Instead of call for speakers, maybe we could also list a "call for events" to understand where and when those events would be, to match with potential speakers (or let speaker decide which event they would like to go).

Thought?

Yoyo

2013/7/16 Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com>

Hi,

On 07/15/2013 06:26 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> If I understand correctly you're imagining one or more travelling groups
> of people going together from, say, Hong Kong to Shanghai to Danang to
> Seoul. I was thinking more of one or two people going to *one* place
> after Hong Kong as it would multiply the opportunities and be less
> demanding on the speakers. The time commitment would probably be of an
> extra 3, 4 days after the Hong Kong event.

Either of those approaches work. I think that a group could potentially
do 2 events in the 3-4 days after the Summit.

> I'd suggest we setup a call for speakers (an online form and a message
> to the lists + blog post) as soon as possible to evaluate if there is
> enough people willing to stay in the area after the Summit. We can then
> try to match the offers with the requests to host events and adjust rapidly.
>
> Thoughts?

Sounds sane.

Cheers,
Dave.


--
Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13

_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
Community@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community

_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
Community@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community