[OpenStack Foundation] Individual Member Director Elections

Tristan Goode tristan at aptira.com
Wed Oct 9 21:25:15 UTC 2013

Thanks Tim, it's not clear to me either.

Sent from phone.

On 10 Oct 2013, at 8:13 am, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:

It is not clear to me that SVT or Condorcet would eliminate ballot stuffing.


*From:* Ryan Lane [mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org <rlane at wikimedia.org>]
*Sent:* 09 October 2013 23:06
*To:* Boris Renski
*Cc:* foundation at lists.openstack.org
*Subject:* Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Member Director Elections

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Boris Renski <brenski at mirantis.com> wrote:

 I agree with Thierry and have mentioned this during the last board
meeting. I don't think there is anything fundamentally wrong with the
election process itself. We should just focus on pruning inactive
foundation members and creating a sensible, minimal barrier to voter

Is there anyone who does not agree with this?

Aren't many people in this thread saying there is indeed something wrong
with the election method being used? It allows easy ballot stuffing.

- Ryan

Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20131010/9e1b588c/attachment.html>

More information about the Foundation mailing list