On May 20, 2016 4:41 AM, "Florian Haas" <florian@hastexo.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Adam Lawson <alawson@aqorn.com> wrote:
> > I think the dynamic links and removing static links (of voting is preserved)
> > is awesome. I apparently missed that.
> >
> > Huge+1 from me on that idea.
>
> I think this is a good idea as well, with one minor detail though: as
> a community reviewer, I'd like to be able to give a talk just a
> cursory review, not immediately make a decision on how to grade or
> what to comment, and come back to it later. With static links that's
> easy: I can simply compile my own bookmark list. With dynamic/random
> links, the system would have to provide an alternative.
>
> So, rather than inventing a separate bookmark system, maybe make links
> static per-user? Meaning every logged-in user gets a different link
> for the same talk, but for that user the link doesn't change? That
> still keeps me from sharing the link to my own talk (or more
> precisely, make it useless — another user would simply get a 404 if
> they tried to open it), but allows me to compile my own bookmarks.
>
> Just an idea.

And a darned good one, IMHO.

I just typed (and erased) that it might me too complex to code in time, as part of the point was to lessen developer workload, but I've actually just thought of a simple way to do it; let me know if you want help. (If we go this way.)

---- Nick