That's the plan :) -Kendall (diablo_rojo) On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:39 PM Kanevsky, Arkady <Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com> wrote:
Dell Customer Communication - Confidential
Kendall,
As I suggested, lets redirect old openstack channels to corresponding openinfra ones.
Thanks,
Arkady
*From:* Kendall Nelson <kennelson11@gmail.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2021 2:45 PM *To:* Wes Wilson *Cc:* Amy Marrich; Jeremy Stanley; foundation@lists.openstack.org *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [all] IRC Channel Renames
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Hello Everyone!
Quick update: It sounds like we have managed to negotiate control of the #openinfra group on freenode and can begin the migration! (Correct me if I'm wrong, fungi :) ).
So! This is the plan:
- #openstack-ptg -> #openinfra-ptg
- #openstack-forum -> #openinfra-forum
- #openstack-diversity -> #openinfra-diversity
- #openstack-board -> #openinfra-board (this one has already begun)
- #openstack-foundation -> #openinfra
- #openinfra-summit -> #openinfra-summit
If there are any others you have seen that could also require updating, please let us know! I will be coordinating with fungi to do the migrations this week and will work on updating any documentation after the migrations take place.
-Kendall (diablo_rojo)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:21 AM Wes Wilson <wes@openstack.org> wrote:
One logistical item to point out. We have been advised to minimize our use of “OIF” to reduce confusion with another organization that has a trademark on “OIF”. While we won’t be able to prevent everyone from using the acronym to reference the foundation, much like OSF was used, we have been advised to not use it in “attention getting” places.
We have started to replace the acronym with “OpenInfra Foundation” and “OpenInfra” depending on the use case. Another option to consider that we’re using for twitter handle, url, and similar spots is “OpenInfraDev”.
Thanks,
Wes
On Dec 15, 2020, at 10:50 AM, Amy Marrich <amy@demarco.com> wrote:
Kendall and Jeremy,
I'm good with the suggested name changes especially with that added information the openinfra isn't available. We should definitely keep it short so don't feel going to openinfratructure is a good alternative even if it is more obvious. I do think the more we use OIF vs OSF it'll be more natural for people to look for it.
Thanks,
Amy (spotz)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:34 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> wrote:
On 2020-12-15 12:20:58 -0600 (-0600), Ryan Beisner wrote:
My $0.02 over lunch: I think #openinfra-* would be a fitting move with the same number of digits and a recognizable moniker. [...]
The blocker there is that we can't control the #openinfra-* namespace on Freenode because the #openinfra channel is already taken by the separate https://opensourceinfra.org/ community. -- Jeremy Stanley _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
_______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation