From ashlee at openstack.org  Mon Feb  4 18:26:57 2019
From: ashlee at openstack.org (Ashlee Ferguson)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 12:26:57 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Open Infrastructure Summit Denver -
 Community Voting Open
In-Reply-To: <6B02F9A1-28A7-4F43-85E1-66AD570ED37B@openstack.org>
References: <6B02F9A1-28A7-4F43-85E1-66AD570ED37B@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <5164AFCF-285F-43F0-8718-A8F9DDCAF48A@openstack.org>

Hi everyone,

Just under 12 hours left to vote for the sessions <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/vote-for-speakers> you’d like to see at the Denver Open Infrastructure Summit <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019>!


REGISTER
Register for the Summit <https://openinfrasummitandptgdenver.eventbrite.com/> before prices increase in late February!

VISA APPLICATION PROCESS
Make sure to secure your Visa soon. More information <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support> about the Visa application process.

TRAVEL SUPPORT PROGRAM
February 27 is the last day to submit applications. Please submit your applications <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support> by 11:59pm Pacific Time (February 28 at 7:59am UTC).

If you have any questions, please email summit at openstack.org <mailto:summit at openstack.org>.


Cheers,
Ashlee


Ashlee Ferguson
OpenStack Foundation
ashlee at openstack.org




> On Jan 31, 2019, at 12:29 PM, Ashlee Ferguson <ashlee at openstack.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Community voting for the Open Infrastructure Summit Denver sessions is open! 
> 
> You can VOTE HERE <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/vote-for-speakers>, but what does that mean? 
> 
> Now that the Call for Presentations has closed, all submissions are available for community vote and input. After community voting closes, the volunteer Programming Committee members will receive the presentations to review and determine the final selections for Summit schedule. While community votes are meant to help inform the decision, Programming Committee members are expected to exercise judgment in their area of expertise and help ensure diversity of sessions and speakers. View full details of the session selection process here <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/call-for-presentations/selection-process/>.
> 
> In order to vote, you need an OSF community membership. If you do not have an account, please create one by going to openstack.org/join <http://openstack.org/join>. If you need to reset your password, you can do that here <https://www.openstack.org/Security/lostpassword>. 
> 
> Hurry, voting closes Monday, February 4 at 11:59pm Pacific Time (Tuesday, February 5 at 7:59 UTC).
> 
> Continue to visit https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019 <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019> for all Summit-related information.
> 
> REGISTER
> Register for the Summit <https://openinfrasummitandptgdenver.eventbrite.com/> before prices increase in late February!
> 
> VISA APPLICATION PROCESS
> Make sure to secure your Visa soon. More information <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support> about the Visa application process.
> 
> TRAVEL SUPPORT PROGRAM
> February 27 is the last day to submit applications. Please submit your applications <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support> by 11:59pm Pacific Time (February 28 at 7:59am UTC).
> 
> If you have any questions, please email summit at openstack.org <mailto:summit at openstack.org>.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ashlee
> 
> 
> Ashlee Ferguson
> OpenStack Foundation
> ashlee at openstack.org <mailto:ashlee at openstack.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190204/0a99dfae/attachment-0001.html>

From thierry at openstack.org  Wed Feb  6 15:53:27 2019
From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:53:27 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate
	org
Message-ID: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>

Hi everyone,

Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under 
attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their 
software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open 
source, or at least being confused with open source.

That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important 
than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition for 
over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the 
definition, while informing people and discouraging license proliferation.

This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so 
I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate 
organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the Mozilla 
Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software 
Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.

You can learn more about the process at:
https://opensource.org/affiliates/about

Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?

On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, but 
not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source 
software is built, not just how the resulting software is licensed. 
However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open 
source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate would give us 
opportunities to have those new standardization discussion at that level.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)


From mnaser at vexxhost.com  Wed Feb  6 15:57:23 2019
From: mnaser at vexxhost.com (Mohammed Naser)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:57:23 -0500
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <CAEs876hLf7F-9UpftAyVtpqc2YYmc-r--veDkK5uEyPrjhEF=Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:54 AM Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under
> attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their
> software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open
> source, or at least being confused with open source.
>
> That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important
> than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition for
> over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the
> definition, while informing people and discouraging license proliferation.
>
> This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so
> I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate
> organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the Mozilla
> Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software
> Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.
>
> You can learn more about the process at:
> https://opensource.org/affiliates/about

I think this is great and sits well within the values that we worked hard
to build over the past few years within OpenStack.

FYI, don't forget to select "Affiliate Scheme" :)

> Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
>
> On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, but
> not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source
> software is built, not just how the resulting software is licensed.
> However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open
> source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate would give us
> opportunities to have those new standardization discussion at that level.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation



-- 
Mohammed Naser — vexxhost
-----------------------------------------------------
D. 514-316-8872
D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200
E. mnaser at vexxhost.com
W. http://vexxhost.com


From noggin143 at gmail.com  Wed Feb  6 16:09:37 2019
From: noggin143 at gmail.com (Tim Bell)
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 17:09:37 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <CAEs876hLf7F-9UpftAyVtpqc2YYmc-r--veDkK5uEyPrjhEF=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <CAEs876hLf7F-9UpftAyVtpqc2YYmc-r--veDkK5uEyPrjhEF=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C8B8D8BB-1AA2-4587-A132-126846A5701D@gmail.com>

Thierry,

Are there any legal implications, such as " This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without regard to its conflict of laws principles. The parties hereby submit to the jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in Santa Clara, California." ? 

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Mohammed Naser <mnaser at vexxhost.com>
Date: Wednesday, 6 February 2019 at 16:58
To: Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
Cc: "<foundation at lists.openstack.org>" <foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

    On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:54 AM Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
    >
    > Hi everyone,
    >
    > Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under
    > attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their
    > software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open
    > source, or at least being confused with open source.
    >
    > That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important
    > than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition for
    > over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the
    > definition, while informing people and discouraging license proliferation.
    >
    > This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so
    > I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate
    > organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the Mozilla
    > Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software
    > Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.
    >
    > You can learn more about the process at:
    > https://opensource.org/affiliates/about
    
    I think this is great and sits well within the values that we worked hard
    to build over the past few years within OpenStack.
    
    FYI, don't forget to select "Affiliate Scheme" :)
    
    > Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
    >
    > On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, but
    > not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source
    > software is built, not just how the resulting software is licensed.
    > However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open
    > source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate would give us
    > opportunities to have those new standardization discussion at that level.
    >
    > --
    > Thierry Carrez (ttx)
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Foundation mailing list
    > Foundation at lists.openstack.org
    > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
    
    
    
    -- 
    Mohammed Naser — vexxhost
    -----------------------------------------------------
    D. 514-316-8872
    D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200
    E. mnaser at vexxhost.com
    W. http://vexxhost.com
    
    _______________________________________________
    Foundation mailing list
    Foundation at lists.openstack.org
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
    




From mrhillsman at gmail.com  Wed Feb  6 17:06:26 2019
From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:06:26 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <C8B8D8BB-1AA2-4587-A132-126846A5701D@gmail.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <CAEs876hLf7F-9UpftAyVtpqc2YYmc-r--veDkK5uEyPrjhEF=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <C8B8D8BB-1AA2-4587-A132-126846A5701D@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMVtB2F7_5x4QVRp-M2WvJvnOFZnXn8QRY8uzFKC+oG3NROsdg@mail.gmail.com>

Agree with Mohammed in spirit and Tim in thought. tldr +1 barring any legal
issues.

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:10 AM Tim Bell <noggin143 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thierry,
>
> Are there any legal implications, such as " This Agreement shall be
> governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without
> regard to its conflict of laws principles. The parties hereby submit to the
> jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in Santa Clara,
> California." ?
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mohammed Naser <mnaser at vexxhost.com>
> Date: Wednesday, 6 February 2019 at 16:58
> To: Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
> Cc: "<foundation at lists.openstack.org>" <foundation at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
> affiliate org
>
>     On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:54 AM Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
> wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi everyone,
>     >
>     > Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under
>     > attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their
>     > software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open
>     > source, or at least being confused with open source.
>     >
>     > That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more
> important
>     > than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition
> for
>     > over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the
>     > definition, while informing people and discouraging license
> proliferation.
>     >
>     > This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives,
> so
>     > I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an
> affiliate
>     > organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the
> Mozilla
>     > Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software
>     > Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.
>     >
>     > You can learn more about the process at:
>     > https://opensource.org/affiliates/about
>
>     I think this is great and sits well within the values that we worked
> hard
>     to build over the past few years within OpenStack.
>
>     FYI, don't forget to select "Affiliate Scheme" :)
>
>     > Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
>     >
>     > On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary,
> but
>     > not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source
>     > software is built, not just how the resulting software is licensed.
>     > However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open
>     > source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate would give
> us
>     > opportunities to have those new standardization discussion at that
> level.
>     >
>     > --
>     > Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Foundation mailing list
>     > Foundation at lists.openstack.org
>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>
>
>
>     --
>     Mohammed Naser — vexxhost
>     -----------------------------------------------------
>     D. 514-316-8872
>     D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200
>     E. mnaser at vexxhost.com
>     W. http://vexxhost.com
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Foundation mailing list
>     Foundation at lists.openstack.org
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>


-- 
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhillsman at gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190206/d2e41890/attachment.html>

From doug at doughellmann.com  Wed Feb  6 18:29:18 2019
From: doug at doughellmann.com (Doug Hellmann)
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:29:18 -0500
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
	affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <m2imxwg48x.fsf@doughellmann.com>

Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> writes:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under 
> attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their 
> software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open 
> source, or at least being confused with open source.
>
> That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important 
> than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition for 
> over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the 
> definition, while informing people and discouraging license proliferation.
>
> This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so 
> I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate 
> organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the Mozilla 
> Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software 
> Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.
>
> You can learn more about the process at:
> https://opensource.org/affiliates/about
>
> Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
>
> On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, but 
> not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source 
> software is built, not just how the resulting software is licensed. 
> However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open 
> source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate would give us 
> opportunities to have those new standardization discussion at that level.
>
> -- 
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation

+1 for signing on as an affiliate.

-- 
Doug


From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com  Wed Feb  6 18:56:02 2019
From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:56:02 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate	org
In-Reply-To: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>

Thierry,
Putting my Finance committee hat.

Do you know what are OSI expectations on contributions?
◾To make annual contributions towards the running of OSI where possible.

Thanks,
Arkady

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 9:53 AM
To: foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 

Hi everyone,

Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open source, or at least being confused with open source.

That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition for over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the definition, while informing people and discouraging license proliferation.

This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the Mozilla Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.

You can learn more about the process at:
https://opensource.org/affiliates/about

Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?

On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, but not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source software is built, not just how the resulting software is licensed. 
However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate would give us opportunities to have those new standardization discussion at that level.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation

From Anni.Lai at huawei.com  Thu Feb  7 00:54:53 2019
From: Anni.Lai at huawei.com (Anni Lai)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 00:54:53 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate	org
In-Reply-To: <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>
Message-ID: <31ECD4E1A0C9AA449EFF026969B3802544EE9EEF@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>

The sponsors, and the annual corporate revenues annual donations are listed here - https://opensource.org/sponsors

I do have one question though - I see Linux Foundation (sponsor) and Eclipse Foundation (supporter) are listed, but I don't see Apache Foundation. Does anyone have any insight as why Apache is not here? 

Anni 

-----Original Message-----
From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com [mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 10:56 AM
To: thierry at openstack.org; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

Thierry,
Putting my Finance committee hat.

Do you know what are OSI expectations on contributions?
◾To make annual contributions towards the running of OSI where possible.

Thanks,
Arkady

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 9:53 AM
To: foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 

Hi everyone,

Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open source, or at least being confused with open source.

That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition for over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the definition, while informing people and discouraging license proliferation.

This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the Mozilla Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.

You can learn more about the process at:
https://opensource.org/affiliates/about

Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?

On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, but not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source software is built, not just how the resulting software is licensed. 
However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate would give us opportunities to have those new standardization discussion at that level.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation

From mordred at inaugust.com  Thu Feb  7 01:06:46 2019
From: mordred at inaugust.com (Monty Taylor)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 01:06:46 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <a0b6d803-53c0-77b2-31b1-6f6f9cc0b8b7@inaugust.com>



On 2/6/19 3:53 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under 
> attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their 
> software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open 
> source, or at least being confused with open source.
> 
> That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important 
> than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition for 
> over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the 
> definition, while informing people and discouraging license proliferation.
> 
> This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so 
> I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate 
> organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the Mozilla 
> Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software 
> Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.
> 
> You can learn more about the process at:
> https://opensource.org/affiliates/about
> 
> Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
> 
> On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, but 
> not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source 
> software is built, not just how the resulting software is licensed. 
> However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open 
> source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate would give us 
> opportunities to have those new standardization discussion at that level.
> 

++


From thierry at openstack.org  Thu Feb  7 09:33:20 2019
From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:33:20 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>
Message-ID: <57da5ef2-bfe4-f56d-4520-f5fdca24fa2f@openstack.org>

Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com wrote:
> Thierry,
> Putting my Finance committee hat.
> 
> Do you know what are OSI expectations on contributions?
> ◾To make annual contributions towards the running of OSI where possible.

The agreement[1] goes into more details. It states that as an OSI 
Affiliate Member you have the following responsibility:

"To the extent possible, make annual and/or project-specific 
contributions, monetary and/or otherwise, to aid OSI and its 
special-interest projects."

[1] https://opensource.org/affiliateAgreement

I was thinking that our contribution could be to support their messaging 
with our communications, and have staff participate in their initiatives 
where applicable. I'm definitely interested in engaging more directly 
with OSI, for the reasons I explained in the last paragraph on my email. 
I don't think we should "sponsor" them as I find weird to have 
Foundations sponsor other Foundations (but I encourage our members to 
become sponsors of OSI !).

Allison Randal was on OSI board of directors, maybe she can clarify what 
that expectation is. In all cases, if we start this process we would 
have that agreement reviewed by our lawyers to clarify our commitments 
before we proceed.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)


From thierry at openstack.org  Thu Feb  7 09:38:55 2019
From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:38:55 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <31ECD4E1A0C9AA449EFF026969B3802544EE9EEF@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <31ECD4E1A0C9AA449EFF026969B3802544EE9EEF@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Message-ID: <7d51a1cc-99a7-c2a1-7a52-2bd921677120@openstack.org>

Anni Lai wrote:
> The sponsors, and the annual corporate revenues annual donations are listed here - https://opensource.org/sponsors
> 
> I do have one question though - I see Linux Foundation (sponsor) and Eclipse Foundation (supporter) are listed, but I don't see Apache Foundation. Does anyone have any insight as why Apache is not here?

According to some sources, the ASF was an affiliate in 2011-2012, I'm 
not sure if they stopped, when they stopped or why they stopped. Maybe 
Allison can tell us more...

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)


From vuntz at suse.com  Thu Feb  7 09:52:13 2019
From: vuntz at suse.com (Vincent Untz)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:52:13 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <20190207095213.2vx2darcovczufsb@suse.com>

Le mercredi 06 février 2019, à 16:53 +0100, Thierry Carrez a écrit :
> This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so I'd
> like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate
> organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the Mozilla
> Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python Software Foundation
> or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.
> 
> You can learn more about the process at:
> https://opensource.org/affiliates/about
> 
> Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
> 
> On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, but not
> sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open source software is
> built, not just how the resulting software is licensed. However that work
> cannot happen unless we base it on a strong open source definition, and
> participating as an OSI affiliate would give us opportunities to have those
> new standardization discussion at that level.

+1

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.


From davanum at gmail.com  Thu Feb  7 12:01:49 2019
From: davanum at gmail.com (Davanum Srinivas)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 07:01:49 -0500
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <7d51a1cc-99a7-c2a1-7a52-2bd921677120@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <31ECD4E1A0C9AA449EFF026969B3802544EE9EEF@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
 <7d51a1cc-99a7-c2a1-7a52-2bd921677120@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <CANw6fcEjdw7bzaLBdnnXLRdNJzkcc4_9cTrsfF59o+POZvAMvw@mail.gmail.com>

Thierry,

2012 was around the time the affiliate agreement was drafted, but
governance OSI itself was not fully in place. So there were concerns about
clauses in there (see the 48 hours rule). other things i remember was ASF
as a 501c3 having to pay for it. That's when ASF quietly pulled out if i
remember right. However there were several people like JimJag were on the
board of the OSI with their personal hat on and guided the OSI for a while.

thanks,
Dims

[1] https://opensource.org/affiliateAgreement

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 4:41 AM Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:

> Anni Lai wrote:
> > The sponsors, and the annual corporate revenues annual donations are
> listed here - https://opensource.org/sponsors
> >
> > I do have one question though - I see Linux Foundation (sponsor) and
> Eclipse Foundation (supporter) are listed, but I don't see Apache
> Foundation. Does anyone have any insight as why Apache is not here?
>
> According to some sources, the ASF was an affiliate in 2011-2012, I'm
> not sure if they stopped, when they stopped or why they stopped. Maybe
> Allison can tell us more...
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190207/17759ad0/attachment-0001.html>

From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com  Thu Feb  7 15:16:59 2019
From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:16:59 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <57da5ef2-bfe4-f56d-4520-f5fdca24fa2f@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <57da5ef2-bfe4-f56d-4520-f5fdca24fa2f@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <0a6576563150465a850271e68f35e9e7@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>

That makes sense.
We should promote OSI message  and open source ecosystem.
Thanks,
Arkady

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> 
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 3:33 AM
To: Kanevsky, Arkady; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 

Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com wrote:
> Thierry,
> Putting my Finance committee hat.
> 
> Do you know what are OSI expectations on contributions?
> ◾To make annual contributions towards the running of OSI where possible.

The agreement[1] goes into more details. It states that as an OSI Affiliate Member you have the following responsibility:

"To the extent possible, make annual and/or project-specific contributions, monetary and/or otherwise, to aid OSI and its special-interest projects."

[1] https://opensource.org/affiliateAgreement

I was thinking that our contribution could be to support their messaging with our communications, and have staff participate in their initiatives where applicable. I'm definitely interested in engaging more directly with OSI, for the reasons I explained in the last paragraph on my email. 
I don't think we should "sponsor" them as I find weird to have Foundations sponsor other Foundations (but I encourage our members to become sponsors of OSI !).

Allison Randal was on OSI board of directors, maybe she can clarify what that expectation is. In all cases, if we start this process we would have that agreement reviewed by our lawyers to clarify our commitments before we proceed.

--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

From sean.mcginnis at gmail.com  Thu Feb  7 15:30:54 2019
From: sean.mcginnis at gmail.com (Sean McGinnis)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:30:54 -0500
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <57da5ef2-bfe4-f56d-4520-f5fdca24fa2f@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <cc4609e827bb4ab48959915d8d8f307e@AUSX13MPS304.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <57da5ef2-bfe4-f56d-4520-f5fdca24fa2f@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <CALvgmaRn8URuKNsEc5Cd_GRYvKoUKWfVUv_zPL=nbv5AbZUQQw@mail.gmail.com>

>
>
> The agreement[1] goes into more details. It states that as an OSI
> Affiliate Member you have the following responsibility:
>
> "To the extent possible, make annual and/or project-specific
> contributions, monetary and/or otherwise, to aid OSI and its
> special-interest projects."
>
> [1] https://opensource.org/affiliateAgreement
>
>
This sounds great to me. Open source is a very key thing of who we are, so
I agree we should support OSI.

Sean
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190207/e7e9bd31/attachment.html>

From allison at openstack.org  Thu Feb  7 17:31:52 2019
From: allison at openstack.org (Allison Price)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:31:52 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] OpenStack Foundation 2018 Annual Report
Message-ID: <74148057-916E-4953-9E17-2193B269333A@openstack.org>

Hi everyone, 

Today, we have published the OpenStack Foundation 2018 Annual Report [1], a yearly report highlighting the incredible work and advancements being achieved by the community. Thank you to all of the community contributors who helped pull the report together. 

Read the latest on: 
The Foundation’s latest initiatives to support Open Infrastructure 
Project updates from the OpenStack, Airship, Kata Containers, StarlingX, and Zuul communities
Highlights from OpenStack Workings Groups and SIGs
Community programs including OpenStack Upstream Institute, the Travel Support Program, Outreachy Internship Programs, and Contributor recognition 
OpenStack Foundation events including PTGs, Forums, OpenStack / OpenInfra Days, and the OpenStack Summit

With almost 100,000 individual members, our community accomplished a lot last year. If you would like to continue to stay updated in the latest Foundation and project news, subscribe to the bi-weekly Open Infrastructure newsletter [2]. 

We look forward to another successful year in 2019! 

Cheers, 
Allison

[1] https://www.openstack.org/foundation/2018-openstack-foundation-annual-report <https://www.openstack.org/foundation/2018-openstack-foundation-annual-report>  
[2] https://www.openstack.org/community/email-signup <https://www.openstack.org/community/email-signup> 

Allison Price
OpenStack Foundation
allison at openstack.org




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190207/fc914617/attachment.html>

From thierry at openstack.org  Fri Feb  8 10:28:23 2019
From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 11:28:23 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>

Hi everyone,

Since the affiliate agreement asks for some requirements that we need to 
clarify, it will take a bit of time to process.

In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their 
recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966

According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they 
"will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".

[1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177

I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come 
with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to 
that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I 
propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation 
immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal 
OSI affiliation.

Thoughts ?

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)


From davanum at gmail.com  Fri Feb  8 12:19:49 2019
From: davanum at gmail.com (Davanum Srinivas)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:19:49 -0500
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:33 AM Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Since the affiliate agreement asks for some requirements that we need to
> clarify, it will take a bit of time to process.
>
> In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
> recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":
>
> https://opensource.org/node/966
>
> According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
> "will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".
>
> [1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177
>
> I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
> with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
> that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
> propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
> immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
> OSI affiliation.
>

I'd support this path +1 @ttx


> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/fdba99f4/attachment-0001.html>

From sean.mcginnis at gmail.com  Fri Feb  8 15:15:13 2019
From: sean.mcginnis at gmail.com (Sean McGinnis)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:15:13 -0500
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>

>
> In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
>> recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":
>>
>> https://opensource.org/node/966
>>
>> According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
>> "will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".
>>
>> [1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177
>>
>> I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
>> with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
>> that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
>> propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
>> immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
>> OSI affiliation.
>>
>
> I'd support this path +1 @ttx
>

+1 from me as well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/11746f45/attachment.html>

From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com  Fri Feb  8 16:24:53 2019
From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:24:53 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6f2eb13f02ca45d08eedbccddac8916c@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>

+1

From: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM
To: Davanum Srinivas
Cc: Thierry Carrez; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966

According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
"will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".

[1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177

I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
OSI affiliation.

I'd support this path +1 @ttx

+1 from me as well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/f0c6a03a/attachment.html>

From mrhillsman at gmail.com  Fri Feb  8 20:16:12 2019
From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 14:16:12 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <6f2eb13f02ca45d08eedbccddac8916c@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <6f2eb13f02ca45d08eedbccddac8916c@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>
Message-ID: <CAMVtB2FVGsjw8gi8+W-y-1Pt_je_mrishzOpP0UWEEG5Vhdp-g@mail.gmail.com>

+1

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM
> *To:* Davanum Srinivas
> *Cc:* Thierry Carrez; foundation at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
> affiliate org
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
> recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":
>
> https://opensource.org/node/966
>
> According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
> "will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".
>
> [1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177
>
> I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
> with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
> that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
> propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
> immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
> OSI affiliation.
>
>
>
> I'd support this path +1 @ttx
>
>
>
> +1 from me as well.
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>


-- 
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhillsman at gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/2e6fa4a8/attachment.html>

From rv6848 at att.com  Fri Feb  8 20:34:05 2019
From: rv6848 at att.com (VAN WYK, RYAN L)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 20:34:05 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <CAMVtB2FVGsjw8gi8+W-y-1Pt_je_mrishzOpP0UWEEG5Vhdp-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <6f2eb13f02ca45d08eedbccddac8916c@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <CAMVtB2FVGsjw8gi8+W-y-1Pt_je_mrishzOpP0UWEEG5Vhdp-g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50998AA9@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com>

+1

Ryan van Wyk
Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Network Cloud Software Engineering

C: 312-860-0966
rv6848 at att.com<mailto:rv6848 at att.com>

Assistant: Lisa Selsor | 314.450.2687 | ls2276 at att.com<mailto:ls2276 at att.com>

From: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 2:16 PM
To: Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>; Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>; Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

+1

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com<mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>> wrote:
+1

From: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com<mailto:sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM
To: Davanum Srinivas
Cc: Thierry Carrez; foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__opensource.org_node_966&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=W8w5hIzgYMF66XtsGkrNJjaUAkoD8mg-Dt__7Ufoxg0&e=>

According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
"will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".

[1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_OpenSourceOrg_status_1093546182465458177&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=JwEqxHdXZMbwzguEdLUBg9gI1q_1Siokv1uIlD3vUYU&e=>

I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
OSI affiliation.

I'd support this path +1 @ttx

+1 from me as well.
_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=zE3j6xshs02ZiE7wn4MOaUcsTNcvRTu_PZL74HRTCqs&e=>


--
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhillsman at gmail.com<mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>
mobile: (832) 264-2646
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/2cea33ea/attachment-0001.html>

From noggin143 at gmail.com  Fri Feb  8 21:05:16 2019
From: noggin143 at gmail.com (Tim Bell)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 22:05:16 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50998AA9@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <6f2eb13f02ca45d08eedbccddac8916c@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <CAMVtB2FVGsjw8gi8+W-y-1Pt_je_mrishzOpP0UWEEG5Vhdp-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50998AA9@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com>
Message-ID: <09DE7A1A-0A79-4DCE-BB17-126663150F7B@gmail.com>

Maybe we need to see if there are any objections to signing up to the "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966

 

>From my side, it seems that this is consistent with the foundation’s principles.

 

Any concerns?

 

Tim

 

From: "VAN WYK, RYAN L" <rv6848 at att.com>
Date: Friday, 8 February 2019 at 21:35
To: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>, Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>, "<foundation at lists.openstack.org>" <foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

 

+1

 

Ryan van Wyk

Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Network Cloud Software Engineering

 

C: 312-860-0966

rv6848 at att.com

 

Assistant: Lisa Selsor | 314.450.2687 | ls2276 at att.com 

 

From: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 2:16 PM
To: Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>; Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>; Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

 

+1

 

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:

+1

 

From: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM
To: Davanum Srinivas
Cc: Thierry Carrez; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

 

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 

In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their 
recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966

According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they 
"will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".

[1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177

I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come 
with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to 
that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I 
propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation 
immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal 
OSI affiliation.

 

I'd support this path +1 @ttx

 

+1 from me as well.

_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation


 

-- 

Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman

mrhillsman at gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646

_______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/58eaacda/attachment.html>

From marko at markocloud.com  Fri Feb  8 21:27:28 2019
From: marko at markocloud.com (Marko Sluga)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:27:28 -0500
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <09DE7A1A-0A79-4DCE-BB17-126663150F7B@gmail.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <6f2eb13f02ca45d08eedbccddac8916c@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <CAMVtB2FVGsjw8gi8+W-y-1Pt_je_mrishzOpP0UWEEG5Vhdp-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50998AA9@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com>
 <09DE7A1A-0A79-4DCE-BB17-126663150F7B@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <168cf021bd8.11ffb53b0317721.1656641003703439863@markocloud.com>

Imho, I don't see how anyone could object to something that can only make the Open Source world a better place!



Regards,



Marko Sluga

Cloud Consultant, Independent OpenStack Instructor, AWS Authorized Instructor - Champion



Want to learn about AWS? Get my book https://www.packtpub.com/virtualization-and-cloud/aws-certified-sysops-administrator-associate-guide!






W: http://markocloud.com








---- On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:05:16 -0500 Tim Bell <noggin143 at gmail.com> wrote ----




Maybe we need to see if there are any objections to signing up to the "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__opensource.org_node_966&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=W8w5hIzgYMF66XtsGkrNJjaUAkoD8mg-Dt__7Ufoxg0&e=
 

>From my side, it seems that this is consistent with the foundation’s principles.

 

Any concerns?

 

Tim

 

From: "VAN WYK, RYAN L" <mailto:rv6848 at att.com>
Date: Friday, 8 February 2019 at 21:35
To: Melvin Hillsman <mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>, Arkady Kanevsky <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <mailto:sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>, Davanum Srinivas <mailto:davanum at gmail.com>, Thierry Carrez <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>, "<mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>" <mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

 


+1

 

Ryan van Wyk

Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Network Cloud Software Engineering

 

C: 312-860-0966

mailto:rv6848 at att.com

 

Assistant: Lisa Selsor | 314.450.2687 | mailto:ls2276 at att.com

 


From: Melvin Hillsman <mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com> 

Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 2:16 PM

To: Arkady Kanevsky <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>

Cc: Sean McGinnis <mailto:sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>; Davanum Srinivas <mailto:davanum at gmail.com>; Thierry Carrez <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>; mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org

Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


 

+1


 

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:


+1

 


From: Sean McGinnis <mailto:sean.mcginnis at gmail.com> 

Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM

To: Davanum Srinivas

Cc: Thierry Carrez; mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org

Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


 

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]



In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their 

recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":



https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__opensource.org_node_966&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=W8w5hIzgYMF66XtsGkrNJjaUAkoD8mg-Dt__7Ufoxg0&e=



According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they 

"will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".



[1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_OpenSourceOrg_status_1093546182465458177&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=JwEqxHdXZMbwzguEdLUBg9gI1q_1Siokv1uIlD3vUYU&e=



I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come 

with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to 

that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I 

propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation 

immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal 

OSI affiliation.



 


I'd support this path +1 @ttx





 


+1 from me as well.







_______________________________________________

Foundation mailing list

mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=zE3j6xshs02ZiE7wn4MOaUcsTNcvRTu_PZL74HRTCqs&e=






 


--

Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman

mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646









_______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation


_______________________________________________

Foundation mailing list

mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/a9d7daa5/attachment-0001.html>

From steven.dake at gmail.com  Fri Feb  8 21:51:33 2019
From: steven.dake at gmail.com (Steven Dake)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 14:51:33 -0700
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <09DE7A1A-0A79-4DCE-BB17-126663150F7B@gmail.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <6f2eb13f02ca45d08eedbccddac8916c@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <CAMVtB2FVGsjw8gi8+W-y-1Pt_je_mrishzOpP0UWEEG5Vhdp-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50998AA9@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com>
 <09DE7A1A-0A79-4DCE-BB17-126663150F7B@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPwfPsi_xeX=bhjLSAF-Yaoc-o+wvkVwYxX1f=8eiNSsnB8MnA@mail.gmail.com>

Mark Raddcliff may be interested in this thread to do some analysis on the
legal implications if any.

Cheers
-steve

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:07 PM Tim Bell <noggin143 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe we need to see if there are any objections to signing up to the "Affirmation
> of the Open Source Definition":
>
> https://opensource.org/node/966
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__opensource.org_node_966&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=W8w5hIzgYMF66XtsGkrNJjaUAkoD8mg-Dt__7Ufoxg0&e=>
>
>
>
> From my side, it seems that this is consistent with the foundation’s
> principles.
>
>
>
> Any concerns?
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> *From: *"VAN WYK, RYAN L" <rv6848 at att.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 8 February 2019 at 21:35
> *To: *Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>, Arkady Kanevsky <
> Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
> *Cc: *Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>, Davanum Srinivas <
> davanum at gmail.com>, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>, "<
> foundation at lists.openstack.org>" <foundation at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
> affiliate org
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> *Ryan van Wyk*
>
> Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Network Cloud Software Engineering
>
>
>
> C: 312-860-0966
>
> rv6848 at att.com
>
>
>
> *Assistant:* Lisa Selsor | 314.450.2687 | ls2276 at att.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 2:16 PM
> *To:* Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
> *Cc:* Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>; Davanum Srinivas <
> davanum at gmail.com>; Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>;
> foundation at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
> affiliate org
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM
> *To:* Davanum Srinivas
> *Cc:* Thierry Carrez; foundation at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
> affiliate org
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
> recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":
>
> https://opensource.org/node/966
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__opensource.org_node_966&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=W8w5hIzgYMF66XtsGkrNJjaUAkoD8mg-Dt__7Ufoxg0&e=>
>
> According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
> "will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".
>
> [1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_OpenSourceOrg_status_1093546182465458177&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=JwEqxHdXZMbwzguEdLUBg9gI1q_1Siokv1uIlD3vUYU&e=>
>
> I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
> with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
> that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
> propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
> immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
> OSI affiliation.
>
>
>
> I'd support this path +1 @ttx
>
>
>
> +1 from me as well.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=zE3j6xshs02ZiE7wn4MOaUcsTNcvRTu_PZL74HRTCqs&e=>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Melvin Hillsman
>
> mrhillsman at gmail.com
> mobile: (832) 264-2646
>
> _______________________________________________ Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190208/3a03f9bb/attachment.html>

From amy at demarco.com  Sun Feb 10 16:04:45 2019
From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:04:45 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] D&I WG Meeting Reminder
Message-ID: <CAFs83QrARrBApze59o+bqBHZ8dgDqk-kmnt=xG_ZrN++qbNBJQ@mail.gmail.com>

 The Diversity & Inclusion WG will hold it's next meeting Monday(2/11) at
17:00 UTC in the #openstack-diversity channel. The agenda can be found at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda. Please feel free to
add any other topics you wish to discuss at the meeting.

Including the discuss list to invite potential new members!

Thanks,
Amy (spotz)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190210/3eb2b7e1/attachment.html>

From shane.wang at intel.com  Mon Feb 11 01:54:53 2019
From: shane.wang at intel.com (Wang, Shane)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 01:54:53 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50998AA9@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <CANw6fcEt2CzhOKLoU3DpM7Oxx0=7DjB+vorMmtbGgz3at+JM+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvgmaQ71L=LJ5V3hV77s7FnWkgEjw6g-n+AtSxbJPr=zbFj+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <6f2eb13f02ca45d08eedbccddac8916c@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>
 <CAMVtB2FVGsjw8gi8+W-y-1Pt_je_mrishzOpP0UWEEG5Vhdp-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <9B4615ED4FEDC74EA1FAF8B11F578BFA50998AA9@MOSTLS1MSGUSREG.ITServices.sbc.com>
Message-ID: <3AB6CE7F274E534CAFD089D127A8A1FC3A8A5600@SHSMSX107.ccr.corp.intel.com>

+1. We need support open source.

Regards.
--
Shane
From: VAN WYK, RYAN L [mailto:rv6848 at att.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 4:34 AM
To: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>; Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>; Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>; Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>; foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

+1

Ryan van Wyk
Assistant Vice President (AVP) – Network Cloud Software Engineering

C: 312-860-0966
rv6848 at att.com<mailto:rv6848 at att.com>

Assistant: Lisa Selsor | 314.450.2687 | ls2276 at att.com<mailto:ls2276 at att.com>

From: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com<mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 2:16 PM
To: Arkady Kanevsky <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com<mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>>
Cc: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com<mailto:sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>>; Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com<mailto:davanum at gmail.com>>; Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org<mailto:thierry at openstack.org>>; foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org

+1

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com<mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>> wrote:
+1

From: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com<mailto:sean.mcginnis at gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 9:15 AM
To: Davanum Srinivas
Cc: Thierry Carrez; foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:foundation at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":

https://opensource.org/node/966<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__opensource.org_node_966&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=W8w5hIzgYMF66XtsGkrNJjaUAkoD8mg-Dt__7Ufoxg0&e=>

According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
"will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".

[1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_OpenSourceOrg_status_1093546182465458177&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=JwEqxHdXZMbwzguEdLUBg9gI1q_1Siokv1uIlD3vUYU&e=>

I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
OSI affiliation.

I'd support this path +1 @ttx

+1 from me as well.
_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_foundation&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=CXUZ4nQ3OEMXP344JOLWVg&m=_QU2RqcEQlkT4LRwsuh8gcpA3fHrikk6vO3AAyrk-Ak&s=zE3j6xshs02ZiE7wn4MOaUcsTNcvRTu_PZL74HRTCqs&e=>


--
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhillsman at gmail.com<mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>
mobile: (832) 264-2646
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190211/56ec867b/attachment-0001.html>

From jungleboyj at gmail.com  Mon Feb 11 15:47:45 2019
From: jungleboyj at gmail.com (Jay Bryant)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:47:45 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <cbeb2635-c4ab-0890-3ff1-40fef0824221@gmail.com>

+1 from me.  This clearly seems to go with the spirit of OpenStack and 
Open Infrastructure.

Jay

On 2/6/2019 9:53 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under 
> attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their 
> software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open 
> source, or at least being confused with open source.
>
> That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important 
> than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition 
> for over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the 
> definition, while informing people and discouraging license 
> proliferation.
>
> This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so 
> I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate 
> organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the 
> Mozilla Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python 
> Software Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.
>
> You can learn more about the process at:
> https://opensource.org/affiliates/about
>
> Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
>
> On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary, 
> but not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open 
> source software is built, not just how the resulting software is 
> licensed. However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a 
> strong open source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate 
> would give us opportunities to have those new standardization 
> discussion at that level.
>


From a.hosam at gmail.com  Mon Feb 11 17:06:43 2019
From: a.hosam at gmail.com (Hosam Al Ali)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:06:43 +0300
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <cbeb2635-c4ab-0890-3ff1-40fef0824221@gmail.com>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <cbeb2635-c4ab-0890-3ff1-40fef0824221@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGq5VEe1+Yuub==KMK+t9TugUOEVh_Qf65v5KDDTqYkiaX=7sw@mail.gmail.com>

+1

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019, 6:48 PM Jay Bryant <jungleboyj at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 from me.  This clearly seems to go with the spirit of OpenStack and
> Open Infrastructure.
>
> Jay
>
> On 2/6/2019 9:53 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Over the past year, the definition of "open source" has been under
> > attack, as some enterprises wanted to change the licensing of their
> > software while continuing to reap the benefits of calling it open
> > source, or at least being confused with open source.
> >
> > That makes the work of the Open Source Initiative (OSI) more important
> > than ever. They have been the steadfast guardians of that definition
> > for over 20 years, approving software licenses that were following the
> > definition, while informing people and discouraging license
> > proliferation.
> >
> > This is very much in line with the OpenStack Foundation objectives, so
> > I'd like to propose that the OpenStack Foundation becomes an affiliate
> > organization of the OSI. Other open source foundations, like the
> > Mozilla Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, Linux Foundation, Python
> > Software Foundation or Perl Foundation are already affiliates.
> >
> > You can learn more about the process at:
> > https://opensource.org/affiliates/about
> >
> > Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
> >
> > On a personal note... I think that today, open source is necessary,
> > but not sufficient: we also need to define standards on how open
> > source software is built, not just how the resulting software is
> > licensed. However that work cannot happen unless we base it on a
> > strong open source definition, and participating as an OSI affiliate
> > would give us opportunities to have those new standardization
> > discussion at that level.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>
-- 

*Hosam** Al Ali*

Senior UNIX/Linux System Administrator / OpenStack Cloud Admin - SITA -
Saudi Arabia
KCM100 - COA - OCM100 - OCM50 - SCSA - SCNA - SCSECA - MCSAM - MCSE  Riyadh
11623, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ("SITA/NIC")
| M:*+966 55 8397888* |


*Bio & Email:* a.hosam <http://goog_1239821962>*@gmail.com*
<http://gmail.com/> | *www.about.me/* <http://www.about.me/ahosam>*ahosam*
<http://www.about.me/ahosam>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190211/d4b44240/attachment.html>

From claire at openstack.org  Wed Feb 13 22:03:15 2019
From: claire at openstack.org (Claire Massey)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:03:15 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Provide Feedback on OSF Pilot Project
	Confirmation Guidelines
Message-ID: <27900BEA-8331-4B07-B072-04399AB77434@openstack.org>

Hi everyone,

Quick update and call to action on the process for confirming pilot projects as top-level open infrastructure projects at the Foundation. As you know, a pilot project will be eligible to be reviewed by the Board within 18 months of it receiving support from the Foundation, in order to decide on long-term investment of OSF resources to support it. As such, a subgroup of the Board has been working to draft guidelines to use when reviewing a project that requests to be confirmed. 

A bit of background - in August 2018 Jonathan emailed the Foundation ML with an update on OSF open infrastructure projects.[1] This topic was also previously discussed at a very high-level at previous Board meetings, including the September 18 meeting[2] (starting around slide 38).

In mid-December a sub group of the Board formed and began holding regular meetings to workshop through drafting the guidelines. The guidelines have since been circulated for feedback with the leadership bodies from OSF pilot projects Airship, Kata Containers, StarlingX and Zuul as well as the OpenStack TC and OpenStack UC. All of the feedback from each of these community groups has been incorporated into the current draft. 

*We now invite you, the broader community, to participate in this effort* by reviewing the current working draft in this etherpad and adding in your feedback and comments no later than *February 20*: 

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/FoundationListFeedback-ConfirmationGuidelines. 

The Board subgroup will meet again in late February to review your feedback and incorporate it into the final set of guidelines that will be presented for review and approval in the OSF Board Meeting on March 5.  Following the approval of the guidelines, Kata Containers and Zuul will be the first pilot projects that are eligible for review and confirmation as top-level open infrastructure projects. 

Thanks,
Claire


[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-August/002617.html 
[2] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10UyCpxkjPqC3kT-dYRpBxzNT39i2OhlggJvzGDosMz0/edit#slide=id.g4274351d5e_1_392
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190213/dd233958/attachment.html>

From emilien at redhat.com  Thu Feb 14 14:59:40 2019
From: emilien at redhat.com (Emilien Macchi)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:59:40 -0500
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <CACu=hyuN74Q8E=rUkP3mpBxTGUMQ07isnNkFvC9c370s4BCJNQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:58 AM Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
wrote:

>
> Does anyone have concerns with that, before we proceed ?
>

Let's do it!
-- 
Emilien Macchi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190214/5ec3d449/attachment.html>

From jimmy at openstack.org  Fri Feb 15 03:04:38 2019
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:04:38 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] [openstack-community] [OpenStack
 Marketing] Open Infrastructure Summit Denver - Community Voting Open
In-Reply-To: <CAC0=-7Xht-u-zEjRJ-rkvpRdJGJo3Tf+w5ZDqn-8i=+C=C4obw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6B02F9A1-28A7-4F43-85E1-66AD570ED37B@openstack.org>
 <5164AFCF-285F-43F0-8718-A8F9DDCAF48A@openstack.org>
 <CAC0=-7Xht-u-zEjRJ-rkvpRdJGJo3Tf+w5ZDqn-8i=+C=C4obw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5C662C46.7010700@openstack.org>

Hi Fred,

Please see below:

> Fred Li <mailto:yongle.li at gmail.com>
> February 14, 2019 at 6:26 PM
> Hi Ashlee,
>
> May I have a question about the schedule? According to [1] I got that 
> the price increase late February. I am wondering whether the selection 
> of presentations will be finished before that?
Yes, the price increase will occur after the schedule announcement.
> My questions are,
> 1. when will the presentation selection finish?
Expected February 20th.
> 2. will the contributors whose presentations get selected get a free 
> summit ticket as before?
Yes, for sure. Presenters and alternates will receive a complimentary 
ticket.
> 3. will the contributors who attended the previous PTG get a discount 
> for PTG tickets?
Yes, PTG attendees should have already received this discount. If you 
did not, please let us know at summitreg at openstack.org and we'll be 
happy to assist.

Cheers,
Jimmy
>
> [1] https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/faq/
>
> Regards
> Fred
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards
> Fred Li (李永乐)
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
> Ashlee Ferguson <mailto:ashlee at openstack.org>
> February 4, 2019 at 12:26 PM
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just under 12 hours left to vote for the sessions 
> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/vote-for-speakers> you’d 
> like to see at the Denver Open Infrastructure Summit 
> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019>!
>
>
> REGISTER
> Register for the Summit 
> <https://openinfrasummitandptgdenver.eventbrite.com/>before prices 
> increase in late February!
>
> VISA APPLICATION PROCESS
> Make sure to secure your Visa soon. More information 
> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support>about 
> the Visa application process.
>
> TRAVEL SUPPORT PROGRAM
> February 27 is the last day to submit applications. Please submit your 
> applications 
> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support>by 11:59pm 
> Pacific Time (February 28 at 7:59am UTC).
>
> If you have any questions, please email summit at openstack.org 
> <mailto:summit at openstack.org>.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ashlee
>
>
> Ashlee Ferguson
> OpenStack Foundation
> ashlee at openstack.org <mailto:ashlee at openstack.org>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jan 31, 2019, at 12:29 PM, Ashlee Ferguson <ashlee at openstack.org 
>> <mailto:ashlee at openstack.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Community voting for the Open Infrastructure Summit Denver sessions 
>> is open!
>>
>> You can VOTE HERE 
>> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/vote-for-speakers>, but 
>> what does that mean? 
>>
>> Now that the Call for Presentations has closed, all submissions are 
>> available for community vote and input. After community voting 
>> closes, the volunteer Programming Committee members will receive the 
>> presentations to review and determine the final selections for Summit 
>> schedule. While community votes are meant to help inform the 
>> decision, Programming Committee members are expected to exercise 
>> judgment in their area of expertise and help ensure diversity of 
>> sessions and speakers. View full details of the session selection 
>> process here 
>> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/call-for-presentations/selection-process/>.
>>
>> In order to vote, you need an OSF community membership. If you do not 
>> have an account, please create one by going to openstack.org/join 
>> <http://openstack.org/join>. If you need to reset your password, you 
>> can do that here <https://www.openstack.org/Security/lostpassword>.
>>
>> Hurry, voting closes Monday, February 4 at 11:59pm Pacific Time 
>> (Tuesday, February 5 at 7:59 UTC).
>>
>> Continue to visit https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019for all 
>> Summit-related information.
>>
>> REGISTER
>> Register for the Summit 
>> <https://openinfrasummitandptgdenver.eventbrite.com/>before prices 
>> increase in late February!
>>
>> VISA APPLICATION PROCESS
>> Make sure to secure your Visa soon. More information 
>> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support>about 
>> the Visa application process.
>>
>> TRAVEL SUPPORT PROGRAM
>> February 27 is the last day to submit applications. Please submit 
>> your applications 
>> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support>by 
>> 11:59pm Pacific Time (February 28 at 7:59am UTC).
>>
>> If you have any questions, please email summit at openstack.org 
>> <mailto:summit at openstack.org>.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ashlee
>>
>>
>> Ashlee Ferguson
>> OpenStack Foundation
>> ashlee at openstack.org <mailto:ashlee at openstack.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foundation mailing list
>> Foundation at lists.openstack.org <mailto:Foundation at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
> Ashlee Ferguson <mailto:ashlee at openstack.org>
> January 31, 2019 at 12:29 PM
> Hi everyone,
>
> Community voting for the Open Infrastructure Summit Denver sessions is 
> open!
>
> You can VOTE HERE 
> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/vote-for-speakers>, but 
> what does that mean?
>
> Now that the Call for Presentations has closed, all submissions are 
> available for community vote and input. After community voting closes, 
> the volunteer Programming Committee members will receive the 
> presentations to review and determine the final selections for Summit 
> schedule. While community votes are meant to help inform the decision, 
> Programming Committee members are expected to exercise judgment in 
> their area of expertise and help ensure diversity of sessions and 
> speakers. View full details of the session selection process here 
> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/call-for-presentations/selection-process/>.
>
> In order to vote, you need an OSF community membership. If you do not 
> have an account, please create one by going to openstack.org/join 
> <http://openstack.org/join>. If you need to reset your password, you 
> can do that here <https://www.openstack.org/Security/lostpassword>.
>
> Hurry, voting closes Monday, February 4 at 11:59pm Pacific Time 
> (Tuesday, February 5 at 7:59 UTC).
>
> Continue to visit https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019for all 
> Summit-related information.
>
> REGISTER
> Register for the Summit 
> <https://openinfrasummitandptgdenver.eventbrite.com/>before prices 
> increase in late February!
>
> VISA APPLICATION PROCESS
> Make sure to secure your Visa soon. More information 
> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support>about 
> the Visa application process.
>
> TRAVEL SUPPORT PROGRAM
> February 27 is the last day to submit applications. Please submit your 
> applications 
> <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/travel/#travel-support>by 11:59pm 
> Pacific Time (February 28 at 7:59am UTC).
>
> If you have any questions, please email summit at openstack.org 
> <mailto:summit at openstack.org>.
>
> Cheers,
> Ashlee
>
>
> Ashlee Ferguson
> OpenStack Foundation
> ashlee at openstack.org <mailto:ashlee at openstack.org>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation mailing list
> Foundation at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190214/94f6b2db/attachment-0001.html>

From ashlee at openstack.org  Wed Feb 20 16:00:16 2019
From: ashlee at openstack.org (Ashlee Ferguson)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:00:16 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Denver Summit Schedule Live
Message-ID: <5874F7CF-43AD-4928-B4C9-220FCC0D8E19@openstack.org>

Hi everyone, 

The agenda for the Open Infrastructure Summit  <https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/summit-schedule>(formerly the OpenStack Summit) is now live! If you need a reason to join the Summit in Denver, April 29-May 1, here’s what you can expect: 

Breakout sessions spanning 30+ open source projects from technical community leaders and organizations including ARM, AT&T, China Mobile, Baidu, Boeing, Blizzard Entertainment, Haitong Securities Company, NASA, and more. 
Project updates and onboarding from OSF projects: Airship, Kata Containers, OpenStack, StarlingX, and Zuul. 
Join collaborative sessions at the Forum <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum>, where open infrastructure operators and upstream developers will gather to jointly chart the future of open source infrastructure, discussing topics ranging from upgrades to networking models and how to get started contributing.
Get hands on training around open source technologies directly from the developers and operators building the software. 

Now what? 

Register <https://openinfrasummitandptgdenver.eventbrite.com/> before prices increase on February 27 at 11:59pm PT (February 28 at 7:59am UTC) 
Then, book a room <https://www.hyatt.com/en-US/group-booking/DENCC/G-FNTE> at the official Summit hotel while rooms are still available! 

Questions? Reach out to summit at openstack.org <mailto:summit at openstack.org> 

Cheers,
Ashlee


Ashlee Ferguson
OpenStack Foundation
ashlee at openstack.org




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190220/66f154cf/attachment.html>

From amy at demarco.com  Fri Feb 22 12:34:45 2019
From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 13:34:45 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] D&I WG Meeting Reminder
Message-ID: <CAFs83QrA7+6Q46kChxENUpPthGJDNmQd1s9Yoy+BkuWWzbQYGA@mail.gmail.com>

The Diversity & Inclusion WG will hold it's next meeting Monday(2/25) at
17:00 UTC in the #openstack-diversity channel. The agenda can be found at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda. Please feel free to
add any other topics you wish to discuss at the meeting.

Thanks,
Amy (spotz)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190222/9a2f2d26/attachment.html>

From jonathan at openstack.org  Wed Feb 27 15:04:34 2019
From: jonathan at openstack.org (Jonathan Bryce)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:04:34 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] OpenStack Foundation Board Meeting
Message-ID: <8C8A9E88-D337-429E-B49F-FE929BD9CF12@openstack.org>

Hi everyone,

The OpenStack Foundation Board of Directors will have a first meeting next Tuesday, March 5 at 1300PST/2100UTC. The agenda and connection information can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/5March2019BoardMeeting

Jonathan

From claire at openstack.org  Wed Feb 27 18:56:29 2019
From: claire at openstack.org (claire at openstack.org)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:56:29 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Invitation: OpenStack Foundation Board
 Meeting @ Tue Mar 5, 2019 3pm - 5pm (CST) (foundation@lists.openstack.org)
Message-ID: <000000000000449ea70582e4bb84@google.com>

You have been invited to the following event.

Title: OpenStack Foundation Board Meeting
Agenda:  
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/5March2019BoardMeeting

Dial in: https://zoom.us/j/9574980705

When: Tue Mar 5, 2019 3pm – 5pm Central Time - Chicago
Where: https://zoom.us/j/9574980705

Calendar: foundation at lists.openstack.org
Who:
     * claire at openstack.org - organizer
     * foundation at lists.openstack.org
     * Jenny

Event details:  
https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=Xzc1MjMwZDFpNzBvajhiYTE2a3IzNmI5azg0cjNhYmEyNnNyazhiYTQ4OTIzYWM5Zzg0cTRjZTlqNzQgZm91bmRhdGlvbkBsaXN0cy5vcGVuc3RhY2sub3Jn&tok=MjAjY2xhaXJlQG9wZW5zdGFjay5vcmc2YjZlODEyYzhlMTYxOGQxNzYyNzRkMzcxYzYwODZmMDE1ZmU0ZDk2&ctz=America%2FChicago&hl=en&es=0

Invitation from Google Calendar: https://www.google.com/calendar/

You are receiving this courtesy email at the account  
foundation at lists.openstack.org because you are an attendee of this event.

To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event.  
Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at  
https://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification settings for  
your entire calendar.

Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to modify your RSVP  
response. Learn more at  
https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190227/1e15d88f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/calendar
Size: 1879 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190227/1e15d88f/attachment-0001.ics>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: invite.ics
Type: application/ics
Size: 1924 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190227/1e15d88f/attachment-0001.bin>

From thierry at openstack.org  Thu Feb 28 20:51:42 2019
From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:51:42 +0100
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <d0e2f29a-abf8-1f08-16b1-34964074f57f@openstack.org>

Thierry Carrez wrote:
> In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their
> recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":
> 
> https://opensource.org/node/966
> 
> According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they
> "will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".
> 
> [1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177
> 
> I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not come
> with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add ourselves to
> that, since they are still making a lot of communications around this. I
> propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack Foundation
> immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to pursuing formal
> OSI affiliation.

The Foundation was just added as a signatory to that affirmation!

OSI's announcement is at:
https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1101202880239886336

In parallel, we'll review the requirements for OSF to be added as an
associate organization, so that the decision can be presented to the
Board in a future meeting.

-- 
Thierry Carrez


From sean.mcginnis at gmail.com  Thu Feb 28 20:57:04 2019
From: sean.mcginnis at gmail.com (Sean McGinnis)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:57:04 -0600
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <d0e2f29a-abf8-1f08-16b1-34964074f57f@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <d0e2f29a-abf8-1f08-16b1-34964074f57f@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <CALvgmaS8WgXd6C_z2GybQ3AZ=JbUREGBoVvgkCWFy7qQZKS=Ng@mail.gmail.com>

>
>
> The Foundation was just added as a signatory to that affirmation!
>
> OSI's announcement is at:
> https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1101202880239886336
>
> In parallel, we'll review the requirements for OSF to be added as an
> associate organization, so that the decision can be presented to the
> Board in a future meeting.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez
>
>
Really great to see this. Thanks Thierry and team for making it happen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/attachments/20190228/cf97d5da/attachment.html>

From Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com  Thu Feb 28 21:12:06 2019
From: Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:12:06 +0000
Subject: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative
 affiliate org
In-Reply-To: <d0e2f29a-abf8-1f08-16b1-34964074f57f@openstack.org>
References: <2f289db6-d83d-3036-e1bd-4dbe7226d8ae@openstack.org>
 <8bcddc17-c8e0-e5f6-895e-e86ec12f1df8@openstack.org>
 <d0e2f29a-abf8-1f08-16b1-34964074f57f@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <5563455450084e2aaa008b4094d30e5f@AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM>

Great job Thierry.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> 
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:52 PM
To: foundation at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Becoming an Open Source Initiative affiliate org


[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 

Thierry Carrez wrote:
> In the mean time, the OSI is interested in adding signatures to their 
> recent "Affirmation of the Open Source Definition":
> 
> https://opensource.org/node/966
> 
> According to [1], this is not limited to their affiliates, and they 
> "will add more organizations as they reach out to be included".
> 
> [1] https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1093546182465458177
> 
> I think this is a statement the OSF can get behind, and it does not 
> come with further requirements. Time is of the essence to add 
> ourselves to that, since they are still making a lot of communications 
> around this. I propose that we reach out the OSI to add the OpenStack 
> Foundation immediately to that list of signatures, in parallel to 
> pursuing formal OSI affiliation.

The Foundation was just added as a signatory to that affirmation!

OSI's announcement is at:
https://twitter.com/OpenSourceOrg/status/1101202880239886336

In parallel, we'll review the requirements for OSF to be added as an associate organization, so that the decision can be presented to the Board in a future meeting.

--
Thierry Carrez

_______________________________________________
Foundation mailing list
Foundation at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation