The oslo project is also missed off for the git statistics. Is there an easy way to capture the IRC activity and trends ? Tim From: Yujie Du [mailto:duyujie.dyj@gmail.com] Sent: 04 July 2013 13:29 To: Stefano Maffulli Cc: community@lists.openstack.org; marketing@lists.openstack.org; user-committee@lists.openstack.org; Gordon, Joe Subject: Re: [User-committee] [OpenStack Marketing] [openstack-community] qyjohn's quarterly report of the size and health of the 4 open source projects is out Here is the English report from my friend Qingye: http://www.qyjohn.net/?p=3321 And I will give him the feedback. 2013/7/4 Stefano Maffulli <stefano@openstack.org> On 07/04/2013 11:03 AM, Gordon, Joe wrote:
The git commit numbers look way off, for the reasons you mentioned below.
These numbers are more accurate (at least with regard to OpenStack - AFAIK they mine teh data from github.com/openstack) : [...]
From: Atwood, Mark Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 11:47 AM To: [...] The data sources for discussion thread metrics for OpenStack are https://lists.openstack.net/openstack/ https://answers.launchpad.net/openstack/ http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/*/ https://ask.openstack.org/
Is he missing any public discussion forums about OpenStack of import that we should bring to his attention? I think he's missing a lot of discussions that don't happen on openstack.org. domains, like the discussions on meetup.com, google groups, G+, Facebook group, etc. Some of these stats we don't track either (yet), but we're pushing forward an effort to consolidate these
I think this is a better link, listing Apache CloudStack: http://www.ohloh.net/p/compare?project_0=OpenStack&project_1=Eucalyptus&project_2=Apache+CloudStack sources and give users a better/easiest way to find peers. For example, we now host mailing lists in non-english languages on lists.openstack.org (at the moment Vietnamese, Italian and Spanish) and we're starting a project for a user group portal that will aggregate things from meetup.com.
His also mines the git repos for quantum, keystone, glance, horizon, swift, cinder, and nova. This misses the contributions by incubation projects, preincubation projects, the infrastructure projects, and client projects. That's the least solid part of his report. Ohloh does a better job, even if the way OpenStack uses git and github makes numbers less comparable across projects. The lack of source code for the git analysis on ohloh and john's report makes both of them less of a 'reliable source' for quote to me.
/stef -- Ask and answer questions on https://ask.openstack.org _______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list Marketing@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/marketing -- --Ben Trystack.cn By Stacker, for Stacker! Blog: duyujie.org WEIBO: http://weibo.com/u/1716287123 TWITTER: https://twitter.com/ben_Duyujie LINKEDIN: cn.linkedin.com/in/duyujie About me: http://about.me/Yujie.Du