Open Stack

If we want to avoid being all things to all people, then we have to remove
the word "ubiquitous", for purely definitional reasons if nothing else. If
we want to have ubiquitous in the statement then we'd better have an answer
to the question about being all things etc.

This seems to be a fairly fundamental question to me, much more so than
whether we mention specific capabilities, users or operators.
​​
​​
Roland
​

On 12 February 2016 at 10:04, Boris Renski <brenski at mirantis.com> wrote:

> Does anybody share a concern that the current mission statement is a bit
> too generic and broad?
>
> Once this mission statement is published, I can see headlines "OpenStack
> will fail because it aims to be all things to all people. Updated mission
> statement confirms it's inevitable doom."
>
> Can we explore options to tighten it up?
>
> -Boris
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:37 PM, AlanClark <aclark at suse.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>> ​​
>>>> ​​
>>>> To produce a ubiquitous Open Source Cloud Computing platform. It should
>>>> be easy to use, simple to implement, work well at all scales, be
>>>> interoperable between instances, and meet the needs of users
>>>> and operators of both public and private clouds.
>>>>
>>> This final version sounds fantastic to me.  What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foundation mailing list
>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20160212/d8eceab6/attachment.html>