It doesn't eliminate it. It just makes it ineffective. -- Jim Jagielski Brief? Mobile > On Oct 9, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > > > It is not clear to me that SVT or Condorcet would eliminate ballot stuffing. > > Tim > > From: Ryan Lane [mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org] > Sent: 09 October 2013 23:06 > To: Boris Renski > Cc: foundation at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Member Director Elections > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Boris Renski <brenski at mirantis.com> wrote: > I agree with Thierry and have mentioned this during the last board meeting. I don't think there is anything fundamentally wrong with the election process itself. We should just focus on pruning inactive foundation members and creating a sensible, minimal barrier to voter eligibility. > > Is there anyone who does not agree with this? > > > Aren't many people in this thread saying there is indeed something wrong with the election method being used? It allows easy ballot stuffing. > > - Ryan > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20131009/b465ebcf/attachment-0001.html>