Open Stack

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Alan Clark <aclark at suse.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>> On 9/17/2012 at 11:35 AM, Lloyd Dewolf <lloyd at pistoncloud.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alan Clark <aclark at suse.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> On 8/31/2012 at 06:56 AM, <Rob_Hirschfeld at Dell.com> wrote:
>>>> For minutes, should we be approving them as part of our process before they
>>>> are officially posted?
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to add overhead but that helps ensure the board as a whole can
>>>> vouch for them.
>>>
>>> Yes.  They need to be approved by the board members before being posted.
>>
>> Hi Alan and Jonathan,
>>
>>
>> What's the status on published meeting minutes? Unless I missed the
>> update or the minutes being published it's now been two weeks since
>> the last update. I can appreciate that this first publishing might
>> still be being negotiated, but I think the Foundation membership would
>> appreciate an update.
>
> Hi Lloyd,
>
> Thanks for being interested in the board's efforts.
> As the minutes are an official record it is important that they be reviewed and approved by the board before being posted.  It's not a timely process, but is necessary to help ensure that the board actions are reflected accurately in the official record.  And yes, we will definitely get more proficient going forward.


Hi Alan,

Thanks for the response. I've received a handful of thanks from
outside my org for asking the question again including from two people
I haven't previously had an opportunity to collaborate with. These
people like me desire more communication.

What is the ETA? Why is this process opaque? What are the blocking
issues? How can I or other members of the Foundation help?

The disconnect to me is as of today two additional Board meetings will
have taken place. It would seem prudent that the Foundation have a
clear record of previous meetings before the board holds each meeting.

Thank you,
--
@lloyddewolf
http://www.pistoncloud.com/