[openstack-community] [OpenStack Marketing] qyjohn's quarterly report of the size and health of the 4 open source projects is out

Yujie Du duyujie.dyj at gmail.com
Thu Jul 4 11:29:10 UTC 2013


Here is the English report from my friend Qingye:
http://www.qyjohn.net/?p=3321
And I will give him the feedback.


2013/7/4 Stefano Maffulli <stefano at openstack.org>

> On 07/04/2013 11:03 AM, Gordon, Joe wrote:
> > The git commit numbers look way off, for the reasons you mentioned
> > below.
> >
> > These numbers are more accurate (at least with regard to OpenStack -
> > AFAIK they mine teh data from github.com/openstack) :
> [...]
>
> I think this is a better link, listing Apache CloudStack:
>
>
> http://www.ohloh.net/p/compare?project_0=OpenStack&project_1=Eucalyptus&project_2=Apache+CloudStack
>
> > From: Atwood, Mark Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 11:47 AM To:
> [...]
> > The data sources for discussion thread metrics for OpenStack are
> > https://lists.openstack.net/openstack/
> > https://answers.launchpad.net/openstack/
> > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/*/ https://ask.openstack.org/
> >
> > Is he missing any public discussion forums about OpenStack of import
> > that we should bring to his attention?
>
> I think he's missing a lot of discussions that don't happen on
> openstack.org. domains, like the discussions on meetup.com, google
> groups, G+, Facebook group, etc. Some of these stats we don't track
> either (yet), but we're pushing forward an effort to consolidate these
> sources and give users a better/easiest way to find peers. For example,
> we now host mailing lists in non-english languages on
> lists.openstack.org (at the moment Vietnamese, Italian and Spanish) and
> we're starting a project for a user group portal that will aggregate
> things from meetup.com.
>
> > His also mines the git repos for quantum, keystone, glance, horizon,
> > swift, cinder, and nova.  This misses the contributions by incubation
> > projects, preincubation projects, the infrastructure projects, and
> > client projects.
>
> That's the least solid part of his report. Ohloh does a better job, even
> if the way OpenStack uses git and github makes numbers less comparable
> across projects. The lack of source code for the git analysis on ohloh
> and john's report makes both of them less of a 'reliable source' for
> quote to me.
>
> /stef
> --
> Ask and answer questions on https://ask.openstack.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/marketing
>



-- 
--Ben

Trystack.cn   By Stacker, for Stacker!

Blog: duyujie.org
WEIBO: http://weibo.com/u/1716287123<http://www.weibo.com/u/1716287123?from=profile&wvr=4&loc=infweihao>
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/ben_Duyujie
LINKEDIN: cn.linkedin.com/in/duyujie
About me: http://about.me/Yujie.Du
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20130704/ea9b4dee/attachment.html>


More information about the Community mailing list