[OpenStack Foundation] Updating the OpenStack Mission Statement

Tim Bell Tim.Bell at cern.ch
Sun Feb 7 17:25:54 UTC 2016

Completely agree… we should have operators and users in mind as part of the mission.

The operator side of things is now well underway (and moving well with good foundation staff assistance). 

A board/user committee F2F topic for the future could be how to address the ‘user’ experience. While the API working group is one part, building the user/partner ecosystem is vital.

Can we envisage an OpenStack re:Invent about using OpenStack (and nothing else) ?


On 07/02/16 15:04, "Monty Taylor" <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:

>On 02/06/2016 01:27 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>It is for that reason that I believe that underscoring the importance of 
>both classes of 'user' in our mission is essential. Both classes are 
>essential to our effort, but it's easy to fall into the trap of only 
>considering one or the other.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2792 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20160207/d0990cc4/attachment.bin>

More information about the Foundation mailing list