From amy at demarco.com Wed Sep 5 19:41:45 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:41:45 -0700 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] Meeting cancelled September 10 Message-ID: Due to the PTG and OPS meetup next week in Denver I am cancelling the next meeting. If anyone would like to meet on-site please drop me an email and I'll be happy to meet. Thanks, Amy (spotz) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From messenger at webex.com Tue Sep 11 20:01:10 2018 From: messenger at webex.com (messenger at webex.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 20:01:10 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Training session reminder: OpenStack Board meeting Sept 18, 1pm to 3pm pacific Message-ID: <835592060.671421536696070636.JavaMail.nobody@grtx1rmd001.webex.com> Hello Foundation Mailing List, Alan Clark invites you to participate as an attendee in the OpenStack Board meeting: Topic: OpenStack Board meeting Sept 18, 1pm to 3pm pacific Host: Alan Clark Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 Time: 1:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco, GMT-07:00) Session number: 929 101 327 Session password: This session does not require a password. ------------------------------------------------------- To join the session ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=tb55cf338077843c7822608be035733b6 2. Enter your name and email address (or registration ID). 3. Enter the session password: This session does not require a password. 4. Click "Join Now". 5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen. To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=ta987051febc0409cb2cc7af32ef726ef ------------------------------------------------------- To join the session by phone only ------------------------------------------------------- To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the training session, or call the number below and enter the access code. Call-in toll number (US/Canada):1-650-479-3207 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada):1-855-244-8681 Having trouble dialing in? Try these backup numbers: Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada):1-855-244-8681 Call-in toll number (US/Canada):1-650-479-3207 Global call-in numbers: https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/globalcallin.php?serviceType=TC&ED=711052632&tollFree=1 Show toll-free dialing restrictions: https://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf Access code: 929 101 327 ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- You can contact Alan Clark at: aclark at suse.com To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=t771d7f825034f3818f1e2bc50ee75986 https://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This Webex service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your concerns with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do not join the session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject to discovery in the event of litigation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From messenger at webex.com Mon Sep 17 20:01:10 2018 From: messenger at webex.com (messenger at webex.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:01:10 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Training session reminder: OpenStack Board meeting Sept 18, 1pm to 3pm pacific Message-ID: <1075133800.3775051537214470695.JavaMail.nobody@rsj13rmd001.webex.com> Hello Foundation Mailing List, Alan Clark invites you to participate as an attendee in the OpenStack Board meeting: Topic: OpenStack Board meeting Sept 18, 1pm to 3pm pacific Host: Alan Clark Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 Time: 1:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco, GMT-07:00) Session number: 929 101 327 Session password: This session does not require a password. ------------------------------------------------------- To join the session ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=tb55cf338077843c7822608be035733b6 2. Enter your name and email address (or registration ID). 3. Enter the session password: This session does not require a password. 4. Click "Join Now". 5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen. To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=ta987051febc0409cb2cc7af32ef726ef ------------------------------------------------------- To join the session by phone only ------------------------------------------------------- To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the training session, or call the number below and enter the access code. Call-in toll number (US/Canada):1-650-479-3207 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada):1-855-244-8681 Having trouble dialing in? Try these backup numbers: Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada):1-855-244-8681 Call-in toll number (US/Canada):1-650-479-3207 Global call-in numbers: https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/globalcallin.php?serviceType=TC&ED=711052632&tollFree=1 Show toll-free dialing restrictions: https://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf Access code: 929 101 327 ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- You can contact Alan Clark at: aclark at suse.com To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=t771d7f825034f3818f1e2bc50ee75986 https://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This Webex service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your concerns with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do not join the session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject to discovery in the event of litigation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jonathan at openstack.org Thu Sep 20 22:24:10 2018 From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:24:10 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] September 18 Board of Directors Meeting Message-ID: On September 18, the OpenStack Foundation Board of Directors met via conference call. The agenda was posted on the wiki[1]. Almost all of the content meeting followed from presentations in a deck that is attached to this email as a PDF or available on Google Slides[2]. The meeting started out with an update from Lauren Sell on the state of the OpenStack market, including some recent data from analysts, as well as some data from the latest user survey that we are in the process of putting together. She also highlighted some new public user stories and case studies and provided some details about the state of the OpenStack public cloud global footprint. She then presented about the latest OpenStack software release, Rocky, some quick updates on the 4 OSF pilot projects, and a preview of the upcoming OpenStack “Open Infrastructure” Summit in Berlin. Finally she covered some activities underway right now, including opening an office in Shanghai, China and hiring our first full-time Chinese staff member, updates to the OpenStack website, and some content production that is being done in the community around HA and hybrid clouds. If you are interested in participating in the content process, contact Allison Price (allison at openstack.org). The slide deck also contains summaries of a dozen use cases for reference (pp. 30-33). After the initial update, Thierry Carrez and I dove into an update on the OSF open infrastructure project expansion and governance discussion. We went through a quick summary of the history of this initiative, which we kicked off last year as part of the community wide strategic review. I posted an update a few weeks ago to this list on the state of those discussions[3], and the presentation covered much of the same ground with additional detail and discussion of a few points. The goal was to get general agreement on the high level framework so that we can move forward with drafting up the necessary documents to implement a more formal and permanent structure for considering additional projects, as well as a confirmation process for our existing pilot projects. We had some good discussion and will be moving forward with several next steps, including holding a community meeting in the next few weeks, beginning to draft some Bylaws updates (we’ll post those to this list), and scheduling an additional Board call for October. Next, Mark Collier talked about some updates to the sponsorship and funding options for the OSF as we include additional projects. One of our goals is to minimize overhead and duplication, provide additional value to existing members, and open up the possibility to provide ongoing funding to new projects that come on. Mark presented two phases for feedback and input. The first phase takes our existing OpenStack project corporate sponsorship model and opens it up to other projects we’re hosting. For Foundation corporate members (Gold and Platinum members) they would be able to show their support for any project without paying additional fees. This model is targeted at the ongoing project-specific funding and leaves room for additional start up funding that may be useful to help with initial launch expenses. Phase one received general consensus and we’ll be moving forward with that. The second phase proposes the possible creation of a Silver corporate membership tier that could be desirable for companies who want to support multiple OSF projects, but do not necessarily want to join at the Gold or Platinum level. One major different from Gold and Platinum membership is that it would not have specific member class representation on the Board like the Individual, Platinum and Gold classes. There was quite a bit of discussion around this corporate membership option and most people agreed we needed to discuss it more. We wrapped up the meeting with a brief overview of some brand research we have been doing with an outside firm to try to gain a better understanding of the perception of OpenStack in the marketplace, see how people viewed foundations and their role in the open source landscape and where we could best help, and see if the “open infrastructure” concept is resonating as we start to use it more. We will be doing a deeper dive into this research in a couple of weeks with our outside experts (we’ll probably post the invite to the marketing list if you’re interested in following along). It was a packed meeting with a lot of content, but I feel like we had some very good discussions. I also noticed we had strong observer attendance on the call, so thanks to everyone who took the time to dial in and follow along. Feel free to reach out to me with any questions or comments. Thanks, Jonathan 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/18Sep2018BoardMeeting 2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10UyCpxkjPqC3kT-dYRpBxzNT39i2OhlggJvzGDosMz0/ 3. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-August/002617.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: BoardMeeting20180918.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 3663944 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Fri Sep 21 13:43:23 2018 From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:43:23 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] September 18 Board of Directors Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Jonathan, What does that mean that Ironic is core project? Not sure what process was used for it nor how we used old core nomenclature now. Thanks, Arkady -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jonathan at openstack.org] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 5:24 PM To: foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] September 18 Board of Directors Meeting [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive information. On September 18, the OpenStack Foundation Board of Directors met via conference call. The agenda was posted on the wiki[1]. Almost all of the content meeting followed from presentations in a deck that is attached to this email as a PDF or available on Google Slides[2]. The meeting started out with an update from Lauren Sell on the state of the OpenStack market, including some recent data from analysts, as well as some data from the latest user survey that we are in the process of putting together. She also highlighted some new public user stories and case studies and provided some details about the state of the OpenStack public cloud global footprint. She then presented about the latest OpenStack software release, Rocky, some quick updates on the 4 OSF pilot projects, and a preview of the upcoming OpenStack “Open Infrastructure” Summit in Berlin. Finally she covered some activities underway right now, including opening an office in Shanghai, China and hiring our first full-time Chinese staff member, updates to the OpenStack website, and some content production that is being done in the community around HA and hybrid clouds. If you are interested in participating in the content process, contact Allison Price (allison at openstack.org). The slide deck also contains summaries of a dozen use cases for reference (pp. 30-33). After the initial update, Thierry Carrez and I dove into an update on the OSF open infrastructure project expansion and governance discussion. We went through a quick summary of the history of this initiative, which we kicked off last year as part of the community wide strategic review. I posted an update a few weeks ago to this list on the state of those discussions[3], and the presentation covered much of the same ground with additional detail and discussion of a few points. The goal was to get general agreement on the high level framework so that we can move forward with drafting up the necessary documents to implement a more formal and permanent structure for considering additional projects, as well as a confirmation process for our existing pilot projects. We had some good discussion and will be moving forward with several next steps, including holding a community meeting in the next few weeks, beginning to draft some Bylaws updates (we’ll post those to this list), and scheduling an additional Board call for October. Next, Mark Collier talked about some updates to the sponsorship and funding options for the OSF as we include additional projects. One of our goals is to minimize overhead and duplication, provide additional value to existing members, and open up the possibility to provide ongoing funding to new projects that come on. Mark presented two phases for feedback and input. The first phase takes our existing OpenStack project corporate sponsorship model and opens it up to other projects we’re hosting. For Foundation corporate members (Gold and Platinum members) they would be able to show their support for any project without paying additional fees. This model is targeted at the ongoing project-specific funding and leaves room for additional start up funding that may be useful to help with initial launch expenses. Phase one received general consensus and we’ll be moving forward with that. The second phase proposes the possible creation of a Silver corporate membership tier that could be desirable for companies who want to support multiple OSF projects, but do not necessarily want to join at the Gold or Platinum level. One major different from Gold and Platinum membership is that it would not have specific member class representation on the Board like the Individual, Platinum and Gold classes. There was quite a bit of discussion around this corporate membership option and most people agreed we needed to discuss it more. We wrapped up the meeting with a brief overview of some brand research we have been doing with an outside firm to try to gain a better understanding of the perception of OpenStack in the marketplace, see how people viewed foundations and their role in the open source landscape and where we could best help, and see if the “open infrastructure” concept is resonating as we start to use it more. We will be doing a deeper dive into this research in a couple of weeks with our outside experts (we’ll probably post the invite to the marketing list if you’re interested in following along). It was a packed meeting with a lot of content, but I feel like we had some very good discussions. I also noticed we had strong observer attendance on the call, so thanks to everyone who took the time to dial in and follow along. Feel free to reach out to me with any questions or comments. Thanks, Jonathan 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/18Sep2018BoardMeeting 2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10UyCpxkjPqC3kT-dYRpBxzNT39i2OhlggJvzGDosMz0/ 3. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-August/002617.html From jonathan at openstack.org Fri Sep 21 14:56:10 2018 From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:56:10 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] September 18 Board of Directors Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I believe you’re referring to the map image in the slide deck? The OpenStack map is a something we created last year to help explain OpenStack services from a user viewpoint rather than a project-centric or team-centric view. The "core" services on the map are not tied to the old core nomenclature, and we are using the word in a more informal sense based on the feedback we've received from users about what they view as the basic building block services of their OpenStack clouds. This is not a governance document or encyclopedic project listing, but rather a high-level explainer graphic to show how the services relate to each other and to the common types of functionality that are available in clouds. Jonathan > On Sep 21, 2018, at 8:43 AM, Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com wrote: > > Jonathan, > What does that mean that Ironic is core project? > Not sure what process was used for it nor how we used old core nomenclature now. > > Thanks, > Arkady > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jonathan at openstack.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 5:24 PM > To: foundation at lists.openstack.org > Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] September 18 Board of Directors Meeting > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive information. > > > On September 18, the OpenStack Foundation Board of Directors met via conference call. The agenda was posted on the wiki[1]. > > Almost all of the content meeting followed from presentations in a deck that is attached to this email as a PDF or available on Google Slides[2]. > > The meeting started out with an update from Lauren Sell on the state of the OpenStack market, including some recent data from analysts, as well as some data from the latest user survey that we are in the process of putting together. She also highlighted some new public user stories and case studies and provided some details about the state of the OpenStack public cloud global footprint. She then presented about the latest OpenStack software release, Rocky, some quick updates on the 4 OSF pilot projects, and a preview of the upcoming OpenStack “Open Infrastructure” Summit in Berlin. Finally she covered some activities underway right now, including opening an office in Shanghai, China and hiring our first full-time Chinese staff member, updates to the OpenStack website, and some content production that is being done in the community around HA and hybrid clouds. If you are interested in participating in the content process, contact Allison Price (allison at openstack.org). The slide deck also contains summaries of a dozen use cases for reference (pp. 30-33). > > After the initial update, Thierry Carrez and I dove into an update on the OSF open infrastructure project expansion and governance discussion. We went through a quick summary of the history of this initiative, which we kicked off last year as part of the community wide strategic review. I posted an update a few weeks ago to this list on the state of those discussions[3], and the presentation covered much of the same ground with additional detail and discussion of a few points. The goal was to get general agreement on the high level framework so that we can move forward with drafting up the necessary documents to implement a more formal and permanent structure for considering additional projects, as well as a confirmation process for our existing pilot projects. We had some good discussion and will be moving forward with several next steps, including holding a community meeting in the next few weeks, beginning to draft some Bylaws updates (we’ll post those to this list), and scheduling an additional Board call for October. > > Next, Mark Collier talked about some updates to the sponsorship and funding options for the OSF as we include additional projects. One of our goals is to minimize overhead and duplication, provide additional value to existing members, and open up the possibility to provide ongoing funding to new projects that come on. Mark presented two phases for feedback and input. > > The first phase takes our existing OpenStack project corporate sponsorship model and opens it up to other projects we’re hosting. For Foundation corporate members (Gold and Platinum members) they would be able to show their support for any project without paying additional fees. This model is targeted at the ongoing project-specific funding and leaves room for additional start up funding that may be useful to help with initial launch expenses. Phase one received general consensus and we’ll be moving forward with that. > > The second phase proposes the possible creation of a Silver corporate membership tier that could be desirable for companies who want to support multiple OSF projects, but do not necessarily want to join at the Gold or Platinum level. One major different from Gold and Platinum membership is that it would not have specific member class representation on the Board like the Individual, Platinum and Gold classes. There was quite a bit of discussion around this corporate membership option and most people agreed we needed to discuss it more. > > We wrapped up the meeting with a brief overview of some brand research we have been doing with an outside firm to try to gain a better understanding of the perception of OpenStack in the marketplace, see how people viewed foundations and their role in the open source landscape and where we could best help, and see if the “open infrastructure” concept is resonating as we start to use it more. We will be doing a deeper dive into this research in a couple of weeks with our outside experts (we’ll probably post the invite to the marketing list if you’re interested in following along). > > It was a packed meeting with a lot of content, but I feel like we had some very good discussions. I also noticed we had strong observer attendance on the call, so thanks to everyone who took the time to dial in and follow along. Feel free to reach out to me with any questions or comments. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > > 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/18Sep2018BoardMeeting > 2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10UyCpxkjPqC3kT-dYRpBxzNT39i2OhlggJvzGDosMz0/ > 3. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-August/002617.html > From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Fri Sep 21 16:00:27 2018 From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:00:27 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] September 18 Board of Directors Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <66aeef1249294db5b1a11ca470fc441d@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> It is the map in slidedeck for project Navigator that I referred to. Concern that we are re-using "core" nomenclature that had a well-defined meaning before. -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jonathan at openstack.org] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 9:56 AM To: Kanevsky, Arkady Cc: foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] September 18 Board of Directors Meeting [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive information. I believe you’re referring to the map image in the slide deck? The OpenStack map is a something we created last year to help explain OpenStack services from a user viewpoint rather than a project-centric or team-centric view. The "core" services on the map are not tied to the old core nomenclature, and we are using the word in a more informal sense based on the feedback we've received from users about what they view as the basic building block services of their OpenStack clouds. This is not a governance document or encyclopedic project listing, but rather a high-level explainer graphic to show how the services relate to each other and to the common types of functionality that are available in clouds. Jonathan > On Sep 21, 2018, at 8:43 AM, Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com wrote: > > Jonathan, > What does that mean that Ironic is core project? > Not sure what process was used for it nor how we used old core nomenclature now. > > Thanks, > Arkady > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jonathan at openstack.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 5:24 PM > To: foundation at lists.openstack.org > Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] September 18 Board of Directors Meeting > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive information. > > > On September 18, the OpenStack Foundation Board of Directors met via conference call. The agenda was posted on the wiki[1]. > > Almost all of the content meeting followed from presentations in a deck that is attached to this email as a PDF or available on Google Slides[2]. > > The meeting started out with an update from Lauren Sell on the state of the OpenStack market, including some recent data from analysts, as well as some data from the latest user survey that we are in the process of putting together. She also highlighted some new public user stories and case studies and provided some details about the state of the OpenStack public cloud global footprint. She then presented about the latest OpenStack software release, Rocky, some quick updates on the 4 OSF pilot projects, and a preview of the upcoming OpenStack “Open Infrastructure” Summit in Berlin. Finally she covered some activities underway right now, including opening an office in Shanghai, China and hiring our first full-time Chinese staff member, updates to the OpenStack website, and some content production that is being done in the community around HA and hybrid clouds. If you are interested in participating in the content process, contact Allison Price (allison at openstack.org). The slide deck also contains summaries of a dozen use cases for reference (pp. 30-33). > > After the initial update, Thierry Carrez and I dove into an update on the OSF open infrastructure project expansion and governance discussion. We went through a quick summary of the history of this initiative, which we kicked off last year as part of the community wide strategic review. I posted an update a few weeks ago to this list on the state of those discussions[3], and the presentation covered much of the same ground with additional detail and discussion of a few points. The goal was to get general agreement on the high level framework so that we can move forward with drafting up the necessary documents to implement a more formal and permanent structure for considering additional projects, as well as a confirmation process for our existing pilot projects. We had some good discussion and will be moving forward with several next steps, including holding a community meeting in the next few weeks, beginning to draft some Bylaws updates (we’ll post those to this list), and scheduling an additional Board call for October. > > Next, Mark Collier talked about some updates to the sponsorship and funding options for the OSF as we include additional projects. One of our goals is to minimize overhead and duplication, provide additional value to existing members, and open up the possibility to provide ongoing funding to new projects that come on. Mark presented two phases for feedback and input. > > The first phase takes our existing OpenStack project corporate sponsorship model and opens it up to other projects we’re hosting. For Foundation corporate members (Gold and Platinum members) they would be able to show their support for any project without paying additional fees. This model is targeted at the ongoing project-specific funding and leaves room for additional start up funding that may be useful to help with initial launch expenses. Phase one received general consensus and we’ll be moving forward with that. > > The second phase proposes the possible creation of a Silver corporate membership tier that could be desirable for companies who want to support multiple OSF projects, but do not necessarily want to join at the Gold or Platinum level. One major different from Gold and Platinum membership is that it would not have specific member class representation on the Board like the Individual, Platinum and Gold classes. There was quite a bit of discussion around this corporate membership option and most people agreed we needed to discuss it more. > > We wrapped up the meeting with a brief overview of some brand research we have been doing with an outside firm to try to gain a better understanding of the perception of OpenStack in the marketplace, see how people viewed foundations and their role in the open source landscape and where we could best help, and see if the “open infrastructure” concept is resonating as we start to use it more. We will be doing a deeper dive into this research in a couple of weeks with our outside experts (we’ll probably post the invite to the marketing list if you’re interested in following along). > > It was a packed meeting with a lot of content, but I feel like we had some very good discussions. I also noticed we had strong observer attendance on the call, so thanks to everyone who took the time to dial in and follow along. Feel free to reach out to me with any questions or comments. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > > 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/18Sep2018BoardMeeting > 2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10UyCpxkjPqC3kT-dYRpBxzNT39i2OhlggJvzGDosMz0/ > 3. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-August/002617.html > From amy at demarco.com Fri Sep 21 20:40:26 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:40:26 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] Meeting Reminder for September, 24, 19:00 UTC Message-ID: This is a reminder we will be meeting on Monday, September 24, at 19:00 UTC in the #openstack-diversity channel. The main topics for the meeting will be the merger of the Women of OpenStack under the Diversity and Inclusion WG, Summit and a survey update. Hope to see everyone there! Thanks, Amy (spotz) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From messenger at webex.com Fri Sep 28 22:44:41 2018 From: messenger at webex.com (messenger at webex.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:44:41 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Invitation to OpenStack Board Meeting, October 25, 7am-9am pacific Message-ID: <229703665.406851538174681254.JavaMail.nobody@rsj13rmd002.webex.com> Hello Foundation Mailing List, The OpenStack Board invites you to participate as an attendee in the following OpenStack board meeting. We will be using WebEx to facilitate the meeting and audio conferencing. Please join the WebEx session then follow the instructions to either join the telephone conference service or to join via VOIP. Topic: OpenStack Board Meeting, October 25, 7am-9am pacific Host: Alan Clark Date: Thursday, October 25, 2018 Time: 7:00 am, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco, GMT-07:00) Session number: 925 683 429 Session password: This session does not require a password. Agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation ------------------------------------------------------- To join the session ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=t8c39af405243e813e98c15a011ac5007 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the session password: This session does not require a password. 4. Click "Join Now". 5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen. To add this session to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=t431749708801fefdebfc9fbeb433dc0d To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/k2/j.php?MTID=tfe95590edb3981f6a174818d42849011 ------------------------------------------------------- To join the session by phone only ------------------------------------------------------- To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the training session, or call the number below and enter the access code. Call-in toll number (US/Canada):1-650-479-3207 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada):1-855-244-8681 Having trouble dialing in? Try these backup numbers: Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada):1-855-244-8681 Call-in toll number (US/Canada):1-650-479-3207 Global call-in numbers: https://openstack.webex.com/openstack/globalcallin.php?serviceType=TC&ED=724201327&tollFree=1 Show toll-free dialing restrictions: https://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf Access code: 925 683 429 ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- You can contact Alan Clark at: aclark at suse.com https://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This Webex service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your concerns with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do not join the session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject to discovery in the event of litigation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: