On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>wrote: > >> In that respect, we have established a healthy culture on the board but >> it's really only obvious if you sit in on the board meetings. I can >> totally relate to being sceptical about that. >> >> Honestly, if the board was actually filled with the kind of corporate >> bickering many of us feared, it would be a lot easier to feel we would >> have the necessary support to make this change. > > > I would argue that this is EXACTLY the right time to consider such a > change if it is in fact warranted (I believe it is). This is when this > sort of change is not a reaction to a (possibly only perceived) ailing > board culture. I am more likely to trust the board to make a sound > reccomdation/decision/election proposal when it is healthy. I hope I am > not alone in that assessment. > +1 Doug > > dt > > -- > > Dean Troyer > dtroyer at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20131008/b59cd182/attachment.html>