Open Stack

Are the numbers even that bad?  After a bit of tweaking on that script I make it currently:

31.56% Rackspace
30.25% HP
25.24% Affiliated other
12.95% Non-affiliated

Is that too "Fox News" for people?  I don't think so.

Ewan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne Gentle [mailto:anne at openstack.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 12:22 PM
> To: Matt Joyce
> Cc: foundation at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Nomination Process Updates
> 
> In the spirit of running-the-code-so-the-rest-of-us-get-more-context,
> here's the resulting output when run at 2:10 CST today 8/1/12.
> 
> [(787, u'rackspace'),
>  (753, u'hp'),
>  (297, u'none'),
>  (41, u'cisco'),
>  (28, u'canonical'),
>  (24, u'dreamhost'),
>  (22, u'red hat'),
>  (22, u'nebula'),
>  (17, u'cloudscaling'),
>  (14, u'employee'),
>  (13, u'morphlabs'),
>  (13, u'emc'),
>  (13, u'dell'),
>  (10, u'suse'),
>  (10, u'piston cloud'),
>  (5, u'yahoo'),
>  (5, u'ibm'),
>  (5, u'at&t'),
>  (4, u'tipit'),
>  (4, u'opscode')]
> 
> Wanted to be sure non-Python programmers have the information that
> results from running the script linked on Github.
> 
> Thanks Jonathan and crew for all the additional info, now I know who
> to thank for the support.
> Anne
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Matt Joyce <matt at nycresistor.com>
> wrote:
> >> For those who are curious, I've pushed up an ugly hack to get some
> >> basic stats one membership affiliations here:
> >>   https://gist.github.com/3229457
> >
> > =/  not particularly happy with those numbers.  it's about as fair
> and
> > balanced as fox news.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foundation mailing list
> > Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation