18 May
2016
18 May
'16
11:02 a.m.
On 05/18/2016 12:54 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
Let me clarify my statement.
In the current format - where the votes are more or less ignored by the track owners and the they are there for 'eye candy' - then I think there is absolutely no benefit in using the voting process.
As far as I understand - that is the situation today. The votes have no official weight or influence on the sessions that will be selected. Track chairs have
If we can come to an agreed format that the votes DO have say - but NOT the only or main criteria - then it is worthwhile.
I see. I proposed an alternative (and in my humble opinion, advantageous) voting scheme upthread — would you mind sharing your opinion on that? Cheers, Florian