Open Stack

Going to try to graph some of this, but adding to the discussion a run of

https://gist.github.com/3403165

output as of this morning:

[(1103, u'hp'),
 (1040, u'none'),
 (1034, u'dell'),
 (1033, u'rackspace'),
 (104, u'mirantis'),
 (104, u'did not provide'),
 (76, u'cisco'),
 (74, u'ibm'),
 (65, u'emc'),
 (57, u'suse'),
 (42, u'canonical'),
 (33, u'red hat'),
 (32, u'nebula'),
 (30, u'dreamhost'),
 (27, u'intel'),
 (25, u'cloudscaling'),
 (22, u'morphlabs'),
 (21, u'vmware'),
 (17, u'comcast'),
 (15, u'sina')]


-Matt

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 08:37 -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
>> Before the election, the issue of influence of corporate entities in
>> the individual member election was raised.  As a result, the election
>> inspectors agreed it would be beneficial to analyze the election
>> results to help quantify the role employers played in the election.
>
> James and co - that's an excellent piece of work, really fascinating.
> Well done.
>
> This kind of transparency is really great to see - I'm sure we'll all
> judge these stats differently and draw different conclusions on what
> this means for the future, but at least we're making those judgements
> based on real data.
>
> Thanks again,
> Mark.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation