be > where we are today. A world where open source is more ubiqiutous than > ever, > with greater participation across users, developers, and massive multi > billion dollar ecosystems. > > In summary: no one raises the bar like Lauren Sell. She a leader in open > source, a leader in tech, and a leader in whatever she puts her mind to. > > She also happens to be a friend, and an all around bad ass, who I know I > can always rely on. I know many of you know exactly what I'm talking about. > > We fully expect to see you in Denver, and to cheer you on in your next > journey, wherever that takes you! > > Mark > > > On March 22, 2019 3:20:36 PM Lauren Sell wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have bittersweet news. After 9 years working with the OpenStack > > community, it’s time for the next chapter in my career. I’ll be wrapping > up > > my work at the Foundation over the coming weeks, but the good news is > that > > we’ve built a strong bench at the Foundation to continue executing on > our > > mission! > > > > This community means so much to me, and I’ve enjoyed this job and > working > > with all of you more than I can express. We spend a significant amount > of > > our lives working, which is why I feel so fortunate to love my work and > the > > people I work with. And from Snowden to Snowpenstack, it definitely > hasn’t > > been boring! > > > > I can’t emphasize enough how this is a true community. It’s not just > open > > source code. It’s not just a bunch of logos on a slide. It’s a group of > > people who have built an incredible platform and culture of > collaboration. > > We’ve had some really amazing wins and some tough days, but we’ve been > in > > it together and have made such a huge impact on the industry. Most of > all, > > I’m proud that we’ve always gone high and stuck to our values, even when > > others try to tear us down. > > > > I’m FULLY invested in and passionate about this community and will do > > everything in my power to continue contributing and supporting everyone. > In > > fact, I will be at the Denver Summit to cheer everyone on and help where > I > > can, so please say hi and selfishly come celebrate my birthday with me > on > > Tuesday the 30th :) > > > > Going forward, if you need anything from the Foundation marketing team, > > please reach out to marketing at openstack.org to reach Wes Wilson, > Allison > > Price and others. And of course Jonathan and Mark are always available > to > > help with anything. > > > > Thank you again for all of your work, your support, your friendship. If > we > > don’t catch up in Denver, I’m always a phone call or DM or email away. > > Please don’t hesitate to reach out! > > > > All the best, > > Lauren > > > > Personal contact info: > > email: laurenenis at gmail.com > > cell: 713-398-8700 > > Twitter: @laurensell > > Wechat: laurenlynsell > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Foundation mailing list > > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > -- *Jaesuk Ahn*, Ph.D. Software R&D Center, SK Telecom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joseph.w at inwinstack.com Sat Mar 23 17:02:30 2019 From: joseph.w at inwinstack.com (=?UTF-8?B?546L5oOg5rCR?=) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 01:02:30 +0800 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Personal news & see you in Denver In-Reply-To: References: <169a7b1f2f8.27be.6c47a7e13dc6dbbaf5b2f145b8976162@openstack.org> Message-ID: Lauren Thank you very much for all your efforts, we will miss you. Good luck and please keep in contact. Best regards Joseph Wang inwinSTACK Jaesuk Ahn 於 2019年3月23日 週六 上午8:26 寫道: > Lauren, > > You have been the best of best for this community. > I sincerely appreciate everything you have done for us, especially for the > community here in Korea. > > You have been a strong supporter and friend to grow this community. > Personally, it has been great joy to work with you. :) > > I will be in Denver, celebrating your birthday and beginning of new > chapter in your life. > > > P.S. Lauren, unfortunately, I am not on WeChat. But, if you’re on kakao > chat, I can send you a great stickers. = ) > > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:21 AM Mark Collier wrote: > >> Lauren, >> >> I've witnesses first hand how your contributions to openstack have meant >> so >> much to so many people in this community, all over the world. >> >> Early on we laid out what seemed (to me) like ambitious goals, like >> building a community of dozens of people from 5 or 6 companies, to build >> some open source software components in hopes of ensuring that open >> source >> was a credible force in the future of automated cloud infrastructure. >> >> I quickly realized that with your insatiable ambition and belief in our >> mission, unparalleled creative thinking, and compassion for the people we >> serve, our initial goals were actually conservative! Take it from me: no >> one sets the bar higher than Lauren Sell! I've never seen anything like >> it >> in my [checks calendar] pretty darn long career. >> >> Here we are 9 years later, with 100,000 members in 187 countries, with an >> open source developer community that in 2018 alone was one of the 3 most >> active on the planet! Right up their with the Linux kernel and Chromium. >> Wow! >> >> Had I known the force of nature we had on our side with Lauren, we'd >> never >> have aimed so low :) >> >> I know, I know... No one person made this happen. That's the whole point >> of >> the power of our community, right? But I'm not going to pass up the >> opportunity to recognize Lauren for being, in my humble (yet fixed) >> opinion >> a unique and singular force, without which I firmly believe we'd never be >> where we are today. A world where open source is more ubiqiutous than >> ever, >> with greater participation across users, developers, and massive multi >> billion dollar ecosystems. >> >> In summary: no one raises the bar like Lauren Sell. She a leader in open >> source, a leader in tech, and a leader in whatever she puts her mind to. >> >> She also happens to be a friend, and an all around bad ass, who I know I >> can always rely on. I know many of you know exactly what I'm talking >> about. >> >> We fully expect to see you in Denver, and to cheer you on in your next >> journey, wherever that takes you! >> >> Mark >> >> >> On March 22, 2019 3:20:36 PM Lauren Sell wrote: >> >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > I have bittersweet news. After 9 years working with the OpenStack >> > community, it’s time for the next chapter in my career. I’ll be >> wrapping up >> > my work at the Foundation over the coming weeks, but the good news is >> that >> > we’ve built a strong bench at the Foundation to continue executing on >> our >> > mission! >> > >> > This community means so much to me, and I’ve enjoyed this job and >> working >> > with all of you more than I can express. We spend a significant amount >> of >> > our lives working, which is why I feel so fortunate to love my work and >> the >> > people I work with. And from Snowden to Snowpenstack, it definitely >> hasn’t >> > been boring! >> > >> > I can’t emphasize enough how this is a true community. It’s not just >> open >> > source code. It’s not just a bunch of logos on a slide. It’s a group of >> > people who have built an incredible platform and culture of >> collaboration. >> > We’ve had some really amazing wins and some tough days, but we’ve been >> in >> > it together and have made such a huge impact on the industry. Most of >> all, >> > I’m proud that we’ve always gone high and stuck to our values, even >> when >> > others try to tear us down. >> > >> > I’m FULLY invested in and passionate about this community and will do >> > everything in my power to continue contributing and supporting >> everyone. In >> > fact, I will be at the Denver Summit to cheer everyone on and help >> where I >> > can, so please say hi and selfishly come celebrate my birthday with me >> on >> > Tuesday the 30th :) >> > >> > Going forward, if you need anything from the Foundation marketing team, >> > please reach out to marketing at openstack.org to reach Wes Wilson, >> Allison >> > Price and others. And of course Jonathan and Mark are always available >> to >> > help with anything. >> > >> > Thank you again for all of your work, your support, your friendship. If >> we >> > don’t catch up in Denver, I’m always a phone call or DM or email away. >> > Please don’t hesitate to reach out! >> > >> > All the best, >> > Lauren >> > >> > Personal contact info: >> > email: laurenenis at gmail.com >> > cell: 713-398-8700 >> > Twitter: @laurensell >> > Wechat: laurenlynsell >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Foundation mailing list >> > Foundation at lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Foundation mailing list >> Foundation at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation >> > > > -- > *Jaesuk Ahn*, Ph.D. > Software R&D Center, SK Telecom > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lnamphy at gmail.com Sat Mar 23 18:59:07 2019 From: lnamphy at gmail.com (Lisa-Marie Namphy) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:59:07 -0700 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Personal news & see you in Denver In-Reply-To: References: <169a7b1f2f8.27be.6c47a7e13dc6dbbaf5b2f145b8976162@openstack.org> Message-ID: Lauren, It has been fantastic to work with you all these years! +1 to everything Mark said (and wow! What a tribute! Well deserved and so well said!!!) Thank you for your leadership in the community and Ambassador programs, and for your help creating the AUC and giving the User Groups the forums to get important work done. I have really enjoyed collaborating with you. And I hope you are staying “in the family” so that our paths can continue to cross in a significant way! (Does anyone ever really leave open source?) #Community! ;) Congratulations on whatever your new new thing is. They are lucky to have you! And yes, we will raise a glass a mile high on your birthday!!!! :) Thanks, and cheers to my sister and partner-in-open-source crime! ;) Abrazos y besos, Lisa > On Mar 23, 2019, at 10:02 AM, 王惠民 wrote: > > Lauren > > Thank you very much for all your efforts, we will miss you. Good luck and please keep in contact. > > > > Best regards > Joseph Wang > inwinSTACK > > Jaesuk Ahn > 於 2019年3月23日 週六 上午8:26 寫道: > Lauren, > > You have been the best of best for this community. > I sincerely appreciate everything you have done for us, especially for the community here in Korea. > > You have been a strong supporter and friend to grow this community. > Personally, it has been great joy to work with you. :) > > I will be in Denver, celebrating your birthday and beginning of new chapter in your life. > > > P.S. Lauren, unfortunately, I am not on WeChat. But, if you’re on kakao chat, I can send you a great stickers. = ) > > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:21 AM Mark Collier > wrote: > Lauren, > > I've witnesses first hand how your contributions to openstack have meant so > much to so many people in this community, all over the world. > > Early on we laid out what seemed (to me) like ambitious goals, like > building a community of dozens of people from 5 or 6 companies, to build > some open source software components in hopes of ensuring that open source > was a credible force in the future of automated cloud infrastructure. > > I quickly realized that with your insatiable ambition and belief in our > mission, unparalleled creative thinking, and compassion for the people we > serve, our initial goals were actually conservative! Take it from me: no > one sets the bar higher than Lauren Sell! I've never seen anything like it > in my [checks calendar] pretty darn long career. > > Here we are 9 years later, with 100,000 members in 187 countries, with an > open source developer community that in 2018 alone was one of the 3 most > active on the planet! Right up their with the Linux kernel and Chromium. Wow! > > Had I known the force of nature we had on our side with Lauren, we'd never > have aimed so low :) > > I know, I know... No one person made this happen. That's the whole point of > the power of our community, right? But I'm not going to pass up the > opportunity to recognize Lauren for being, in my humble (yet fixed) opinion > a unique and singular force, without which I firmly believe we'd never be > where we are today. A world where open source is more ubiqiutous than ever, > with greater participation across users, developers, and massive multi > billion dollar ecosystems. > > In summary: no one raises the bar like Lauren Sell. She a leader in open > source, a leader in tech, and a leader in whatever she puts her mind to. > > She also happens to be a friend, and an all around bad ass, who I know I > can always rely on. I know many of you know exactly what I'm talking about. > > We fully expect to see you in Denver, and to cheer you on in your next > journey, wherever that takes you! > > Mark > > > On March 22, 2019 3:20:36 PM Lauren Sell > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have bittersweet news. After 9 years working with the OpenStack > > community, it’s time for the next chapter in my career. I’ll be wrapping up > > my work at the Foundation over the coming weeks, but the good news is that > > we’ve built a strong bench at the Foundation to continue executing on our > > mission! > > > > This community means so much to me, and I’ve enjoyed this job and working > > with all of you more than I can express. We spend a significant amount of > > our lives working, which is why I feel so fortunate to love my work and the > > people I work with. And from Snowden to Snowpenstack, it definitely hasn’t > > been boring! > > > > I can’t emphasize enough how this is a true community. It’s not just open > > source code. It’s not just a bunch of logos on a slide. It’s a group of > > people who have built an incredible platform and culture of collaboration. > > We’ve had some really amazing wins and some tough days, but we’ve been in > > it together and have made such a huge impact on the industry. Most of all, > > I’m proud that we’ve always gone high and stuck to our values, even when > > others try to tear us down. > > > > I’m FULLY invested in and passionate about this community and will do > > everything in my power to continue contributing and supporting everyone. In > > fact, I will be at the Denver Summit to cheer everyone on and help where I > > can, so please say hi and selfishly come celebrate my birthday with me on > > Tuesday the 30th :) > > > > Going forward, if you need anything from the Foundation marketing team, > > please reach out to marketing at openstack.org to reach Wes Wilson, Allison > > Price and others. And of course Jonathan and Mark are always available to > > help with anything. > > > > Thank you again for all of your work, your support, your friendship. If we > > don’t catch up in Denver, I’m always a phone call or DM or email away. > > Please don’t hesitate to reach out! > > > > All the best, > > Lauren > > > > Personal contact info: > > email: laurenenis at gmail.com > > cell: 713-398-8700 > > Twitter: @laurensell > > Wechat: laurenlynsell > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Foundation mailing list > > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > > > -- > Jaesuk Ahn, Ph.D. > Software R&D Center, SK Telecom > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: