From ushnishtha at hotmail.com Sun Nov 3 02:38:49 2019 From: ushnishtha at hotmail.com (Egle Sigler) Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 02:38:49 +0000 Subject: [Foundation Board] Interop Board Report Message-ID: Hello Everyone, I am attaching a pdf of the board report since google doesn't work in China. For those not in China, it is available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E8DwY-BGQdcy-u7jQOeGsWUh06yXNGNyk_yZvTTtXbo/edit?usp=sharing Thank you, Egle -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Interop WG Board Report November 2019, Shanghai.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 109793 bytes Desc: Interop WG Board Report November 2019, Shanghai.pdf URL: From alanclark at openstack.org Mon Nov 25 16:39:04 2019 From: alanclark at openstack.org (Alan Clark) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:39:04 -0700 Subject: [Foundation Board] OpenStack Board Call, December 10, 2019, 7am pacific Message-ID: <014401d5a3ae$da0deb80$8e29c280$@openstack.org> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 5248 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sean.mcginnis at gmail.com Tue Nov 26 14:14:29 2019 From: sean.mcginnis at gmail.com (Sean McGinnis) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:14:29 -0600 Subject: [Foundation Board] [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: > > Hey All, > > I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is > a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in > a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it > was created to facilitate. [1] > > A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a > community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and > uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. > > What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on > behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use > its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? > > - Graham > > > 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ > I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add their names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to the list of organizations. Sean From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Tue Nov 26 18:13:43 2019 From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:13:43 +0000 Subject: [Foundation Board] [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org> References: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org> Message-ID: <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> Sounds good -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Carrez Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:01 AM To: Graham Hayes; foundation-board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Graham Hayes wrote: > I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is > a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, > in a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that > it was created to facilitate. [1] > > A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a > community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and uses a > .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. > > What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on > behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use > its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? It probably makes more sense (and has more weight) at the Foundation-level. -- Thierry Carrez _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From mark.radcliffe at dlapiper.com Tue Nov 26 18:58:14 2019 From: mark.radcliffe at dlapiper.com (Radcliffe, Mark) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:58:14 +0000 Subject: [Foundation Board] [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> References: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org> <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> Message-ID: I am enclosing the statement by the Apache Software Foundation: https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the-apache-software-foundation-objects. -----Original Message----- From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 10:14 AM To: thierry at openstack.org; gr at ham.ie; foundation-board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Foundation Board] [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign [EXTERNAL] Sounds good -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Carrez Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:01 AM To: Graham Hayes; foundation-board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Graham Hayes wrote: > I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is > a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, > in a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that > it was created to facilitate. [1] > > A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a > community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and uses a > .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. > > What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on > behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use > its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? It probably makes more sense (and has more weight) at the Foundation-level. -- Thierry Carrez _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation _______________________________________________ Foundation-board mailing list Foundation-board at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to postmaster at dlapiper.com. Thank you. From rv6848 at att.com Tue Nov 26 22:20:12 2019 From: rv6848 at att.com (VAN WYK, RYAN L) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:20:12 +0000 Subject: [Foundation Board] [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> References: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org>, <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> Message-ID: <9E1D3E71-47DB-4E82-9D7E-5EAFAAFD846D@att.com> Agree Ryan van Wyk VP – Network Cloud AT&T 1010 Pine St., 18th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63101 m 312.860.0966 | rv6848 at att.com MOBILIZING YOUR WORLD On Nov 26, 2019, at 1:14 PM, "Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com" wrote: Sounds good -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Carrez Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:01 AM To: Graham Hayes; foundation-board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Graham Hayes wrote: I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it was created to facilitate. [1] A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? It probably makes more sense (and has more weight) at the Foundation-level. -- Thierry Carrez _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=-D-CQxfZGanK68LdN-oWCaJXiTIKLszl2xUfL-mitiw&s=6mTtX_-h5RGZQPlYpynQP6VcRDkgY8ro-ahRlZsQtP4&e= _______________________________________________ Foundation-board mailing list Foundation-board at lists.openstack.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation-2Dboard&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=-D-CQxfZGanK68LdN-oWCaJXiTIKLszl2xUfL-mitiw&s=TNbHw6ik-P6rNVmG3GKHta7XHO0HdatGLdoRtjoaBZM&e= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: