Open Stack

Maybe we need to see if there are any objections to signing up to the "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966

 

>From my side, it seems that this is consistent with the foundation’s principles.

 

Any concerns?

 

Tim

 

From: "VAN WYK, RYAN L" <rv6848 at att.com>
Date: Friday, 8 February 2019 at 21:35
To: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>, Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>, "<foundation at lists.openstack.org>" <foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

 

+1

 

Ryan van Wyk

Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Network Cloud Software Engineering

 

C: 312-860-0966

rv6848 at att.com

 

Assistant: Lisa Selsor | 314.450.2687 | ls2276 at att.com 

 

From: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 2:16 PM
To: Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>; Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>; Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

 

+1

 

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:

+1

 

From: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM
To: Davanum Srinivas
Cc: Thierry Carrez; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

 

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 

In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their 
recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966

According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they 
"will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".

[1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177

I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come 
with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to 
that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I 
propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation 
immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal 
OSI affiliation.

 

I'd support this path +1 @ttx

 

+1 from me as well.

_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation


 

-- 

Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman

mrhillsman at gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646

_______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/58eaacda/attachment.html>