From jbryce at jbryce.com Mon Nov 4 03:00:18 2019 From: jbryce at jbryce.com (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 21:00:18 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [OpenInfra Summit Shanghai] Some wrong information at Shanghai Summit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <16e345a4ee0.27a5.eb5fa01e01bf15c6e0d805bdb1ad935e@jbryce.com> Hi Trinh, I apologize for the error on the presentation. We have corrected it in version of the slides that will be distributed. We definitely appreciate the efforts of all of the community organizers, and I'm sorry for the mix up. Jonathan On November 3, 2019 20:55:34 Trinh Nguyen wrote: > Dear OSF, > > I don't attend the Shanghai summit but I notice some pictures of the > presentation which Jonathan Bryce is delivering. The attached photo is > about the OpenInfra Days around the world and the one on the left is > OpenInfra Days Vietnam, not Korea. I know it's just a little thing but > because it already upset some of our community members I would like to ask > for correction. The Vietnam OpenInfra Community has been putting lots of > effort to be recognize so please understand. > > Bests, > > Trinh > > -- > > Trinh Nguyen > www.edlab.xyz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dangtrinhnt at gmail.com Mon Nov 4 03:02:49 2019 From: dangtrinhnt at gmail.com (Trinh Nguyen) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:02:49 +0900 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [OpenInfra Summit Shanghai] Some wrong information at Shanghai Summit In-Reply-To: <16e345a4ee0.27a5.eb5fa01e01bf15c6e0d805bdb1ad935e@jbryce.com> References: <16e345a4ee0.27a5.eb5fa01e01bf15c6e0d805bdb1ad935e@jbryce.com> Message-ID: Thank Jonathan for the quick response. I really appreciate that. Bests, On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 12:00 PM Jonathan Bryce wrote: > Hi Trinh, > > I apologize for the error on the presentation. We have corrected it in > version of the slides that will be distributed. > > We definitely appreciate the efforts of all of the community organizers, > and I'm sorry for the mix up. > > Jonathan > > > On November 3, 2019 20:55:34 Trinh Nguyen wrote: > >> Dear OSF, >> >> I don't attend the Shanghai summit but I notice some pictures of the >> presentation which Jonathan Bryce is delivering. The attached photo is >> about the OpenInfra Days around the world and the one on the left is *OpenInfra >> Days Vietnam*, not Korea. I know it's just a little thing but because it >> already upset some of our community members I would like to ask for >> correction. The Vietnam OpenInfra Community has been putting lots of effort >> to be recognize so please understand. >> >> Bests, >> >> Trinh >> >> -- >> *Trinh Nguyen* >> *www.edlab.xyz * >> >> > -- *Trinh Nguyen* *www.edlab.xyz * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ushnishtha at hotmail.com Sun Nov 3 02:38:49 2019 From: ushnishtha at hotmail.com (Egle Sigler) Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 02:38:49 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Interop Board Report Message-ID: Hello Everyone, I am attaching a pdf of the board report since google doesn't work in China. For those not in China, it is available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E8DwY-BGQdcy-u7jQOeGsWUh06yXNGNyk_yZvTTtXbo/edit?usp=sharing Thank you, Egle -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Interop WG Board Report November 2019, Shanghai.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 109793 bytes Desc: Interop WG Board Report November 2019, Shanghai.pdf URL: From dangtrinhnt at gmail.com Mon Nov 4 02:18:54 2019 From: dangtrinhnt at gmail.com (Trinh Nguyen) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:18:54 +0900 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [OpenInfra Summit Shanghai] Some wrong information at Shanghai Summit Message-ID: Dear OSF, I don't attend the Shanghai summit but I notice some pictures of the presentation which Jonathan Bryce is delivering. The attached photo is about the OpenInfra Days around the world and the one on the left is *OpenInfra Days Vietnam*, not Korea. I know it's just a little thing but because it already upset some of our community members I would like to ask for correction. The Vietnam OpenInfra Community has been putting lots of effort to be recognize so please understand. Bests, Trinh -- *Trinh Nguyen* *www.edlab.xyz * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: photo_2019-11-04_11-00-27.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 191246 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: photo_2019-11-04_11-09-59.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 112337 bytes Desc: not available URL: From amy at demarco.com Sun Nov 17 22:25:44 2019 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:25:44 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] Diversity WG Meeting reminder 11/18 Message-ID: The Diversity & Inclusion WG will hold its next meeting tomorrow at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-diversity channel. The agenda can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda. Please feel free to add any other topics you wish to discuss at the meeting. Thanks, Amy (spotz) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jonathan at openstack.org Thu Nov 21 19:07:47 2019 From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:07:47 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] 2020 OpenStack Individual Director nominations are open Message-ID: <413B9A04-2AB1-4C33-82A8-FE2312D93D4B@openstack.org> Hi everyone, The nominating period is now open for candidates in the 2020 OSF Board of Director Individual Member elections. You can visit https://www.openstack.org/election/2020-individual-director-election/ for more information on the election or to nominate an individual member of the OpenStack Foundation as a candidate. The requirements for nominating any individual to run for the Board must be completed and received by the OpenStack Foundation on or prior to 23:59 UTC on December 13, 2019. If anyone has any questions, please reach out to me. Jonathan From alanclark at openstack.org Mon Nov 25 16:39:04 2019 From: alanclark at openstack.org (Alan Clark) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:39:04 -0700 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] OpenStack Board Call, December 10, 2019, 7am pacific Message-ID: <014401d5a3ae$da0deb80$8e29c280$@openstack.org> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 5248 bytes Desc: not available URL: From gr at ham.ie Tue Nov 26 12:55:28 2019 From: gr at ham.ie (Graham Hayes) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:55:28 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign Message-ID: Hey All, I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it was created to facilitate. [1] A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? - Graham 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ From thierry at openstack.org Tue Nov 26 13:01:05 2019 From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:01:05 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org> Graham Hayes wrote: > I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is > a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in > a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it > was created to facilitate. [1] > > A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a > community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and > uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. > > What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on > behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use > its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? It probably makes more sense (and has more weight) at the Foundation-level. -- Thierry Carrez From sean.mcginnis at gmail.com Tue Nov 26 14:14:29 2019 From: sean.mcginnis at gmail.com (Sean McGinnis) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:14:29 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: > > Hey All, > > I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is > a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in > a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it > was created to facilitate. [1] > > A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a > community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and > uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. > > What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on > behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use > its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? > > - Graham > > > 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ > I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add their names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to the list of organizations. Sean From jean-philippe at evrard.me Tue Nov 26 14:25:05 2019 From: jean-philippe at evrard.me (Jean-Philippe Evrard) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:25:05 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <21b14ae74ca92eeae7da448e2f5076d2297310fe.camel@evrard.me> Hello, I agree with others: IMO, it is the Foundation who should act on this. I would love to see the OpenStack Foundation logo out there. Thank Graham for showing us this petition! Regards, JP From gr at ham.ie Tue Nov 26 14:33:10 2019 From: gr at ham.ie (Graham Hayes) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:33:10 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <21b14ae74ca92eeae7da448e2f5076d2297310fe.camel@evrard.me> References: <21b14ae74ca92eeae7da448e2f5076d2297310fe.camel@evrard.me> Message-ID: On 26/11/2019 14:25, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > Hello, > > I agree with others: IMO, it is the Foundation who should act on this. > I would love to see the OpenStack Foundation logo out there. > > Thank Graham for showing us this petition! > > Regards, > JP > I am not sure of the procedure, I am more than willing to put this on the board agenda for Dec 10th, if that is allowed. It should be a simple board resolution along the lines of: The Board supports the aims of the savedotorg campaign, and resolves to add its name to the list of supporting organizations. Unless someone shouts I will propose it on the agenda [1] by EOW. 1 - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/10December2019BoardMeeting > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > From gr at ham.ie Tue Nov 26 14:34:09 2019 From: gr at ham.ie (Graham Hayes) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:34:09 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47a312e7-fc13-c9df-16ce-1117fbc7633e@ham.ie> On 26/11/2019 14:14, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: >> >> Hey All, >> >> I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is >> a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in >> a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it >> was created to facilitate. [1] >> >> A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a >> community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and >> uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. >> >> What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on >> behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use >> its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? >> >> - Graham >> >> >> 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ >> > > I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add their > names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to the list of > organizations. Yeap - that is a good point - I would encourage people who agree with the petition to sign as individuals as well. > Sean > From amy at demarco.com Tue Nov 26 14:50:02 2019 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:50:02 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <057BD0AC-451C-4E64-9D30-6CC6A20DFA0F@demarco.com> I agree with the OSF submitting on behalf of OpenStack and the other projects. I also like the idea of individuals signing as contributors. Amy Marrich (spotz) > On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:17 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: >> >> Hey All, >> >> I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is >> a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in >> a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it >> was created to facilitate. [1] >> >> A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a >> community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and >> uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. >> >> What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on >> behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use >> its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? >> >> - Graham >> >> >> 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ >> > > I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add their > names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to the list of > organizations. > > Sean > From jimmy at openstack.org Tue Nov 26 16:16:14 2019 From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:16:14 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <057BD0AC-451C-4E64-9D30-6CC6A20DFA0F@demarco.com> References: <057BD0AC-451C-4E64-9D30-6CC6A20DFA0F@demarco.com> Message-ID: <1595EA09-2B8C-45ED-B836-5751FC79DBA1@openstack.org> From my reading of the situation, it’s a done deal. It seems like ICAAN just crammed it through. Is there new info out that could reverse it? Thanks, Jimmy > On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Amy wrote: > > I agree with the OSF submitting on behalf of OpenStack and the other projects. I also like the idea of individuals signing as contributors. > > Amy Marrich (spotz) > >>> On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:17 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: >>> >>> Hey All, >>> >>> I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is >>> a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in >>> a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it >>> was created to facilitate. [1] >>> >>> A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a >>> community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and >>> uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. >>> >>> What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on >>> behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use >>> its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? >>> >>> - Graham >>> >>> >>> 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ >>> >> >> I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add their >> names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to the list of >> organizations. >> >> Sean >> > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From gr at ham.ie Tue Nov 26 16:34:42 2019 From: gr at ham.ie (Graham Hayes) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 16:34:42 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <1595EA09-2B8C-45ED-B836-5751FC79DBA1@openstack.org> References: <057BD0AC-451C-4E64-9D30-6CC6A20DFA0F@demarco.com> <1595EA09-2B8C-45ED-B836-5751FC79DBA1@openstack.org> Message-ID: On 26/11/2019 16:16, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > From my reading of the situation, it’s a done deal. It seems like ICAAN just crammed it through. Is there new info out that could reverse it? > > Thanks, > Jimmy My understanding is it looks bleak, but there is a chance to shame the owners into halting the sale. I think ICAAN can still block the same (until December 13th, 30 days after they were notified), and through pure poor marketing, and raising our voices, this could help convince the current owners of PIR (who is ISOC) to re-consider the idea. >> On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Amy wrote: >> >> I agree with the OSF submitting on behalf of OpenStack and the other projects. I also like the idea of individuals signing as contributors. >> >> Amy Marrich (spotz) >> >>>> On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:17 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>> I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is >>>> a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in >>>> a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it >>>> was created to facilitate. [1] >>>> >>>> A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a >>>> community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and >>>> uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. >>>> >>>> What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on >>>> behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use >>>> its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? >>>> >>>> - Graham >>>> >>>> >>>> 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ >>>> >>> >>> I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add their >>> names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to the list of >>> organizations. >>> >>> Sean >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Foundation mailing list >> Foundation at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > From jimmy at tipit.net Tue Nov 26 16:49:21 2019 From: jimmy at tipit.net (Jimmy Mcarthur) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:49:21 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: <057BD0AC-451C-4E64-9D30-6CC6A20DFA0F@demarco.com> <1595EA09-2B8C-45ED-B836-5751FC79DBA1@openstack.org> Message-ID: <5DDD5791.8050506@tipit.net> > Graham Hayes > November 26, 2019 at 10:34 AM > > > My understanding is it looks bleak, but there is a chance to shame the > owners into halting the sale. > > I think ICAAN can still block the same (until December 13th, 30 days > after they were notified), and through pure poor marketing, and > raising our voices, this could help convince the current owners of > PIR (who is ISOC) to re-consider the idea. Great news! Thanks for the clarification. I already added my name to the list and definitely agree about the Foundation support. I'll raise it on our ML as well. > > >>> On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Amy wrote: >>> >>> I agree with the OSF submitting on behalf of OpenStack and the other projects. I also like the idea of individuals signing as contributors. >>> >>> Amy Marrich (spotz) >>> >>>>> On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:17 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey All, >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is >>>>> a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in >>>>> a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it >>>>> was created to facilitate. [1] >>>>> >>>>> A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a >>>>> community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and >>>>> uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. >>>>> >>>>> What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on >>>>> behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use >>>>> its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? >>>>> >>>>> - Graham >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ >>>>> >>>> I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add their >>>> names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to the list of >>>> organizations. >>>> >>>> Sean >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Foundation mailing list >>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > Jimmy McArthur > November 26, 2019 at 10:16 AM > From my reading of the situation, it’s a done deal. It seems like > ICAAN just crammed it through. Is there new info out that could > reverse it? > > Thanks, > Jimmy > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation > Amy > November 26, 2019 at 8:50 AM > I agree with the OSF submitting on behalf of OpenStack and the other > projects. I also like the idea of individuals signing as contributors. > > Amy Marrich (spotz) > > > _______________________________________________ > Foundation mailing list > Foundation at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gr at ham.ie Tue Nov 26 17:33:23 2019 From: gr at ham.ie (Graham Hayes) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:33:23 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: <057BD0AC-451C-4E64-9D30-6CC6A20DFA0F@demarco.com> <1595EA09-2B8C-45ED-B836-5751FC79DBA1@openstack.org> Message-ID: <2a19b6c1-c769-7725-7bb9-3998cdfe34c5@ham.ie> On 26/11/2019 16:44, Alan Clark wrote: > Who owns savedotorg.org? I see EFF references on the page but when I look it up the domain it appears to all be "REDACTED". >From https://savedotorg.org/index.php/about/ - it is ran by NTEN (https://www.nten.org/) It is supported by the EFF (among others) > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Graham Hayes [mailto:gr at ham.ie] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 9:35 AM >> To: Jimmy McArthur >> Cc: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org; foundation- >> board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack >> community support to the savedotorg campaign >> >> On 26/11/2019 16:16, Jimmy McArthur wrote: >>> From my reading of the situation, it’s a done deal. It seems like ICAAN just >> crammed it through. Is there new info out that could reverse it? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jimmy >> >> My understanding is it looks bleak, but there is a chance to shame the owners >> into halting the sale. >> >> I think ICAAN can still block the same (until December 13th, 30 days after they >> were notified), and through pure poor marketing, and raising our voices, this >> could help convince the current owners of PIR (who is ISOC) to re-consider the >> idea. >> >> >>>> On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Amy wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree with the OSF submitting on behalf of OpenStack and the other projects. >> I also like the idea of individuals signing as contributors. >>>> >>>> Amy Marrich (spotz) >>>> >>>>>> On Nov 26, 2019, at 8:17 AM, Sean McGinnis >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there >>>>>> is a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the >>>>>> works, in a way that may not be in the best interests of the non >>>>>> profits that it was created to facilitate. [1] >>>>>> >>>>>> A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a >>>>>> community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and uses >>>>>> a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on >>>>>> behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should >>>>>> use its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? >>>>>> >>>>>> - Graham >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add >>>>> their names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to >>>>> the list of organizations. >>>>> >>>>> Sean >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Foundation mailing list >>>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Foundation mailing list >> Foundation at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Tue Nov 26 18:13:43 2019 From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:13:43 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org> References: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org> Message-ID: <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> Sounds good -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Carrez Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:01 AM To: Graham Hayes; foundation-board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Graham Hayes wrote: > I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is > a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, > in a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that > it was created to facilitate. [1] > > A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a > community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and uses a > .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. > > What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on > behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use > its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? It probably makes more sense (and has more weight) at the Foundation-level. -- Thierry Carrez _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation From mark.radcliffe at dlapiper.com Tue Nov 26 18:58:14 2019 From: mark.radcliffe at dlapiper.com (Radcliffe, Mark) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:58:14 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> References: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org> <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> Message-ID: I am enclosing the statement by the Apache Software Foundation: https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the-apache-software-foundation-objects. -----Original Message----- From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 10:14 AM To: thierry at openstack.org; gr at ham.ie; foundation-board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Foundation Board] [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign [EXTERNAL] Sounds good -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Carrez Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:01 AM To: Graham Hayes; foundation-board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Graham Hayes wrote: > I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is > a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, > in a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that > it was created to facilitate. [1] > > A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a > community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and uses a > .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. > > What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on > behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use > its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? It probably makes more sense (and has more weight) at the Foundation-level. -- Thierry Carrez _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation _______________________________________________ Foundation-board mailing list Foundation-board at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to postmaster at dlapiper.com. Thank you. From rv6848 at att.com Tue Nov 26 22:20:12 2019 From: rv6848 at att.com (VAN WYK, RYAN L) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:20:12 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Foundation Board] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> References: <0ce58718-427a-036b-1c28-192cf3e9b88c@openstack.org>, <6cb8c720cfe24846b097249b0e2c2652@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> Message-ID: <9E1D3E71-47DB-4E82-9D7E-5EAFAAFD846D@att.com> Agree Ryan van Wyk VP – Network Cloud AT&T 1010 Pine St., 18th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63101 m 312.860.0966 | rv6848 at att.com MOBILIZING YOUR WORLD On Nov 26, 2019, at 1:14 PM, "Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com" wrote: Sounds good -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Carrez Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:01 AM To: Graham Hayes; foundation-board at lists.openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Graham Hayes wrote: I am not sure if this has been seen by everyone or not - but there is a change in how the .org top level domain is being ran in the works, in a way that may not be in the best interests of the non profits that it was created to facilitate. [1] A lot of well known non profits have already joined, and as a community that has an interest in the internet as a whole, and uses a .org domain, I think we should add our voice in support. What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? It probably makes more sense (and has more weight) at the Foundation-level. -- Thierry Carrez _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=-D-CQxfZGanK68LdN-oWCaJXiTIKLszl2xUfL-mitiw&s=6mTtX_-h5RGZQPlYpynQP6VcRDkgY8ro-ahRlZsQtP4&e= _______________________________________________ Foundation-board mailing list Foundation-board at lists.openstack.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation-2Dboard&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=-D-CQxfZGanK68LdN-oWCaJXiTIKLszl2xUfL-mitiw&s=TNbHw6ik-P6rNVmG3GKHta7XHO0HdatGLdoRtjoaBZM&e= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kurt at garloff.de Wed Nov 27 05:33:26 2019 From: kurt at garloff.de (Kurt Garloff) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:33:26 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [tc][board][all] - Adding OpenStack community support to the savedotorg campaign In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <29A4C161-3519-463C-A568-5A25651002C1@garloff.de> Hi, On 26 November 2019 15:14:29 CET, Sean McGinnis wrote: >On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 7:00 AM Graham Hayes wrote: >>[...] >> What do people think? Are we happy to have the TC use its voice on >> behalf of the OpenStack project, or do we think the board should use >> its voice on behalf of the entire foundation? >> >> - Graham >> >> >> 1 - https://savedotorg.org/ >> > >I agree this is a Foundation level thing (though individuals can add >their names to the petition as well). I would support adding OSF to the list >of organizations. +1 -- Kurt Garloff , Cologne, Germany (Sent from Mobile with K9.) From amy at demarco.com Wed Nov 27 17:41:52 2019 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:41:52 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [Diversity] Meeting Reminder Message-ID: Just wanted to remind everyone we will hold the next Diversity and Inclusion Working Group meeting on Monday, 12/2 at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-diversity. Agendas can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda Thanks, Amy (spotz) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: