[OpenStack Foundation] Updating the OpenStack Mission Statement

Edgar Magana edgar.magana at workday.com
Mon Feb 8 15:29:40 UTC 2016






On 2/7/16, 9:25 AM, "Tim Bell" <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:

>
>Completely agree… we should have operators and users in mind as part of the mission.
>
>The operator side of things is now well underway (and moving well with good foundation staff assistance). 
>
>A board/user committee F2F topic for the future could be how to address the ‘user’ experience. While the API working group is one part, building the user/partner ecosystem is vital.
>
>
>Can we envisage an OpenStack re:Invent about using OpenStack (and nothing else) ?
>
>Tim

+2 Thanks for supporting the operators side Tim!

>
>On 07/02/16 15:04, "Monty Taylor" <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:
>
>>On 02/06/2016 01:27 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>It is for that reason that I believe that underscoring the importance of 
>>both classes of 'user' in our mission is essential. Both classes are 
>>essential to our effort, but it's easy to fall into the trap of only 
>>considering one or the other.
>>


More information about the Foundation mailing list