[OpenStack Foundation] Individual Member Director Elections

Jim Jagielski jimjag at gmail.com
Wed Oct 9 22:33:24 UTC 2013

It doesn't eliminate it. It just makes it ineffective. 

Jim Jagielski
Brief? Mobile

> On Oct 9, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
> It is not clear to me that SVT or Condorcet would eliminate ballot stuffing.
> Tim
> From: Ryan Lane [mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org] 
> Sent: 09 October 2013 23:06
> To: Boris Renski
> Cc: foundation at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Member Director Elections
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Boris Renski <brenski at mirantis.com> wrote:
> I agree with Thierry and have mentioned this during the last board meeting. I don't think there is anything fundamentally wrong with the election process itself. We should just focus on pruning inactive foundation members and creating a sensible, minimal barrier to voter eligibility. 
> Is there anyone who does not agree with this? 
> Aren't many people in this thread saying there is indeed something wrong with the election method being used? It allows easy ballot stuffing.
> - Ryan
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20131009/b465ebcf/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Foundation mailing list