Thanks Tim, it's not clear to me either. Sent from phone. On 10 Oct 2013, at 8:13 am, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: It is not clear to me that SVT or Condorcet would eliminate ballot stuffing. Tim *From:* Ryan Lane [mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org <rlane at wikimedia.org>] *Sent:* 09 October 2013 23:06 *To:* Boris Renski *Cc:* foundation at lists.openstack.org *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Member Director Elections On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Boris Renski <brenski at mirantis.com> wrote: I agree with Thierry and have mentioned this during the last board meeting. I don't think there is anything fundamentally wrong with the election process itself. We should just focus on pruning inactive foundation members and creating a sensible, minimal barrier to voter eligibility. Is there anyone who does not agree with this? Aren't many people in this thread saying there is indeed something wrong with the election method being used? It allows easy ballot stuffing. - Ryan _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20131010/9e1b588c/attachment.html>