On 08/27/2015 02:30 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Yes, as the voting is somewhat easy to game and totals are meant to > be purely advisory in nature, it's even possible that some track > chairs may disregard them entirely (especially if they're running > counter to common logic). Yes, I totally understand. I am just hoping to get a look at the anonymized data set. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20150827/3838c99d/attachment-0001.pgp>