Open Stack

+1. We need support open source.

Regards.
--
Shane
From: VAN WYK, RYAN L [mailto:rv6848 at att.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 4:34 AM
To: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>; Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>; Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>; Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

+1

Ryan van Wyk
Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Network Cloud Software Engineering

C: 312-860-0966
rv6848 at att.com<mailto:rv6848 at att.com>

Assistant: Lisa Selsor | 314.450.2687 | ls2276 at att.com<mailto:ls2276 at att.com>

From: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com<mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 2:16 PM
To: Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com<mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com<mailto:sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>>; Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com<mailto:davanum at gmail.com>>; Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org<mailto:thierry at openstack.org>>; foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

+1

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com<mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>> wrote:
+1

From: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com<mailto:sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM
To: Davanum Srinivas
Cc: Thierry Carrez; foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__opensource.org_node_966&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=W8w5hIzgYMF66XtsGkrNJjaUAkoD8mg-Dt__7Ufoxg0&e=>

According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
"will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".

[1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_OpenSourceOrg_status_1093546182465458177&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=JwEqxHdXZMbwzguEdLUBg9gI1q_1Siokv1uIlD3vUYU&e=>

I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
OSI affiliation.

I'd support this path +1 @ttx

+1 from me as well.
_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=zE3j6xshs02ZiE7wn4MOaUcsTNcvRTu_PZL74HRTCqs&e=>


--
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhillsman at gmail.com<mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>
mobile: (832) 264-2646
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190211/56ec867b/attachment-0001.html>