Open Stack

Thanks for sending, and apologies for not being able to make yesterday's
meeting.

The changes all look sensible and logical to me. +1

One thing I think we need to be prepared to explain clearly to the wider
community - the OpenStack project continues to have a sort of special
status under the OSF, and it's not treated exactly the same as Open
Infrastructure Projects in the bylaws. I guess we need to be clear on the
rationale for that, and any practical implications of that.

Thanks,
Mark.

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 12:43 AM Radcliffe, Mark <Mark.Radcliffe at dlapiper.com>
wrote:

> I am enclosing a redline to the existing version of the bylaws and
> includes all of the changes, including the changes recommended today (based
> on a discussion with Jonathan, we slightly modified the last sentence
> rather than deleting it: we  deleted the reference to twelve months but
> kept the rest of the sentence).  Please feel free to call or have your
> counsel call me with any questions.
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally
> privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).
> If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message. To
> contact us directly, send to postmaster at dlapiper.com. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> Foundation-board mailing list
> Foundation-board at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation-board/attachments/20181102/d77d7ca6/attachment.html>