[OpenStack Foundation] Nomination Process Updates

Mark Collier mark at openstack.org
Thu Aug 16 07:13:32 UTC 2012


Will try to post more info tomorrow, but the short answer is that something in the page template broke when we hit 4000 members (!) and switching to a paginated design fixed the issue. 



On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Seems to be a blank page, presently. 
> 
> I ran the numbers yesterday and they were as follows:
> 
> [(864, u'rackspace'),
>  (828, u'hp'),
>  (513, u'none'),
>  (279, u'dell'),
>  (57, u'emc'),
>  (52, u'cisco'),
>  (36, u'ibm'),
>  (32, u'canonical'),
>  (27, u'dreamhost'),
>  (26, u'nebula'),
>  (25, u'red hat'),
>  (20, u'employee'),
>  (20, u'cloudscaling'),
>  (16, u'mirantis'),
>  (13, u'piston cloud'),
>  (13, u'morphlabs'),
>  (11, u'suse'),
>  (7, u'netapp'),
>  (6, u'yahoo'),
>  (6, u'at&t')]
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> IBM Distinguished Engineer, CTO Industry and Cloud Standards
> Member, IBM Academy of Technology
> IBM Software Group, Standards Strategy
> email: chrisfer at us.ibm.com
> Twitter: christo4ferris
> phone: +1 508 234 2986
> 
> -----Andrew Clay Shafer <acs at parvuscaptus.com> wrote: -----
> To: Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org>
> From: Andrew Clay Shafer <acs at parvuscaptus.com>
> Date: 08/15/2012 09:05PM
> Cc: foundation at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Nomination Process Updates
> 
> 
> I was interested to see how things have changed in the last 2 weeks.
> 
> Did the list of members get taken down or it just isn't working right now?
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org> wrote:
>> In the spirit of running-the-code-so-the-rest-of-us-get-more-context,
>> here's the resulting output when run at 2:10 CST today 8/1/12.
>> 
>> [(787, u'rackspace'),
>>  (753, u'hp'),
>>  (297, u'none'),
>>  (41, u'cisco'),
>>  (28, u'canonical'),
>>  (24, u'dreamhost'),
>>  (22, u'red hat'),
>>  (22, u'nebula'),
>>  (17, u'cloudscaling'),
>>  (14, u'employee'),
>>  (13, u'morphlabs'),
>>  (13, u'emc'),
>>  (13, u'dell'),
>>  (10, u'suse'),
>>  (10, u'piston cloud'),
>>  (5, u'yahoo'),
>>  (5, u'ibm'),
>>  (5, u'at&t'),
>>  (4, u'tipit'),
>>  (4, u'opscode')]
>> 
>> Wanted to be sure non-Python programmers have the information that
>> results from running the script linked on Github.
>> 
>> Thanks Jonathan and crew for all the additional info, now I know who
>> to thank for the support.
>> Anne
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Matt Joyce <matt at nycresistor.com> wrote:
>> >> For those who are curious, I've pushed up an ugly hack to get some
>> >> basic stats one membership affiliations here:
>> >>   https://gist.github.com/3229457
>> >
>> > =/  not particularly happy with those numbers.  it's about as fair and
>> > balanced as fox news.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Foundation mailing list
>> > Foundation at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foundation mailing list
>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20120816/05c86e9f/attachment.html>


More information about the Foundation mailing list