On 05/11/2015 11:40 AM, Alan Clark wrote:
A question to clarify the wording within the Guidelines Approval; "D3. Designated sections only enforced for projects with required capabilities ". Does that infer that there may be Designated Sections listed as required but not enforced? Are there any within 2015.05 Guidelines? Alan,
Good question. The intent was that projects could define designated sections in advance of having required capabilities. So, I think your wording is correct but potentially confusing because of how we mean "required." I was reading it as the reverse of "Projects can define designated sections in advance of their being required by DefCore." If you can think of a clearer D3 wording, I'd be very happy to submit a patch on your behalf. Rob
Thanks, AlanClark
Board members,
Please find attached the DefCore Board Report for next week's meeting.
Since time is very short for DefCore, we will NOT be reviewing the material in detail. Consequently, we have included ALL the relevant material in the report.
If you have questions, we are having a final DefCore meeting this Wednesday 5/13 @ 9am PT. Details > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DefCoreScale.16
DefCore Report Agenda: * Process 2015A Discussion [5 mins. WARNING MINIMAL TIME] * 2015.04/03 Update [5 mins] * 2015.05 Guideline Approval [5 mins WARNING MINIMAL TIME] * Next Cycle Objectives [5 mins]
For last minute changes, you can see the source here > https://docs.google.com/document/d/12kUWSWt55Ju-okgfEbPt9AH-8UzaQoO_2KzSOHl5 Sg0/edit?usp=sharing
Rob & Egle
--
____________________________ Rob Hirschfeld, 512-773-7522 RackN CEO, Founder
I am in CENTRAL (-6) time http://robhirschfeld.comsmb://linalien/drop/BoardReportMay2015.pdf
twitter: @zehicle, github: cloudedge & ravolt
-- Rob ____________________________ Rob Hirschfeld, 512-773-7522 I am in CENTRAL (-6) time http://robhirschfeld.com twitter: @zehicle, github: cloudedge & ravolt