Hi everyone, To follow up on this process, Thierry and I updated the OpenStack projects map based on feedback provided at the joint leadership meeting and subsequently in the etherpad. Thank you to everyone who took the time to review the map and provide feedback. Unless there are any major issues, we hope to present the current draft as v1 in Sydney and continue iterating over the next cycle. Changes made to v1 based on community feedback: - Added python sdk in the openstack-user bucket, since it is an official SDK - Added Blazar in Orchestration subcategory - Added Tricircle to the operations bucket under a "multi-region tools” subcategory - Added Cyborg to operations bucket under “Optimization" - Moved Freezer to 'Application Lifecycle’ subcategory - Moved Tacker to the "adjacent tech enabler" bucket, in a "NFV” subcategory - Moved Aodh to the "Orchestration” subcategory - Renamed the "OPENSTACK-IAAS" bucket to simply "OPENSTACK” (addressing some issues about what was defined as iaas, and side benefit: this would keep existing links to the main github org working) - Moved Glance to the "shared services” subcategory, based on feedback that it did not fit under virtual machines - Added Zun to a "Containers" column within the "Compute” subcategory, based on feedback that it was a lower level service, not orchestration Outstanding work (post Sydney v2): - Would be nice to be able to dynamically change the map to only show projects that have a given maturity level or higher - e.g. if you set it to "maturity of 6 and above", you'd see a map with Nova, Cinder, Keystone, Neutron, and Swift - There was also a comment about bold vs non-bold projects which is intended to be a maturity/adoption indicator in the meantime Also note we adjusted the layout so it fits more nicely into presentations without having to shrink the font as much. Thanks! Lauren
On Sep 11, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Lauren Sell <lauren@openstack.org> wrote:
Hi everyone,
One more follow up note from me today. In the joint leadership meeting we presented a map of OpenStack deliverables, which includes a new structure to categorize OpenStack projects. The goal is to better communicate “what is OpenStack?” by bucketing the projects according to functionality and simplifying the appearance of the project ecosystem. The map also hides many of the supporting projects, like libraries, to focus on the user-centric deliverables view.
Here’s a link to the presentation the working group put together with the map: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qQ1oCjhEE3bjtjkPydGhyeR6vFyuyFeOhbwc... <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qQ1oCjhEE3bjtjkPydGhyeR6vFyuyFeOhbwc-WueddI/edit#slide=id.g253b34e9c2_0_24>
We’re looking for feedback on the map on slide #3 and the buckets listed on slide #5 (which would equate to git repo directories). If you are unable to view the google presentation, please let me know, and I’ll email you the PDF.
Next steps: 1. Please add any feedback to this etherpad by September 19th — https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/map-feedback <https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/map-feedback> 2. Thierry and I are going to review/consolidate the feedback and work with the Foundation design team to do another rev of the diagram. 3. Once we have the next version ready, we’ll share it back and likely set up a meeting to refine/debate any final points.
The goal is to present the new map by Sydney, but we still need to work through the timeline for updating directory names / Github mirrors and communicating that to all appropriate stakeholders.
Thanks, Lauren
_______________________________________________ Foundation-board mailing list Foundation-board@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board