Hi, On 05/19/2016 09:38 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I feel like this system assumes bad faith on the part of the contributor (speaker, reviewer, and voter), and tries to enforce good behavior through rules and technology. I would rather we have a more public way of selecting track chairs and then have faith in them to evaluate talks objectively for relevance and quality, sharing guidance and feedback as part of the process.
This pretty much summarises my view also. Transparency and accountability of those who choose, and trust that the senior, qualified members of our community who are chosen will do what is in the greater good. Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338