Open Stack

It's hard to measure progress without data.

Tristan @ Aptira from mobile.



    _____________________________
From: Rob Hirschfeld <rob at zehicle.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 09:30
Subject: Re: [Foundation Board] [OpenStack Foundation] April 2 OpenStack Board meeting call for agenda items; Board packet materials due by Monday March 30th.
To:  <foundation-board at lists.openstack.org>


On 03/28/2015 03:43 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:> I would hope that it's no surprise that I am a huge advocate of open > and transparent dealings, so in general, I am a favor of both > collecting feedback and publishing all of the things we can publish. > However, that sounds like an accusation of misconduct in the guise of > suggesting a process or policy be adopted. I can tell you from > experience that the answer to such issues is not to invent process or > policy, but rather to confront them in an open and honest manner.+1 on being open, transparent and timely in dealing with issues.  In my experience, we will not get actionable information from 1...10 scale questions on a semi-annual survey that's already very long.If we really want feedback then JUST ASK THE LIST(S) FOR IT.  That would mean phrasing Board reports and agenda in a way that invites commentary and discussion.  Or potentially, starting a thread about it.  I'll show this with an example...._______________________________________________Foundation-board mailing listFoundation-board at lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20150328/79bbf18a/attachment.html>