[OpenStack Foundation] OpenStack Foundation Bylaws first draft published

Dave Neary dave at neary-consulting.com
Fri May 11 22:08:22 UTC 2012


Hi Stefano,

Apache V2 is a license which is sufficiently lax that it will likely be compatible with it, and contributions accepted under it can be relicensed without requiring a copyright assignment or similar.

Regards,
Dave.

"Stefano Maffulli" <stefano at openstack.org> wrote:

>Since it was mentioned on the other list:
>
>> Article VIII, Section 1.
>> The Project shall not accept contributions of software code unless
>> such contribution is made on the terms of the Apache 2.0 license
>
>What happens if Apache Software License 2.0 is obsoleted, by court
>order
>or upgraded by ASF?
>
>Does it make sense to leave in the bylaws the generic principle for the
>license of choice and leave to the board the honor to define the actual
>license based on the best available possibility at the time?
>
>/stef
>_______________________________________________
>Foundation mailing list
>Foundation at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



More information about the Foundation mailing list