[OpenStack Foundation] Transparency, was "Individual Member Director Elections"

Jim Jagielski jimjag at gmail.com
Tue Oct 8 01:14:39 UTC 2013

Just how many people are on the board? Either stuff is a priority or it isn't. And when resources are limited is when one sees what really are priorities. 

Jim Jagielski
Brief? Mobile

> On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:27 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Troy Toman <troy at tomanator.com> wrote:
>> We all whiffed on this one. In the effort to get something done before the window closed, I think we were completely blind to the transparency obligation. Huge lesson for me here as I have always advocated for more transparency from this board. There is no excuse but it turns out to be harder to remember than I expected. Hopefully, we will an infrastructure in place soon that makes this the default for all board interactions.
> Other boards with which I have been involved had an appointed position (not necessarily a board member) to handle the communications. For example, I served as Communications Directory for the Python Software Foundation for two years. Perhaps we should consider creating a similar position.
> Doug
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20131007/d519ad1f/attachment.html>

More information about the Foundation mailing list